Re: [Fedora TeX Live] New TL2010 repository for F15 and TL2011 repo update to 20110404

2011-04-06 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:58:52PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Thanks! Any reason why you're keeping both .fc?? and .f?? suffixes? Compatibility with old repo files. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu m

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] New TL2010 repository for F15 and TL2011 repo update to 20110404

2011-04-06 Thread Neal Becker
What are the names of the meta-packages to choose for variously complete texlive? I recall there was a meta-package to use to get a pretty-much complete texlive-2010, but can't find the name. Is there some web-page describing this? I'm having a hard time discovering it. __

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] New TL2010 repository for F15 and TL2011 repo update to 20110404

2011-04-06 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
> What are the names of the meta-packages to choose for variously complete > texlive? I recall there was a meta-package to use to get a pretty-much > complete texlive-2010, but can't find the name. I usually do: yum install texlive-scheme-full > Is there some web-page describing this? I'm havi

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] New TL2010 repository for F15 and TL2011 repo update to 20110404

2011-04-06 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Neal, On 04/06/2011 04:19 PM, Neal Becker wrote: What are the names of the meta-packages to choose for variously complete texlive? I recall there was a meta-package to use to get a pretty-much complete texlive-2010, but can't find the name. Is there some web-page describing this? I'm havin