conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

Just an FYI, the latest rawhide update gives an error about usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset conflicting between the .13 version of fedora-release and systemd. Regards, Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

age systemd-219-13.fc23.x86_64 Error Summary - Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package (as discussed about a year ago). Kevin On Fri, May 22,

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 > kevin martin wrote: > > ...snip... > >> >> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from >> systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the syste

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >> kevin martin wrote: >> >> ...snip... >> >>> >>> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset fro

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 06/10/2015 10:51 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >>> kevin martin wrote: >>> >>> ...snip... >>> >>>> &

dnf errors that yum doesn't get...

broken packages/dependency issues? -- Regards, ---- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

On 08/06/2014 07:08 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:55:55 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > >> "consistent on the same machine for a given OS release, >> _across any possible hardware changes_" > > Maybe, but I know I watched the interface names change > just because a new version of

Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

On 08/06/2014 09:32 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of >> systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of >> opinion favours the systemd approach t

jackson-annotations update problem via yum

When trying to update jackson-annotations via yum I continue to receive the following errors: http://mirrors.mit.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror.

yum error during update (Fatal Error TypeError)

yum clean all doesn't help, I'll start with that. The following error occurred with yum update today: Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback > failed, aborting! I saw this yesterday as well so decided to try to update ea

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so &$*&^%*#^&%* slow?

On 09/24/2014 09:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to > say it's nad-grindingly slow would be charitable. just now, i tried > clicking on another tab ... some 30 seconds later, i am still waiting > for the tab to change, oh, wait,

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so &$*&^%*#^&%* slow?

On 09/24/2014 09:49 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> On 09/24/2014 09:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to >>> say it's nad-grind

Re: Big problems with the lpr or lp command in F21 since some days: only empty sheets are printed: More details

-Original Message- From: Joachim Backes To: Fedora-test Sent: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 7:06 AM Subject: Re: Big problems with the lpr or lp command in F21 since some days: only empty sheets are printed: More details On 10/29/2014 12:22 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Dear F21 testers, > > having

Re: On/Off problems

On 11/20/2014 09:05 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > There is no log to test the results of this but my computer or laptop > running Fedora 21 Beta RC4 will not shutdown or restart. If > this is my fault, please let me know what to do to fix this problem. If it is > not my fault, I guessing I am r

yum rawhide failing....

Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not found messages. I see this error as well: One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. Is there a

Re: yum rawhide failing....

On 12/13/2013 09:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:52:58 +0100, poma wrote: > >>> Prefer "yum clean metadata" (or just "yum clean expire-cache") over >>> deleting even downloaded/cached packages with "all". >> >> Sí jefe, pero "todos" es tan hermosa. ;) > > "yum clean" with

Seeing this error on bootup with latest 3.14 kernel from rawhide

[0.527306] ACPI: SSDT bf71a918 0003F0 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20060912) [0.531169] ACPI: SSDT (null) 0003F0 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20060912) [0.533083] ACPI: SSDT bf718018 000891 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Cst 3001 INTL 20060912) [0.5357

dnf upgrade...some strange errors...

Did a dnf upgrade tonight and received these errors just prior to the verifying step: Cleanup : less-458-5.fc21.x86_64 394/399 Cleanup : iw-3.11-1.fc21.x86_64

Re: dnf upgrade...some strange errors...

>> >>399/399 >> depmod: ERROR: Module 'hci_vhci' has devname (vhci) but lacks major and >> minor information. Ignoring. >> 05busybox: Could not find command 'busybox'! >> 90multipath: Could not f

Re: Vmware Workstation won't compile

On 02/14/2014 01:26 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote: > > On 2/14/2014 11:06 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 05:06 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >>> kernel-3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-modules-extra-3.12.9-301.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-modules-extra-3.12.10-300.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-devel-3.

Re: /var/log/messages is scrambled!

On 02/25/2014 01:44 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > OK, I think there is no question that time did not go back in > /var/log/messages. > Actually, the messages are scrambled. > > First it is Jan 25. Then it it Jan 8. We go through normal looking periods > of > Jan 9 and 10, and Jan 13 before we're

this mornings kernel rc6 not signed...

Tried to do an update this morning and I get: Error: Package kernel-3.14.0-0.rc6.git1.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm is not signed Can somebody please fix this? Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: this mornings kernel rc6 not signed...

On 03/13/2014 09:24 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Tried to do an update this morning and I get: >> >> Error: Package kernel-3.14.0-0.rc6.git1.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm is not signed >> >> Can somebody please fix this? >

Re: Modesetting failure with kernel 3.15; ok with kernel 3.14

On 04/17/2014 01:26 PM, Steven Usdansky wrote: > Not sure where to report this problem (or what I should be looking for), but > when booting any of the 3.15 kernels, > kernel-modesetting fails and X comes up with a resolution of 1024x768, > rather than the 1680x1050 resolution specified in my >

Re: Modesetting failure with kernel 3.15; ok with kernel 3.14

On 04/17/2014 01:48 PM, Steven Usdansky wrote: > failed with error -22 I probably should have asked this before but are you using the nouveau or nvidia driver? And did you modprobe as root? Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: kernel-3.15 series fail to load gnome desktop

On 04/19/2014 12:02 PM, Tom London wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Tom London > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel > mailto:clydekunkel7...@verizon.net>> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400 > "Clyde E. Ku

kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflict with kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc21.x86_64

Today while doing a dnf upgrade I got a conflict message about the kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflicting with 3.15 rc7.git0.1. I was forced to rpm -e the rc7 headers (with --nodeps) to be able to install the rc8 versions and allow the whole set of necessary kernel packages to install so grub2

Re: kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflict with kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc21.x86_64

On 06/05/2014 02:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 13:25 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Today while doing a dnf upgrade I got a conflict message about the >> kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflicting with 3.15 rc7.git0.1. I >> was forced to rpm -e the rc7 h

todays dnf kernel update gives conflicts again....

-3.16.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc8.git1.2.fc21.x86_64 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

dnf errors or kernel* rpm problems?

dnf upgrade doesn't show an error while updating the kernel packages but there are missing entries in grub2.conf after an upgrade that should be for the new kernel that was downloaded and, supposedly, installed. If I attempt a dnf reinstall of the kernel and related rpms then I get the following

dnf cache is very large....

;t seem to clear it out with any of the dnf commands. How can I clear this up gracefully? -- Regards, -------- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: dnf cache is very large....

On 07/16/2014 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > I assume this is not planned nor correct (since my yum cache is much > smaller) but can't seem to clear it out with any of the dnf > commands.  How can I clear this up

Re: newegg.com and firefox on fedora 16?

On 11/03/2011 08:25 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:16:52AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> On 11/03/2011 07:03 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: >>> Anyone else see the same problem with newegg? >> I would have to guess it is a video driver issue instead of a Firefox >> issue. You

Re: newegg.com and firefox on fedora 16?

On 11/03/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 11/03/2011 03:09 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> Bingo! You are a genius! I had ipv6 disabled in my fedora 15 >> about:config in firefox, on fedora 16 I had the default enabled >> setting. When I disable it on f16, I can see the prices again. >> >>

Following packages fail with yum update.

Dependency Process ending --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.2.0-0.rc0.git3.0.fc17 will be erased ---> Package kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64.x86_64 0:3.2.0-0.rc0.git1.0.fc17 will be updated kernel-debug-debuginfo-3.2.0-0.rc0.git1.0.fc17.x86_64 requires: kernel-debuginfo

Latest rawhide update issues (not all strictly Fedora)

Error: Package: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek-1.4.1-2.fc17.x86_64 (@rawhide/16) Requires: xserver-abi(xinput-13) >= 0 Removing: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.11.1-2.fc17.x86_64 (@fedora) xserver-abi(xinput-13) = 0 Updated By: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.11.99.1-7.2009.

Re: Nouveau problem in F-16

On 11/23/2011 10:54 AM, ergodic wrote: > Nouveau problem. Multi-booting F-15 and F-16. Nouveau works perfectly in in > F15, but it does not wok in F-16. I have filed a bug > against it (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755336). > > Excerpts from bug report: > -Four clean install att

Todays yum dependency update issues....

Skipped (dependency problems): boost-serializationx86_64 1.48.0-2.fc17 rawhide 158 k gvfs x86_64 1.11.0-4.fc17 fedo

Re: revisor issues

Loks like you don't have the 32 bit version of anaconda installed and that is what revisor is looking for. On Feb 20, 2012 7:04 PM, "Rob Healey" wrote: > Greetings: > > I was trying to run Revisor, and it will not work. This is what I get on > my terminal screen... > > [Frog@localhost /]$ reviso

yum update failed today with....

Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin from install of google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from package filesystem-3.1-1.fc18.x86_64 Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: not able to boot Rawhide 3.5.0-0.rc4 kernels in runlevel 3

On 06/27/2012 09:48 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > I am not able to boot either of the Rawhide 3.5.0-0.rc4 kernels in runlevel 3 > (adding "3" to the boot options). Since booting in default graphical mode has > resulted for me in a black screen immediately after X starts for a long time > now, this ma

todays yum update issues for rawhide...

bs i686 186-1.fc18 fedora 108 k systemd-libs x86_64186-1.fc18 fedora 102 k systemd-sysv x86_64

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 11:29 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 07/11/2012 06:12 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> --> Processing Dependency: libudev.so.0()(64bit) for package: >> vlc-core-2.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64 > > I believe this is holding back most of your updates. > > Is vlc-core a r

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 11:36 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:12:31 -0500, > Kevin Martin wrote: >> Two questions: >> >> 1). How do I get rid of the dependency issues shown below? Do I force the >> update of systemd-libs or do the packages that ar

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 11:42 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:12:31 -0500, >> Kevin Martin wrote: >>> >>> Two questions: >>> >>> 1). How do I get rid of the dependency issues

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 01:18 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 07/11/2012 11:42 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:12:31 -0500, >>>&

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 04:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:39:28 -0500, > Kevin Martin wrote: >>> >> Please explain why that makes any difference in this discussion. I'm not >> sure I see the relevance; vlc want's the 0 version, the

Re: Beware of rebooting in rawhide right now

On 07/12/2012 02:53 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 11.7.2012 22:18, Adam Williamson napsal(a): >> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 13:37 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >> >>> Before the next netinst is released perhaps the developers could be >>> bothered to make sure it actually works. >> >> Tha

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 08:30 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 07/11/2012 04:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:39:28 -0500, >> Kevin Martin wrote: >>>> >>> Please explain why that makes any difference in this discussion. I'm not >&

need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

repository so we can update to it? BTW, FF14 from Mozilla download runs fine. -- Regards, ---- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

On 07/18/2012 02:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:14 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >> firefox 13 installed won't run with xulrunner 14 from rawhide.When >> trying to run FF13 with xulrunner 14 I get: >> >> Error: Platform version

Re: need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

On 07/18/2012 02:44 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 07/18/2012 02:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:14 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >>> firefox 13 installed won't run with xulrunner 14 from rawhide.When >>> trying to run FF13 with xulrunner 1

thunderbird 14 from rawhide won't install because thunderbird-enigmail needs tbird < 14

I didn't see a thunderbird-enigmail package in koji...is anybody working on getting a thunderbird-enigmail package for tbird 14? -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Rawhide file-conflict gnupg <> gnupg2

On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of > gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package > gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686 > Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the same system at the same time? What

Re: Rawhide file-conflict gnupg <> gnupg2

On 07/27/2012 10:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >>> Transaction Check Error: >>>file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of >>> gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 confli

xorg IOPL issue under rawhide...can't run X

Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this same time. Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I can run X again? [ 7855.008] X.Org X Server 1.12.3 Release Date: 2012-07-09 [ 7855.011] X Pr

Re: xorg IOPL issue under rawhide...can't run X

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:22 -0500, kevin martin wrote: > > Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. > > I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this > > same t

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!

On Sep 9, 2012 12:12 PM, "Kamil Paral" wrote: > > > As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6 > > (TC6) > > is now available for testing. > > Please note that Live images are mislabeled (contain 'TC5' in their name), but they are TC6 content. > _

Re: F18 yum update bricks X

On Sep 13, 2012 3:37 PM, "Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R" wrote: > > After successfully installing RC3 and adding various > packages to compile gnuradio et al. I issued a > yum -y --skip-broken update > > This pparently updated Noveau or something to a > version that doesn't quite work. The cursor

Re: RC 3.1 Really broken

On Sep 15, 2012 4:13 AM, "Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R" wrote: > > > On 09/15/2012 01:00 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> >> On 15/09/12 08:57, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> >>> I downloaded the 64 bit RC 3.1 and burned another DVD+R. >>> This one does not even get to the language choice scre

yum update of F18 showing a strange error...

not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test

Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

. So is this an xfce issue or an X issue do you think? I didn't see this behaviour in the past before starting to work with F18 and rawhide. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

> > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > ---- > > Kevin Martin > > -- > > I use F17 and Xfce. My PC is very old (Athlon) so I see a delay when > switching to a thunderbir

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

>> >> So I can switch from workspace to workspace with no issue >> now. The other issue I'm still seeing is when I move a >> window within the >> workspace...instead of the window just moving to the new >> location that I drag it to there is a noticeable delay in >> the repaint of >> the window.

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

On 10/08/12 13:26, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 10/08/2012 05:15 AM, Kevin Martin issued this missive: >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > ---

Re: F18 TC3 No Logout Option?

>> This is a new feature from the GNOME team (i.e. it's intended). They believe >> there are no use cases for logging out, if you have just a single user. > > It is a little more nuanced than that. > > We don't offer to log out if there is just a single user, and a single > session (ie desktop

Re: F18 TC3 No Logout Option?

>> This is a new feature from the GNOME team (i.e. it's intended). They believe >> there are no use cases for logging out, if you have just a single user. > > It is a little more nuanced than that. > > We don't offer to log out if there is just a single user, and a single > session (ie desktop en

why would I be seeing kswapd0 using so much CPU?

I'm seeing this: # top top - 10:28:30 up 23:45, 9 users, load average: 0.75, 0.83, 0.98 Tasks: 221 total, 2 running, 219 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.0 us, 27.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 69.9 id, 0.8 wa, 0.6 hi, 0.2 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 3952540 total, 2834232 used, 1118308 free,

Re: Adventures with TC4

On 10/16/12 22:39, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > I have installed TC4 netinst a couple of times. > The problem with the screen going black during the default install remains. > > I did another install after changing "quiet" to "nomodeset" in netinst. > This install proceeded properly, albe

Re: Adventures with TC4

On 10/17/12 09:06, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/17/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/16/12 22:39, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> I have installed TC4 netinst a couple of times. >>> The problem with the screen going black duri

yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

ldconfig ldconfig cores and the update continues (probably not the behaviour we want to see). Is there a newer version of glibc available and/or what changed in ldconfig? Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https

Re: yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

On 10/17/12 11:53, Kevin Martin wrote: > Tried to do a yum update for rawhide and it hangs. There appears to be > something wrong with /sbin/ldconfig from > glibc-2.16.90-24.fc19.x86_64.rpm. Every yum update I do now hangs while > trying to do an /sbin/ldconfig and if I try to upda

ldconfig failing during yum update was :Re: yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

On 10/17/12 12:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Just as a datapoint I am not seeing this on my rawhide instance... ;( > > So, not sure if it was an issue because I missed a days updates or > what. > > kevin > > > It looks like it's not necessarily related to rpm-libs in particular but only to the fa

texlive-base fails install (rawhide)

gards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > While waiting for a more functional Anaconda I have been > running 64 bit F18 with yum updates. > > The Noveau driver still crashes. Fortunately Nvidia still installs. > > I am able to run SCO Openserver 5.0.7 under the virtual machine. >

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/26/12 10:44, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/26/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> While waiting for a more functional Anaconda I have been >>> running 64 bit F18 with yum updates. &

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/26/12 11:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/26/2012 09:22 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/26/12 10:44, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> On 10/26/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >>>> On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

todays yum update....lots of errors....

Todays yum update came up with lots of errors. Perhaps they are related to ldconfig and/or issues with libraries not getting linked correctly but who knows? Anyway, here's the errors: Running Transaction Updating : 1:libreoffice-ure-3.6.3.2-2.fc19.x86_64 1/192 Updating : nss-u

since yesterdays update I can't "su -" anymore....

"su -" gives the following error: su: options --{shell,fast,command,session-command,login} and --user are mutually exclusive. "su root" allows me to enter the root passwordwhat's happened to "su -"? -- Regards, ---- Kevi

yum update failing for last 2 days....can't find any mirrors....

opment/rawhide/x86_64/os/repodata/e92b9ceb3d0f11e5812bdfbb7ad9f971e5c7b8d95712d9731da91131e49c1462-filelists.sqlite.bz2 Trying other mirror. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Just reporting....

looks and, now, in functionality. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they updated the grub menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu stuff in the anaconda package? I'm not even sure where to start looking for it. Kevin On 01/09/13 08:09, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:05:06

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 08:20, Kevin Martin wrote: > Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they updated the grub > menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu stuff > in the anaconda package? I'm not even sure where to start looking for it. > > Kevin >

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 08:41, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:20:01 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > >> Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they >> updated the grub menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu >> stuff in the anaconda pack

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 09:26, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:11:18 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > >> Been running rawhide for well over a year. The boot editing issue >> has occurred essentially since the anaconda changes. I did a >> reinstall of my system wi

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 09:46, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:32:50 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > > > > Just a thought do you have the menu with advanced sub-menu > Maybe you can only edit those in the sub-menu? > If that's what you have. > > So

This mornings yum update....

, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: This mornings yum update....

On 02/21/13 08:49, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:42:56 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> gives me this error: >> >> Transaction check error: >> file /usr/lib/debug from install of filesystem-3.2-4.fc19.x86_64 conflicts >> with file from pa

rawhide updates giving me errors when removing previous kernels....

/modules.builtin: remove failed: No such file or directory warning: file /lib/modules/3.8.0-1.fc19.x86_64/modules.block: remove failed: No such file or directory This is not the first time this has occurred when removing previous 3.8 kernels. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test

espeak package update fails

Transaction check error: file /usr/share/espeak-data/voices/en from install of espeak-1.47.01-1.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package espeak-1.46.02-8.fc19.x86_64 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

lxde menu items causing X crash

2215.743] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.0-3.fc20 [ 2215.743] Current version of pixman: 0.28.0 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: lxde menu items causing X crash

On 04/02/13 12:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 02/04/13 09:27 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Using lxde with openbox on rawhide and certain menu items under Preferences >> causes the following crash of X: >> >> from process 3610 (kevinm@ktmtoshiba). >> (EE) >>

Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop

On 04/08/13 06:52, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: >> Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause >> significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the >> rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide >> and see if your problems persist: >> http://fedoraproje

Re: lxde menu items causing X crash

On 04/02/13 13:06, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 12:45 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> I would happily use the nouveau driver (and was using it until going to the >> 3.8+ kernel where it became virtually >> unusable with noaccel turned on) > > Opti

evince 3.8.0 cores

%u %g %t e :: /proc/sys/kernel/core_pipe_limit 4 :: /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid 1 Any help greatly appreciated. -- Regards, -------- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

What is the reason that rar archive extraction support is not included in the 7z.so in the p7zip-plugins rpm? -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/16/13 15:47, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kevin Martin said: >> What is the reason that rar archive extraction support is not included in >> the 7z.so in the p7zip-plugins rpm? > > In the p7zip SRPM SPEC file: > ># RAR sources removed since th

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/25/13 07:10, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 04/25/2013 03:36 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> >>> Does it work with encrypted rar archives? >> >> >> Yes. Encrypted rar archives are supported and I have tested it explicitly >> as well >> >> https://c

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Martinwrote: > > > > > Hmm, installed updated file-roller and can't unpack a .rar file. Is > there something else that needs to be installed behind it? I > see the error "An error occurred

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/29/13 00:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Martin <mailto:ktm...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at

  1   2   >