Re: email

2023-10-04 Thread pmkellly
Thanks. I appreciate your help. All set now. On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:55 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2023-09-30 at 07:04 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > Yesterday I got a new ISP. I have a new email address and I changed my > > email address in the Fedora

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-10 Thread pmkellly
What is the recommended client? On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 3:03 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2023-12-11 > # Time: 16:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org > > Greet

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-11 Thread pmkellly
Kamil, Thanks. I thought I could login with my fedora account. but it won't take that do I have to change server or something else? Thanks inadvance for your continued help. Pat Kelly (tablepc) On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 3:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 10:03 PM

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-11 Thread pmkellly
link here: > https://chat.fedoraproject.org/ > > On 12/11/23 9:47 AM, pmkellly wrote: > > Kamil, > > > > Thanks. I thought I could login with my fedora account. but it won't > > take that do I have to change server or something else? > > > >

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-11 Thread pmkellly
I can read the meeting as everyone is talking, but I can't join. On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM pmkellly wrote: > It wants me read the stuff when I click join. I did read the stuff, but I > can find how I acknowledge I've read; so it won't let mee join. > > On Mo

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-11 Thread pmkellly
AM Brandon Nielsen via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > My FAS account worked following the link here: > https://chat.fedoraproject.org/ > > On 12/11/23 9:47 AM, pmkellly wrote: > > Kamil, > > > > Thanks. I thought I could login with my fedora account.

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-12-12 Thread pmkellly
e that I read them and it wouldn't let me join. I tried a few time always with the same result. Are their any settings I should check? Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-12-11 at 11:31 -0500, pmkellly wrote:

Re: Testing out test list

2024-01-21 Thread pmkellly
Your test worked fine. Happy testing. Pat (tablepc) On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:45 PM Diego Humanes Álava wrote: > this is a test > -- > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedorap

New test package

2024-01-21 Thread pmkellly
For a while now when I down load a new drop of Fedora Rawhide x86_64 Workstation to test there are two. One has "osb" in the name. Please pardon my ignorance, but what does osb stand for and how is it different? Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) -- ___

Re: New test package

2024-01-22 Thread pmkellly
Thanks Sumantro. That exactly what I wanted to know. Have a Great Day! Pat(tablepc) On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:08 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 8:34 PM pmkellly wrote: > >> For a while now when I down load a new drop of Fedora Rawhide x86_64

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

2024-10-05 Thread pmkellly
Looks good to me. Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey folks, > > A few moons ago, I volunteered to write a Beta Release Criteria. The idea > is to set a "criteria" > to have Beta images with Updates Testing enabled by default. Note,

DNF5 and STDERR

2024-11-01 Thread pmkellly
First background. I will get to my point. Please be patient. DNF5 has a long standing bug which is partially described in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172868 and in Issue 570 on GitHub. The bug still exists and seems to be effecting DNF5 operations where there is a need to send

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-06 Thread pmkellly
Looks good to me. Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 2:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > the Beta upgrade criter

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

2025-05-19 Thread pmkellly
Kamil, I agree. This is the right thing to do. Pat - tablepc On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:13 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi, > in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was > oversize [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this > criterion [3]. The criterion targe