On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:26 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> ... and fixed. It was caused by rpmbuild bug actually. It incorrectly
> parses Provides tag. Provides: tex(latex)= 2012 will cause two bogus
> provides "tex(latex)=" and "2012" to be added to the final RPM. I will
> try to fix this behaviour
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:46:48PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On 2012-04-14 08:25, Johannes Lips wrote:
> > I don't think that's a bug in vim-latex because I get the same error
> > when installing another Tex-Editor. I think the problem are some
> > missing provides in the new 2012 texlive packages
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:46:48PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On 2012-04-14 08:25, Johannes Lips wrote:
> > I don't think that's a bug in vim-latex because I get the same error
> > when installing another Tex-Editor. I think the problem are some
> > missing provides in the new 2012 texlive packages
On 2012-04-14 08:25, Johannes Lips wrote:
> I don't think that's a bug in vim-latex because I get the same error
> when installing another Tex-Editor. I think the problem are some
> missing provides in the new 2012 texlive packages.
> This should be easy to fix but I think it's the reason for many
I don't think that's a bug in vim-latex because I get the same error
when installing another Tex-Editor. I think the problem are some missing
provides in the new 2012 texlive packages.
This should be easy to fix but I think it's the reason for many problems
reported recently.
Johannes
On 04/14
