On Qui, 2015-04-23 at 08:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:12:48 +0300
> Pavlo Rudyi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 13:38 +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
> > > I've rebuilt vlc and missing deps for Fedora 22 (64 bit only):
> > > https://mega.co.nz/#F!lswAQKYI!3Phi71gm7eT
Hi,
yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be
marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the
default , next release to obsolete it .
Now, I need to find out what broken dependencies do we have and where ,
and dnf doesn't show it. How I do it now ?
On Seg, 2015-05-04 at 22:21 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 04.05.2015 18:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be
> > marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the
> > default , next release t
On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> with:
> >> yum update
> >> I got :
> >> Yum command has been deprecated, redirecti
On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote:
> > On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >> with:
> > >> yum
On Sáb, 2015-05-09 at 23:30 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> Does anyone have Virtualbox working
> on FC22 ?
yes now we got on rpmfusion :
VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm
* Mon May 04 2015 Sérgio Basto - 4.3.26-3
- Added diff_smap_4.patch from https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13961 ,
m
On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> Yes, Below is why I asked the question ;
>
> [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup
> bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory
> [root@fedora22desk ~]#
>
>
>
> root@fedora22desk ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox
> Name:
On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 01:27 +1000, Adrian wrote:
>
>
> On 10/05/15 00:49, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> > > Yes, Below is why I asked the question ;
> > >
> > > [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxd
On Sáb, 2015-06-20 at 04:10 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 20.06.2015 04:00, Josh Stone wrote:
> > On 06/19/2015 06:47 PM, poma wrote:
> >> On 20.06.2015 03:30, Josh Stone wrote:
> >>> On 06/19/2015 05:51 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 05:16 PM, poma wrote:
> >
> > This is exactly the
On Dom, 2015-06-21 at 23:47 +0200, poma wrote:
> Háu kola
>
>
> $ lspci -d :0016 -knn
> 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller [0400]: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16
> (CX23416) Video Decoder [:0016] (rev 01)
> Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 150 [0070:8801]
>
Hi,
On Qui, 2015-07-23 at 09:25 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> (since i have my updates-testing repo enabled, this would seem to be
> the right place to ask this.)
>
> along with many others, i tried to install (actually, upgrade to)
> skype 4.3 on my 64-bit fedora laptop, went to the skype
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 06:04 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
> > Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf
> > repolist' say?
>
> i've run "sudo dnf update" a number of times, tells me "Nothing to
> do". and:
>
> $ dnf repolist
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one
> I ran into with dnf...
>
>
> I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I
> pushed it myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the
> "
On Ter, 2014-09-16 at 07:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Not strictly a "test" question but.
>
> I rebuilt NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6.git20140704 from F21 for F20 and
> installed it. After 2 days I have not seen
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059597. It normally crops up
> w
On Qui, 2014-09-18 at 12:27 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hello F21 testers,
>
> anybody runs skype-4.3.0.37-fc16.i586 in F21 with pulseaudio sound? On
> my box, skype does not produce any sound. Trying the same in F20 runs
> flawlessly (with sound and identical skype rpm).
I have to test it bu
On Qua, 2014-09-24 at 11:08 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Nikos Roussos wrote:
>
> > On September 24, 2014 5:44:40 PM EEST, "Robert P. J. Day"
> > wrote:
> > > watching any sort of youtube video is excruciating ... while audio
> > >is typically, i will frequently get *m
On Sáb, 2014-09-27 at 11:01 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:36:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 10:44 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to
> > > say it's nad-grindingly slow
On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 08:59 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I'm running an F20/KDE VM with sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20 installed from
> updates-testing.
>
> In trying to do a
>
> fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
>
> I get
>
> WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
> sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20.x86_64
Hi,
I'd like add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619
as blocker to release 21 . Please read last comments #95 still #101
On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 11:26 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> ==
> #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
>
On Sex, 2015-09-04 at 10:32 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/04/15 08:17, Aka Ídviare wrote:
> > #Output /var/lib/dkms/vboxhost/4.2.32/build/make.log
> > http://www.fpaste.org/263410/
>
> You seem to be using a rather old version of Vbox at version 4.2.32. I
> believe the latest 5.0.X versions
On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/09/2015 alle 18.50 -0400, Donavan Lance ha scritto:
> > using the new 'dnf system-upgrade' utility
>
> I have try this kind of update, but:
>
> > [root@dodo:~]# rpm -q dnf
> > dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch
> > [root@dodo:~]# dnf
On Qui, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> Everyone:
>
> This morning I updated to the latest kernel. And promptly shut down
> and rebooted the immediate previous kernel, which is the Last Known
> Good.
what kernel ?
>
> Here's why:
>
> 1. The kernel, once again, is prone to an annoy
On Seg, 2015-09-28 at 13:30 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 11:09, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > can not login to bugzilla, also the bug ID of a known bug is rejected.
> > Currently problems there?
> > Kind Regards
> >
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> I had problems too after RH BZ was updated (
On Ter, 2015-09-29 at 11:51 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were
> 483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today.
> I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular.
>
> However, 'dnf upd
Hello,
On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 14:41 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just FTR,
what FTR means ?
> > Bugzilla doesn't not accept weak password anymore .
>
> not exactly true, now I have weaker password than before Bugzilla forced me
> to change it
>
> and by "weaker" I mean _really weak_ .
On Sex, 2015-10-02 at 12:37 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > Maybe my assumption was not totally correct but now bugzilla says:
> >
> > The password must contain at least one:
> >
> > letter
> > special character
> > digit
>
> and 8 characters minimum length
if Bugzilla enforce 8 charact
On Sex, 2015-10-02 at 17:11 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Sérgio Basto composed on 2015-10-02 13:23 (UTC+0100):
>
> > On Sex, 2015-10-02 at 12:37 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
>
> >> > Maybe my assumption was not totally correct but now bugzilla says:
>
> >> &
On Sex, 2015-10-09 at 03:02 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> My laptop is a 64-bit Acer. I installed via:
> [root@linux joerg]# dnf install
> http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu.rpm.
> Acroread runs ok.
dnf install
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix
TOP POSTING TC5 is before alfa , you mean Fedora final candidate RC5 ?
or what ever ?
when is not specific means that you are talking about pre alfa composes.
please be more specific .
Thanks,
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 09:39 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> I have just downloaded Fedora TC5 and
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
> days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases.
> Here's the first:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_network_smb
wiki sa
On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 18:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 01:35 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few
> > > days
Hi,
I tried upgrade , with fedup [1]
I tried a no conventional update, yum localinstall /system-upgrade/*rpm
but now system doesn't boot normally , just boots when I put debug in
kernel boot parameters on grub .
I think is systemd boot order , looking to
journalctl -b | grep -i faile , I see
On Seg, 2013-12-30 at 00:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. Now things have calmed down a bit in Fedora 20 and Rawhide, I
> have time to write this mail!
>
> Many of you may already know that there was a significant issue with
> upgrades to Fedora 20 around release day - 2013-12-17.
>
On Qui, 2014-01-02 at 10:25 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:00:15PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > but why just boots with kernel with debug boot options , and what I
> > should do to but with quiet parameter or in default mode ?
>
>
On Ter, 2014-01-07 at 18:08 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 05:49 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:49:13PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> Jan 07 12:07:13 lx120e.htt-consult.com lvm[12503]:
> >> /dev/fedora_19/swap: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 4096:
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 14:29 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This just happened to me. I say "reboot" because it didn't actually
> reboot. It sort of closed everything that was running down and gave me a
> screen with a X shaped mouse on it. If I went to a virtual terminal and
> tried to login
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 14:47 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 03:39 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I saw some activity of dnf but I don't use or need dnf in F20, so I
> > remove it from all my systems with anaconda as dependency, also don't
> > need
On Seg, 2014-03-17 at 10:23 +1100, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> And the link to the bug
> is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076981
>
and this one ? , is also about logging :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073128
>
> On 17 March 2014 10:22, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> H
On Sáb, 2014-03-29 at 16:02 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > I noticed that xulrunner-28.0.1.fc21 "failed to build".
> >
> > Running latest firefox with older xulrunner spews my journal, etc.
>
> Firefox no longer needs xulrunner.
I am removing prelink (prelink -ua before yum remove prelink) from a
rawh
On Ter, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
> > result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
>
> http://fedoramagazine.org/statu
On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 18:39 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:37:26AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > Port pdftk to openjdk?
> I am not sure if there is really anything to port. At
> http://www.pdflabs.com/docs/install-pdftk-on-redhat-or-centos/
> you can find pdftk-2.02-1.
On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 20:45 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 08:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 18:39 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:37:26AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >>> Port pdftk to openjdk?
>
Hi, Recently on Fedora 20 , the shutdown stuck one minute and ends up
with close session-1.scope stopping timed out , any clue what might be ,
I reverse kernel , NwtworkManager updates but still the same I use kde
workspace .
also I see that behavior on a vm with rawhide
TIA,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Qui, 2014-06-12 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I noticed this morning the /etc/X11/xorg.conf no longer seems to be being
> > used and that I need to put the config in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d to get it
> > used. Since I have
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 09:11 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > Phoeonix.com is reporting that Linus has found a code generation
> > error in 4.9 and has switched back to 4.8.
>
> The bug existed from 4.5.0 up, so switching back
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 18:24 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
> What I did was that I installed
> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with libvirt.
> Then I clone it and used it to do the brancing.
>
> I did following:
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 23:31 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
> > On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
> > Jon Ingason wrote:
> >
> >> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
> >> What I did was that I installed
> >> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_
On Seg, 2014-07-28 at 00:06 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2014-07-27 23:36, Sérgio Basto skrev:
> > On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 23:31 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> >> 2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
> >>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
> >>> Jon Ingason
Hi,
I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from
Fedora 20 to Fedora 21.
Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21,
fedup is supposed to work ?
using yum how I tell to yum that rpmfusion rawhide is relversion 21 ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
test mailing list
On Sex, 2014-08-01 at 12:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from
> Fedora 20 to Fedora 21.
>
> Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21,
> fedup is supposed to work ?
> using yum how I
On Sex, 2016-12-23 at 15:52 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> In gnome-shell if I go to restart (upper right corner, power button
> icon) I have an 'install pending software updates' now for two days,
> but there's no other notification that there are pending software
> updates.
>
> Is this change in b
On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > and journalctl has t
On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> ...
> >
> > and journalctl has the entry
> > "sendmail.service: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable (yet?)
> > after start: No such file or directory".
> See htt
On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:04 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2016
On Sex, 2016-06-24 at 10:12 +0800, Dev wrote:
> I found opensource alternative - https://jitsi.org
I found 2 rpm spec to build it on Fedora :
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:zhonghuaren/jitsi/jit
si.spec?expand=1
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi/blob/master/resources/install/rpm/
On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you
> can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated
> client.
and can we have one private hosted server ?
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 14:17 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> just saw in F23 - this might also be valid for the F23 followers:
>
> Aktualisiert:
> audit.x86_64 2.6.5-
> 1.fc23
> audit-libs.x86_64 2.6.5-
> 1.fc23
On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 23:47 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> not possible to run, the result of a "run trial" I had included,
> after successful dnf update, where devede beta1 is in. Thank You for
> Your advice, I will investigate a little bit and file a bug. After
> downgrade the previous versi
On Qua, 2016-08-17 at 08:25 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> after production of DVD iso out of MP4 file, F24 breaks down, no
> shutdown, the screen is dark and the blue lamp, which signals the
> system is on, is still on? The produced iso is complete and can be
> burned successfully with Brase
Hello ,
mplayer and vlc are rpmfusion packages therefore you should report it
on rpmfusion-users maliling list
, not here .
Thanks
On Seg, 2016-10-03 at 10:21 -0700, stan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running F25. On Friday, mplayer worked as expected. I then
> updated to the latest updates (I have
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 15:46 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
>
Hi,
Finally someone seems that found the mystery with firewalld, we need
open on source port ! more details in [1], Adam can you make it happen
for F25 ? also we need test it .
Thanks,
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297235
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Qua, 2014-12-03 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> >> fedup gave me the following warnings:
> >>
> >>kde-runtime-libs-4.14.3-2.fc20.x86_64 requires exiv2-
> >> libs-0.23-5.fc20.x86_64,
> >> OpenE
On Dom, 2014-12-07 at 02:15 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I have a Samsung ML-1740 laser printer which in F20 and below would work
> immediately after install, even though splix wasn't installed. I believe it
> was necessary for foomatic to be installed, and in one previous release it
> wasn't in
On Ter, 2014-12-16 at 19:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I just noticed that the Fedora-Server-netinst.iso appears not to be
> > part of F21 release. I could not find it listed here
> > http://torrents.fedoraproject.org/. I sometimes
On Ter, 2014-12-23 at 19:46 -0800, Mick wrote:
> Hi Adam;
> thanks for trying.
> It made no difference.
>
> The message was:
> [root@localhost ~]# rpm --rebuilddb
> error: rpmdb: BDB0641 __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: unexpected file
> type or format
> error: cannot open Packages in
recovery process
>
> On Tue, 12/23/14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 9:45 PM
>
> On Ter, 2014-12
On Qui, 2015-01-22 at 13:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an
> existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those
> except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an
> existing partition with
On Qua, 2015-01-28 at 16:05 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> > I *know* this is going to be a bit of a pain to get used to. But the
> > increased security is worth it. Super simple passwords will no longer be
> > allowed, but it is still easy
On Ter, 2015-03-10 at 08:41 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: rpmfusion-free/22/x86_64
> [root@linux joerg]#
>
> Has anyone an idea? But possibly I have to wait for Beta only.
RPMFusion doesn't have F22 branch because we are waiting for a new
infrastructure , bu
On Qua, 2015-03-11 at 10:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Usually they don't branch in the same way as Fedora. They point their
> "rawhide" repos at Fedora Branched and ignore Fedora Rawhide for some
> months.
>
> Last they did that on 09-Dec-2014:
>
> $ md5sum rpmfusion-free-release-*
> b
On Sex, 2016-03-18 at 01:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The F24 lives don't contain a rescue kernel or generate the
> corresponding
> grub entry (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317709
> ). Is
> there a way to install the rescue kernel if it was not done during
> the
> initial i
Hi,
kernel-4.5.0-0.rc7.git0.2.fc24 have almost 20 days
I see here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
many kernels updates for F24 , but none is in bodhi
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
Am I missing something ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
t
On Ter, 2016-03-29 at 21:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 20:28 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Sérgio Basto
>
yeah ß is not an β
alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F#Graphically_similar_letters
However, the reverse substitution of using German "ß" as a surrogate
for Greek "β" once was common when describing beta test versions of
application programs for
On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote:
> >
> > How do you type the Greek beta
> > from the keyboard (I use US dead keys—always and exclusively)?
>
> One way is C-S-u 0 3 b 2 Space
what you mean by C-S-u ? can't figure out
> Not entire
On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 14:41 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:26:41PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote:
> > > >
&g
subject fixed :-)
On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:01 -0600, Peter G. wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > yeah ß is not an β
> > alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta )
> I never knew that there was a real beta character! es-zett is
> easy to type: just ri
Adam Williamson wrote:
> * TC1 DVD install fails on dependency issues, so we need a TC2
> soon without those
Hi, I can confirm that, but I could install minimal system .
Initially system doesn't start d-bus, after check /var/log/messages I
saw that was a selinux restriction.
After disable selin
On Seg, 2013-04-15 at 22:51 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
Hi, may I test upgrades from F17 to F19 ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Qua, 2013-04-17 at 20:54 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Is there a trick to getting F19 and VirtualBox to play nice?
>
> Host:
> Fedora 18 x86_64
> VBox 4.2.12
> 3ghz quad core
>
> When I load the latest F19 Alpha LiveCD ISO it takes about 5 minutes
> just to get to the desktop. Once th
On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Are using vbox from rpmfusion ?
>
> Please see my previous email:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-April/114890.html
I saw it before ask
&
On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 09:43 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 09:34 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >> On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>> Are using vbox from rpmfusion ?
> >
On Seg, 2013-04-22 at 12:47 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> My best operational 32 bit machine has an 800 MHz Pentium III,
> two USB ports, and 1.5 GB ram.
>
> It has a network card that can install via PXE but the
> install fails when a root cannot be found.
>
> The USB port could
On Sex, 2013-04-26 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/26/13 08:30, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I wanted to do some fedup testing and used
> >
> > fedup-cli --network 19 --debuglog /root/fed.log
> >
> > This failed with...
> >
> > zlib-1.2.7-10.fc19.x86_64.rpm |
On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 13:08 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 12:29 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > What is the "official version" and how does it differ from
> > the Rpmfusion version?
>
> https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
>
> It doesn't differ from the
On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 21:36 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I use mock to local build packages.
> I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> How I fix it ?
have you internet in the computer ?
> GEN gnome-control-center.1
> I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
> http://
On Qua, 2013-05-08 at 21:27 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> Today's rawhide breaks this
>
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
> gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> gnustep-base-1.24.4-5.fc20.x86_64
>
> Error Summary
On Sex, 2013-05-17 at 17:03 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Installing F19 mail server ... "clamupdate" user/group problem:
> >
> > [root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav
> > clamav-data clamav-server clamav-server-s
On Sáb, 2013-05-18 at 10:09 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2013-05-17 at 17:03 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > > Installing F19 mai
On Seg, 2013-05-20 at 19:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 03:24 PM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Giving up. Revetring all to NM and all is ok, with IP FORWARDING
> > (/proc/sys/net/ip_forward = 1).
> > I do not understand why initially it did not work (I only copied back
> > th
On Seg, 2013-05-20 at 19:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 03:24 PM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Giving up. Revetring all to NM and all is ok, with IP FORWARDING
> > (/proc/sys/net/ip_forward = 1).
> > I do not understand why initially it did not work (I only copied back
> > th
On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 13:23 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice ldconfig
> > complaining about
> > a truncated file
> >
> > Transaction test succeeded
> > Running transaction
> > Installing
On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 19:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 06/02/2013 06:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > On 06/02/2013 02:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 13:23 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > > On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank
On Ter, 2013-06-11 at 10:31 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> It seems the name of the Fedora 19 release is getting corrupted in
> various places.
Could you specify where ? to fix it
> It might be breaking some scripts as well.
>
> It might be wise to eliminate the special charac
On Sáb, 2013-07-13 at 11:38 +0800, 李国钦 wrote:
> Error: can't get boot images.
> The installation repo isn't available.
> You need to specify one with --instrepo.
so just add:
--instrepo
http://mirrors.eu.kernel.org/fedora/releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os/
or for i386
--instrepo
http://mirrors.eu.kerne
On Sex, 2013-08-02 at 17:45 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 05:31 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > This is not really the right list for the issue, but I suggest you
> > consulted the log file as indicated. Problem might be as simple as not
> > having kernel-headers or gcc installed.
>
On Qui, 2013-09-12 at 10:19 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 09:53 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes:
> >
> >> having a problem after updating from kernel3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 to
> >> kernel-3.11.0-200.fc19.x86_64: The vbox mudules are not built du
On Qui, 2013-09-12 at 09:42 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 09:18 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> > Hi all testers,
> >
> > having a problem after updating from kernel3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 to
> > kernel-3.11.0-200.fc19.x86_64: The vbox mudules are not built during
> > reboot. I saw
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
