Installation of gnome-applet-sensors fails with dependency issue:
>Error: Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 (fedora)
> Requires: libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
>You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
"Andre Robatino"
>>Antonio Olivares yahoo.com> writes:
>> Dear folks,
>>
>> I took the plunge to Gnome 3 and although I am playing around, I wish to add
some of the old functionality like
>> there was before, i.e, add a starting up script, in the old way one would
>> open
gnome session
I have been following your informative threads with grat interest. However, I
have not foune .xinitrc nor .desktop file in my /home directory. I used
nautilus with "show hidded files" selected. A dump of the home directory with
"tree -a" are attached.
Regards
- "Adam Williamson" wrote
Thanks
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 21:22 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> > I have been following your informative threads with grat interest.
> > However, I have not foune .xinitrc nor .desktop file in my /home
> > directory. I used n
Tim, your suggestion of installing avant-window-navigator and
awn-extras-applets is excellent.
Avant-Window-Navigator should receive greater exposure.
Learning Gnome 3 is not easy, but I must say that it grows on you. It is a nice
GUI...!
Manny
- "tim lauridsen" wrote:
On Sat,
Are any plans to implement the "force quit" applet in Gnome 3?
"force quit" saves time and effort closing unruly applications which would
otherwise require top or ps to id the process and then kill to terminate it.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admi
Thanks, just installed xkill
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 12:46 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> > Are any plans to implement the "force quit" applet in Gnome 3?
> >
> > "force quit" saves time and effort closing unruly appli
Give Gnome 3 a chance!
My first impression of Gnome 3 was awful. I came close to remove Fedora 15α on
account of Gnome 3.
However, I continued testing and gaining familiarity with the new program.
Today, after almost two months using Gnome3 I find it quite nice. As a matter
of fact, when I swi
Antonio my apologies for the typo.
The key I used is the Pause/Brake key, not Pose/Brake as I typed. The drop down
menu shows it as "Pause".
The key assignment is straightforward. And using it is very easy and fast.
Give it a try.
To define which key will become the Compose Key:
1. Click you
The gnome-control-center crashes every time the Spyder-3 color calibrator is
connected to the usb port in Fedora 15_x86_64. Is this a bug or an
incompatibility of the Spyder-3 Elite with Gnome-3? The Spyder-3 and Gnome-2
have work perfectly with Fedora 13 and 14.
Thanks.
--
test mailing list
When a Spyder color calibrator is connected to the usb port a cyclic loop
occurs as follows:
1.- The device is properly detected by the kernel.
2.- mtp-probe checks the device.
3.- mtp-probe finds that the device is not a mtp device.
4.- The kernel then disconnects the device.
5.- T
Suppressing the messages will not solve the problem. The colour calibration
fails.
Furthermore while the loop cycles the box is unusable. The only way to regain
control is to unplug the device from the usb port.
- "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> Seeing the subj msgs each boot in rawhide. D
After last night update yum fails with message:
Could not parse metalink
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-debug-f15&arch=x86_64
error was
No repomd file
Error: File /var/cache/yum/x86_64/15/updates-debuginfo/metalink.xml does not
exist
Files updated last n
Interesting. My since alpha came out I have had in /etc/yum/repos.d
fedora-update.repo enabled and the updates-debuginfo repository disabled.
Regards,
Manny
updates-debuginfo repository was not enabled enabled
- "James Laska" wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:51 -0400,
:3.2.29-5.fc15
Replaced:
testdisk-doc.x86_64 0:6.11-9.fc15
Complete!
Regards,
Manny
- "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
> ergodic wrote:
>
> > Interesting. My since alpha came out I have had in
> /etc/yum/repos.d
>
Thanks Kevin and Adam
You are correct I have "yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-2.fc15.noarch"
installed.
It has been removed and yum is working again.
Regards :-)
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:08 -0400, ergodic wrote:
>
Will do.
Thanks again.
Manny.
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:34 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> > Thanks Kevin and Adam
> >
> > You are correct I have
> "yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-2.fc15.noarch" installed.
>
You can also use the Disk Utility(my preference). It offers a "Safe Removal"
option
which actually turns the power off to the device.
- "Adam Miller" wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19:28PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you coul
- "drago01" gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ralf Corsepius freenet.de>
> wrote:
> > On 05/31/2011 09:17 AM, drago01 wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Pasha R
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jason D.
> Clintonjasonclinton.com>
> >>>
Welcome!
- Original Message -
> Hi
> This is my first mail in community, and so glad to have the
> opportunity to join this team and say hello, my name is FQ, and I am
> a former IBMer working in STG(hardware group), ATS(advanced
> technical support) team since 2003, the last job role is
Nouveau problem. Multi-booting F-15 and F-16. Nouveau works perfectly in in
F15, but it does not wok in F-16. I have filed a bug against it
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755336).
Excerpts from bug report:
-Four clean install attempts
-The first boot crashes the system after the
You are correct! Specially when the brand new release crashes at first boot
after installation. Happy Holiday! - Original Message -
> It seems to me that the appropriate distinction is not between stable
> releases and releases in testing, but rather between testing-related
> messages and
are turned away when their first run after installation locks up
> the box requiring a hard reboot
> Thanks again.
> - Forwarded Message -
> > On 11/23/2011 10:54 AM, ergodic wrote:
> > > Nouveau problem. Multi-booting F-15 and F-16. Nouveau works
> > > perfec
worked right out.
As I mentioned, I have been using Fedora since version 3. Maybe because of
the greater program complexity or whatever, there is a need to raise the
standards.
Cheers
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 12:46 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> > Wish you an
I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
Best luck1
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 14:41 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> > Regardless there is something that changed from F-15 to F-16. F-15
> > runs
Adam your offer is typical of what I like about Linux and Red Hat (My early
steps in Linux were with Red Hat 7.2). Thanks.
I have a bug filed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755336)
Thanks again.
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wr
---
> Adam Williamson ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on
> 24/11/2011 21:55:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> >> I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
> >> F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
> > If you
on
> > 24/11/2011 21:55:
> > > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> > >> I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
> > >> F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
> > > If you report the bug, with appro
Richard, first of all thanks a lot for your work and efforts.
I have tested the new update "colord-0.1.15-1.fc16.x86_64". It ran very
smoothly
with no operational difficulties or problems. Tow different monitors were
calibrated.
Equipment Data:
Mother Board:
ASUS P5K DELUXE/WIFI-AP Intel Mothe
No problem.
Done.
M.
- Original Message -
> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 15:38 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> > Richard, first of all thanks a lot for your work and efforts.
> >
> > I have tested the new update "colord-0.1.15-1.fc16.x86_64". It ran
> >
Matej I tip my hat to you for your comments! What a nice and precise reply to
the request for help!
Happy Holidays to all.
M.
- Original Message -
> On 11.12.2011 02:43, David wrote:
> > First suggestion. Turn *off* the html.
> >
> > Second suggestion. Report your question again.
>
>
Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as failing: "DISK
HAS MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
Palimsest in Fedora 17 beta reports the same disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as "OK"
trust, which one is accurate?
However, I am inclined to believe that is the way Maxtor reports the parameter
in question.
Thanks to all,
Cheers.
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:35 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
>
> Pal
Executing poweroff in F-17 (x86_64 up to date) defaults to the "Authentication
is required for powering off the system while other users are logged in"
snippet.
Only one user (user1) actually logged in, however results from "who" and
"users" show otherwise:
# who
user1 :0 2012-07-23 13:04 (
Thanks for your reply Adam.
Why then reboot does not complain? Reboot executes immediatly.
All those directives link to consolehelper or to systemctl, which should ask
for authentication if another user is logged.
- Original Message -
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, ergodic wrote:
> Execut
Karel your philosophy is correct. I have seen this issue when my grandchildren
complained that they could not turn of their box after it was was upgraded to
F-17. That is why I filed Bug 843299.
Manny
- Original Message -
Dne St 25. července 2012 11:46:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
It is clear that different scenarios require different rules.
I have installed Fedora for three different friends. All at different physical
locations from my place. These people have no computer knowledge, so giving
them elevated permissions spells disaster. However they must to be able to
This is also happening with Fedora 17.
- Original Message -
On 17.12.2012 10:07, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
> F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the size of
> the root filesystem:
>
>> df
> Filesys
Well...Then why?
[root@xxx]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 3046148 0 3046148 0% /dev
tmpfs3056848 252 3056596 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs3056848 1440 3055408 1% /run
/dev/sda2 15346336 6825044
Jachim, which df (coreutils) are you using?
I am using: coreutils-8.15-9.fc17.x86_64
- Original Message -
I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
Screenshot attached.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, ergodic < g...@embarqmail.com > wrote:
Before I file a Bugzilla, has anyone have problems with
kernel-3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64?
It will not boot in my machine. Asus P5K Delux, Core2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz, 6GiB
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Ankur thanks for for you repliy.
I will hold until next kernel update and if the problem persist
I will BZ it. In the interim I will try to debug the boot failure
Best regards
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 18:40 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> It will not boot in my machine
Can not boot with either 'kernel-3.10.4-200.fc19.x86_64' or
'kernel-3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64'
Has any one had this problem?
Currently running with kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64.
Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
well
with the previous kernels.
Cheers
- Original Message -
On 2013-08-04 20:45 (GMT-0400) ergodic composed:
> Can not boot with either 'kernel-3.10.4-200.fc19.x86_64' or
> 'kernel-3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64'
> Has any one had this problem?
> Currently runn
open them?
On 5 August 2013 04:00, ergodic < g...@embarqmail.com > wrote:
Felix and Sandro, thanks for your replies.
Basically booting fails defaulting to the maintenance mode option.
In maintenance mode parsing the 'journalctl' log shows the following failure
messa
Core i7 3770K 3.5GHz
Mobo: Asus P8Z77-V LK LGA 1155 Z77 ATX
Mem : Crucial Ballistix 16GB DR3 1600
HD : Seagate 1 TB and Samsung 160 GB
Thanks you all.
- Original Message -
On 08/05/2013 07:33 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 08:45:26PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
&g
Original Message -
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:08:37 -0400,
ergodic wrote:
>No I do not. The only system change was the kernel update.
>Downgrading to kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64 or earlier
>restores system functionality. Thus my conclusion that the
>problem is kernel related.
Nevertheless beautiful!
- Original Message -
>
> La beauté est dans l'oeil du spectateur,
> http://goo.gl/W4AwXE
>
>
> poma
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
--
test mailing list
test@lists.
Is this a high jack? Hope that Fedora and Red Hat are not becoming political
organizations nows.
Utterly disgusting! Keep politics out.
To Temlakos and George R Goffe: I completely oppose the expressed views.
- On Jun 9, 2019, at 9:47 PM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 6/9/19 6:09 PM, Jonathan Ca
Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
not political forums.
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:17 -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Is this a high jack?
>
> It's a mailing
Hope you are right!
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:13:05PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
>> not political forums.
>
> It seems that there
51 matches
Mail list logo
