Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:14 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > So, during Fedora 32 Final blocker review, a bug relating to "user > switching" came up for review: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817708 > > I dug into the question of whether we have tended to consider the

Re: Proposal to adjust final criterion for backgrounds

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:18:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It kinda harks back to a time where we had more custom artwork, I think > > - like boot splashes and stuff? I don't totally remember, but that was > > basically it, at th

Re: Proposal to adjust final criterion for backgrounds

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Well, you could check based on EVR of fedora-release. Stable release > > is always has Release field bumped to 1, and unstable is below 1. > > True --

Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user > > > switching - that is, switching b

Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:05 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 12:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > >

Re: btrfs testing

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:43 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > > After the QA meeting today, I spent a few hours trying the get Rawhide > 0703 WS Live installed with btrfs. > > I have Rawhide 0703 WS Live on a thumb drive. I know this works fine > when taking the default for the disk. I was tryi

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Hey folks! > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > > this got accepted as a release blocker: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:48 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:44 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > All of this, the criteria, and the UI support for btrfs are from the > > many years old proposal to make btrfs the default filesystem. In the > > beginning, it was not ready, but

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote: > > On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > >> So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > >> this got accepted as a release blocker: > >> > >> http

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-24 at 07:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:00 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > > > > > I understand them. The point is, for them and even us (the > > > installer) > > > is work

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 2

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > &g

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > &

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:30 PM Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > I also think there are other perspectives that might at least > > potentially be useful here. Right now we've mainly heard from a couple > > of community folks who are very passionate about btrfs, and Red Hat > > folks from anaconda/kerne

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:23 AM wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 13:25 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > > > Josh, to be fair, I can see Neal's point here. In a way you seem > > > > to be > > > > kinda sending him in circles here: "anaco

Re: Automatic blocker addition proposal: desktop background criterion

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:59 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! So, it was suggested at the blocker review meeting on Monday > that violations of the Basic desktop background criterion: > > "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last > two stable releases." > > sho

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hi there. We just learned that there's an opportunity to have a brand new > Fedora Media Writer 5.0 (with a completely redone UI, but using the same > background code) together with the Fedora 36 release. The timing is tight, > but we agreed

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:29 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does > this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion. > > That is really not how it works, neither for GNO

Re: Release criteria proposal: require GNOME Shell extension install/remove to work

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 3:35 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! > > So a bug came up at today's blocker review meeting: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106868 > > it takes a minute to parse, but the tl;dr is that right now in Fedora > 37, you can't go to https://extensions.gno

Re: Heads up: GNOME 43.0 megaupdate is in testing

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 4:30 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Just a quick heads up that the GNOME 43.0 final release megaupdate is > now in F37 updates-testing: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0bd68bbb43 > > This is the GNOME version that's we'll be shipping F37 Fina

Re: Video issue

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 11:23 AM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > > This is something I first saw at first branch and I have continued > monitoring it since. There has been no change. > > The problem is that MP4, and AVI videos will not play on Totem. This is > probably not a blocker based on the

Re: 6.1 kernel in F36/F37?

On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 2:48 PM Andre Robatino wrote: > > What's going on with the 6.1 kernel for stable releases? Normally, there are > Koji builds even if it's not intended for stable releases yet, but the only > Koji build for the 6.1 kernel was for Rawhide. Is there an issue causing it > to

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > > > "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an > > existing OS X installation, install

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:56 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > > > >

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release > criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is: > > > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common > application content - that i

Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

Hey all, I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working gaming experience in Fedora Linux releases. This is motivated by the issue we had in the F37 cycle where glibc broke popular multiplayer games[1]. I was reminded of thi

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 5:14 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and > > Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a work

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 2:28 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 08:20 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and > > Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working ga

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a > > > blo

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > Hello > > > This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update. > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0]. > We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship > with Toolbx. A

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:00 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM Sumantro Mukherjee >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello >> > >> > >> > This h

Re: Make toolbx a crit-path package

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:00 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 10:09 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 PM Adam Williamson > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 19:57 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > Hey Folks! > > > > > > > > To

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > I notice that: > > sudo dnf group upgrade --with-optional Multimedia > > produces the error: > > No match for group package "gimp-heif-plugin" > > Seems like "gimp-heif-plugin" no longer exists in the repos. Is this a > bug in the sp

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:20 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > On 12/20/23 08:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > >> > >> I notice that: > >> > >> sudo dnf group upgrade --with-optional Multimedia > >&

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:29 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/19/23 14:19, Ian Laurie wrote: > > On 12/20/23 08:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > >>> > >>> I notice that: > >>> >

Re: gnome-session-46-alpha-1 has broken Budgie sessions

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 7:52 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > I rolled back to a working backup of Rawhide Budgie and selectively > upgraded until I could no longer log into a Budgie session, and it's the > upgrade to gnome-session-46-alpha-1 that did it. Previous 45.0-6 works. > > Further, downgrading g

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 Available Now!

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:45 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC) > rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 is now > > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > > testing! For more inf

Re: F40 Final test request: NVIDIA RTX 3000 GPUs

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024, 11:47 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! See also the thread between AV and Frantisek ("changes to > nouveau driver in kernel 6.8.2 and higher?") > > Can anyone else who has a similar NVIDIA GPU please try booting the > Workstation live image - > > https://dl.fedoraprojec

Re: The Multimedia group is missing in 41

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:41 PM Ian Laurie via test wrote: > > There appears to be no Multimedia group [yet] in Fedora 41, is this > intentional? > > If so the wiki page: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/installing-plugins-for-playing-movies-and-music/ > > will need updating. >

Re: desktop spins, btrfs copy test request

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for testers: > - Fedora 33 > - User home is on Btrfs (clean installed or converted, in a subvolume > or not, these details won't matter) > - using any spin other than Workstation (kde, lxqt, xfce, etc are all > requested).

Re: snap question

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:59 PM David wrote: > > I wanted to try to learn something about snaps, so I installed what > is written below: > >sudo snap install mate-wayland --edge --classic > > But in the log-in screen, I switched to the MATE desktop environment, > and just got a bunch of gi

Re: fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 1:20 PM Stephen Snow wrote: > > Judging from the image at the link provided I would say you need to select > your installation destination. > Actually, it looks like MirrorManager wasn't responding quickly enough for getting it to setup properly. It's supposed to autoconf

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 🐞💬

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > * Using Magic Text for voting and admin is awkward and error-prone. > Better UI for this would be really helpful. In addition, the state > isn't automatically updated when you vote or mark a decision, so I > always find myself manually r

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:19 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > == How To Test == > > See QA test cases : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases > > > > We also have regular tests days, for example > > https://fedorama

Wayland and basic graphics mode

Hey all, During the final days of Fedora Linux 34 development, it was discovered that Plasma Wayland hangs when kernel modesetting isn't available[1]. It was resolved for F34 with a downstream change to sddm that checks if "nomodeset" is set and disables Wayland sessions accordingly. However, thi

Re: Fedora 35 Wayland and Darktable hard lock

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:39 PM Leander Hutton via test wrote: > > Hello, I recently upgraded to FL35 and noticed that Darktable under a Wayland > session causes a hard lock of the whole session. Both the package that ships > with the distro and the release version compiled from source. I did a

Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 8:36 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 11:43 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Background > > -- > > > > Every release since possibly the dawn of time (or, at least, [Fedora > > Core 5][1]), we make a [Common Bugs page][2] on the wiki. This is where

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:25 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote: >> >> "dnf install foo bar" > > > This is a single operation, comparable to having multiple packages installed > via graphical package manager, not scheduling multiple operations a

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 10:50 AM John Mellor wrote: > > On 2021-11-08 9:31 a.m., Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:25 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >>> "dnf install foo bar&quo

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#Bootloader_disk_selection > > "The installer must allow the user to choose which disk the system > bootloader will be installed to, and to choose not to install one at > all. " >

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 6:54 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 2:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#

Re: dnf system-upgrade conflict

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:46 AM Alessio wrote: > > It is not the first time that performing a system-upgrade from 35 to > 36, I get: > > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package mlocate-0.26-31.fc35.x86_64 > - package plocate-1.1.15-2.fc36.x86_64 conflicts with mlocate > provided by mloc

Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:50 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > A large computer vendor with whom we have a friendly relationship would like > to update the image they're shipping on their systems so that 1) new users > don't have quite so many updates immediately and 2) auiu newer kernel helps > with

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:04 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > > > On 20/01/2021 11:11, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:44 PM Mark Pearson > > wrote: > > > > Release cadence is once. We just can't update our preload images that > > often - there's a

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and optionally also other desktops? If not (o

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka >> wrote: >> >&

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:01 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> GNOME applications pull in most of the GNOME desktop as dependencies. >> Properly developed KDE applications will pull in the KF5 libraries and >> occa

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:19 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:01 AM Kamil Paral wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> >> >

Re: How To Test pipewire On F33?

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:28 PM Qiyu Yan wrote: > > My procedure: > > 1. sudo swap pulseaudio pipewire-pulseaudio --allowerasing > --enablerepo=updates-testing > > If you lost sound: > > 2. sudo systemctl enable --global pipewire-pulse.socket > > The second step should be done automatically, but

Re: Need help with btrfs.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 02:58:00PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > We should find out if there's more widespread corruption. The basic > > command to scrub that particular Btrfs file system is: > > > > sudo btrfs scrub start /mnt > > It's k

Re: Need help with btrfs.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:50 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:40:19PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > There are a few different types of full-disk backup, but if it's > > file-based and the atimes are modified, that's the intent of the > > backup process. The atimes are used t

Upgrade on F34 -> F34 on x11 utils split

Hey all, I attempted to do a distro-sync to upgrade my system to latest F34 pre-release packages, but I got the following error: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/iceauth conflicts between attempted installs of xorg-x11-server-utils-7.7-39.fc34.x86_64 and iceauth-1.0.8-1.fc34.x86_64

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 12:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:24:38PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with > > pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name? > > If anything, I think it's a lot less common than

Re: [Suggestion] Add `noatime` mount option

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:37 PM TheEvilSkeleton wrote: > > I'd like to suggest to use noatime mount option for btrfs. > > I've come across two posts about combining atime with btrfs. Unfortunately > those two should not be combined, as explained here: > https://lwn.net/Articles/499293/; and her

Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 3:29 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 09:07 -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > Thanks for following up. I was mostly trying to gauge if this was common > > enough it should be a proposed blocker. > > > > Now, not to be a stick in the mud, but what other co

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:09 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: >> >> Proposed Beta Criteria: >> >> Release identification >> A fedora-release package containing the correct names and information and a >> fedora-repos package containing the correct

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:39 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > > Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: > > > ... >

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:39 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: > > ... > > sudo dnf upgrade > > > > Breaks with: > > > > transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. > >- file /usr/lib64

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey folks, > > A few moons ago, I volunteered to write a Beta Release Criteria. The idea > is to set a "criteria" > to have Beta images with Updates Testing enabled by default. Note, we *do* > this and have been doing this for some time a

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:07 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM Neal Gompa via kde > wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released >> yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedo

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:07 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM Neal Gompa via kde > > wrote: > >> > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> The candidate release com

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:09 PM Brandon Nielsen via test wrote: > > On 10/22/24 4:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released > > yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedora KDE is the be

Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

Hey folks, The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedora KDE is the best this cycle! Kamil Paral provided some instructions on how to do this just after Fedora Linux 41 Beta went out[2] and that guidance applies here. In partic

Re: Where did dnf cache go? Where did fedora-qa on IRC go?

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 3:12 PM Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I use a custom script to manage local repos of cached rpms. > The script has been misbehaving since dnf5. At some point, I > thought the devs were reworking repoquery. Now, I can't find the > packages after running a dnf trans

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:25 PM Felix Miata wrote: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > > 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post-6.6 > kernels.

Adding tests for Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation/Fusion

Hey folks, I'd like to ask if we could consider adding regular tests for running Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation and VMware Fusion. Both products are now available for use at no-cost for any purpose[1]. Notably, VMware Fusion is the only reasonably supportable hypervisor for Fedora Linux VMs on

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce < test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > As many of you might know, Fedora WSL is coming to Fedora Linux 42[0]. > This will be a good starting point for many people and > blocking this artifact will help u

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 8:54 PM Scott Dowdle via test wrote: > > On Sunday, April 6th, 2025 at 3:20 PM, Andre Robatino > wrote: > > > OK, after watching the "Mount point assignment" video at > > https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-installer-redesign/ I have a better > > idea of what's going on.

Re: Heads up: replaced VNC with RDP in Basic release criteria

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 7:26 PM Sérgio Basto via test wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 12:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! I've gone ahead and updated the Basic release criteria to > > specify that installing via 'RDP' must work, instead of 'VNC': > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/