dora repo
stuff you have installed the worse it gets.
Did you get the 'personal email' that I sent to your post on the Xfce
list? That suggestion would fix your problem(s).
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
se),
> and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue.
>
> Is there an issue that should resolve later?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kevin
>
Try again. It works here.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
new file. That's not any better.
>
> At least .rpmnew flags for me that something happened I may want to look
> at. Only that passing extra options from a configuration file quite
> often does not need on an update neither .rpmnew nor .rpmsave.
>
>Michal
>
; but I'll include them here too:
>>>
>>> * Nightly and 'appliance' images can be found from the snazzy new
>>> Release Engineering dashboard:
>>> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/releng-dash/
>>>
>>> * The latest network install images
On 4/27/2014 11:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/28/14 11:08, Gavin Flower wrote:
>> What I said is based on
>
> Nothing to do with Fedora testing.which is what I believe poma is
> pointing out
>
>
Me too Ed.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@li
-1.fc21.i686
> 4/4
> Verifying : xulrunner-29.0-1.fc21.i686
> 1/4
> Verifying : firefox-29.0-5.fc21.i686
> 2/4
> Verifying : firefox-28.0-3.fc21.i686
On 6/6/2014 9:47 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I would add: A strong spam filtering system,
> easy to set up with reasonable documentation.
>
I am sure that they would appreciate and evaluate the code when you
provide it Chuck. I know that I would.
--
David
--
test mailing
Yum has a 'yum-utils' package that contains some useful CLI utilities.
Does DNF have such a package?
If yes what is it's name?
If not then why not?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 6/12/2014 1:46 AM, bitlord wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:31:48 -0400
> David wrote:
>
>> Yum has a 'yum-utils' package that contains some useful CLI utilities.
>> Does DNF have such a package?
>>
>> If yes what is it's name?
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/12/2014 10:46 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 06:58 -0400, David wrote:
>> IMO unless dnf supports these utilities internally or they are
>> provided by a second package dnf is missing a lot of very
>>
On 6/12/2014 12:28 PM, Shawn Starr wrote:
> On June 12, 2014 12:06:44 PM David wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/2014 10:46 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 06:58 -0400, David wrote:
>
>> >> IMO unless dnf supports these utilities internally or
rase it. Non-power users of Fedora normally would
>
> use yum-utils.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn
So you are saying that since "non-power users of Fedora" might not use
the kinda' not so "non-power users of Fedora" should not have these?
Where i come from that is normally called 'dumbing down the product'.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
do
> not yet have a dnf equivalent.
>
I *think* what Frank is saying is that *before* Fedora bails on YUM for
dnf there should be similar (better?) tools. That is unless dnf does not
crap out like YUM does from time to time. Or Fedup stops failing for
some users. My 2 cents.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 6/13/2014 5:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 17:13 -0400, David wrote:
>> On 6/13/2014 4:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 07:34 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>>>> If DNF is going to replace yum, it should have reasona
On 6/13/2014 6:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 18:20 -0400, David wrote:
>> On 6/13/2014 5:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 17:13 -0400, David wrote:
>>>> On 6/13/2014 4:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>>> On
cations. The same Fedora GUI configuration applications. The
only 'new things' that I had to get used to was a slightly
different looking terminal window, a slightly different looking file
manger, and a slightly different looking desktop. That took about 10
minutes.
--
David
--
tes
Hi Larry
All bug reports are appreciated, and Fedora has infrastructure to
receive them, but submitting them in the wrong place, as you are,
achieves nothing.
Please read
1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate#Providing_Feedback_to_Developers
2) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PostIsOffTopic#
On 27 February 2011 13:32, David wrote:
> Hi Larry
>
> All bug reports are appreciated, and Fedora has infrastructure to
> receive them, but submitting them in the wrong place, as you are,
> achieves nothing.
>
> Please read
> 1) http://fedoraproj
x27;goes gold', the updates will configure everything for you.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
odule a couple of times but it's always the same error.
>
> I don't know enough about that to even try fixing it myself.
>
>
You should read the whole thread.
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=28088
--
David
--
test mailing list
te
e
GuestAdition software. And the video drivers won't build because Fedora
16, and Rawhide, use an as yet to be unsupoorted version of Xorg.
VirtualBox does not chase Alpha or Beta software.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedora
o kill system-config-display
and make monitor recognition and resolution into 'plug-n-pray'.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/4/2011 10:51 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:03 -0400, David wrote:
>
>> The 'advanced graphics' video feature in Virtualbox seldom works in
>> Rawhide and the current 'branched' package (currently Fedora 16) because
>> Virtua
On 10/4/2011 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 20:04 -0400, David wrote:
>> On 10/4/2011 10:51 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:03 -0400, David wrote:
>>>
>>>> The 'advanced graphics' video feature i
boot drive is and it
> worked first time. I'v just copied over some of the old kernel
> parameters like vga=0x305 and nouveau.modeset=0 and
> rdblacklist=nouveau. your's might not have them don't know, but it
> boots ok
To what line did you add 'vga=0x
On 10/16/2011 4:21 PM, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
>>
>> To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
>>
>> - --
>>
>> David
>
> I don't actually know the correct/official way to do this, but
> here
On 10/17/2011 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:21 +0100, Martin Airs wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
>>>
>>> To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
>>>
>>> - --
>>>
>>> D
My question is. Since Fedora 16 RC5 was declared good does that mean
that the ISO that will be released Nov 8 be a renamed RC5? Are they/will
they be the same ISO?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
gt;> that the ISO that will be released Nov 8 be a renamed RC5? Are they/will
>> they be the same ISO?
>> --
>>
>> David
>
> Basically, yes. There will be some renaming and suchlike, but yes. It
> will be the same
> binarys.
Thank you.
--
D
eem to be totally reproducible as it happens randomly.
> I am running Fedora 16 with Gnome3.
> --
> 'Taxes are what we pay for civilized society" --- Oliver Wendell Holmes
>
>
First suggestion. Turn *off* the html.
Second suggestion. Report your question again
h. I
>> usually use the netinst image and I'll try that now.
>
> Live media does not have rescue mode. ;)
>
> You need a install dvd or netinstall iso.
The Fedora-17 Xfce x86_64 does.
- - --
David
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
Com
a reason for a rolling release.
>>
>> I quite enjoy Fedora 14.
>
> Please, if you do nothing else, upgrade your kernel manually.
>
> josh
>
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
e. 'I use Linux so I'm ten feet tall and bullet proof'.
> -Original Message-
> From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:10 AM
> To: test@lists.fedora
te the
> vbox kernel modules. I have to run manually "/etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup".
>
> Any hint?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Joachim Backes
>
> http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
It was reported as broken and was reported fixed. It has not worked for
a long, long t
ow
> bloated mess, and chrome is becoming popular because it isn't
> a slow bloated mess (yet :-).
The major of the 'Firefox is slow' problems are caused by misbehaving
themes and extensions and the the 'remnants' that some of them leave in
the configuration fi
ives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 ->
> /usr/java/jre1.6.0_26/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so
>
> ls -l /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 May 8 11:16 libjavaplugin.so ->
> /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
The latest Java 6 is u32. The Latest Java 7 us u4
--
On 5/9/2012 1:41 PM, Akshay Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:08 PM, David wrote:
>> On 5/8/2012 11:37 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>>
>>> For some reason in firefox the java plugin refuses to install. In
>>> order to do my job I have to use jre and not I
uld work.
>> Overnight the local net died and I decided to revert to the
>> previously installed F16.
>
> So...you're saying that F17 behaves exactly the same as F16 except
> something went wrong.
>
> This is very useful information and I shall work on fixing someth
came from here:
"Systemd"
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd>
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
st 'I don't have that' comment.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 7/8/2012 9:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 07/08/2012 04:56 PM, David wrote:
On 7/8/2012 4:37 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 07/08/2012 10:12 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:54:50 -0700,
Steven I Usdansky wrote:
After upgrading my
On 7/8/2012 10:01 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 07/08/2012 06:54 PM, David wrote:
On 7/8/2012 9:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 07/08/2012 04:56 PM, David wrote:
On 7/8/2012 4:37 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 07/08/2012 10:12 AM, Bruno Wolff III
On 7/9/2012 11:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/2012 11:43 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 07:49 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Agreed. And I fear the universe, in this case, may be winning by
producing "bigger idiot" developers.
Indeed -- "bigger idiot&
On 7/9/2012 12:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/10/2012 12:19 AM, David wrote:
Anytime I hear this or something similar - "coming from the Windows
world and not aware they have a choice in the DeskTop" - I wonder just
who would wipe out a working OS on a computer and install '
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781482>
Perhaps some action.
Everyone with this zombie process please sign on to Bugzilla and vote
for this.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 8/17/2012 6:31 PM, David wrote:
> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781482>
>
> Perhaps some action.
>
> Everyone with this zombie process please sign on to Bugzilla and vote
> for this.
>
Sorry my bad. Sent to wrong mailing list. I have had sever
--fastestmirror --skip-broken'. It
takes a while but has worked every time. So far. :-)
First thing that would / could be a game stopper would be for those that
have third party packages installed. I would think that those cause many
of the 'my update failed' problems.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
gt;
Does OpenSUSE have mailing lists? Or forums? Perhaps this is a better
question for there. I would think that perhaps they might be more
interested in listening to you run down Fedora than the people here.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https:
rning: environment Cinnamon Desktop does not exist.
> No packages in any requested group available to install or update
>
> Anybody sees this too, or has an explanation?
>
> Kernel: 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc19.x86_64
> yum: yum-3.4.3-81.fc19.noarch
>
> Kind
rning: environment Cinnamon Desktop does not exist.
> No packages in any requested group available to install or update
>
> Anybody sees this too, or has an explanation?
>
> Kernel: 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc19.x86_64
> yum: yum-3.4.3-81.fc19.noarch
>
> Kind regards
>
On 4/6/2013 11:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/13 22:47, David wrote:
>> yum groupinstall "Cinnamon Desktop" use "" non ``
>
> FYI, either way works fine for me
>
Really?
For me the `` (the 'tic marks') fail, and always have fail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/6/2013 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 04/06/2013 04:23 PM, David wrote:
>> On 4/6/2013 4:35 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> yum grouplist shows the Cinnamon Desktop as installable group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/6/2013 2:45 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 04/06/2013 08:23 PM, David wrote:
>> On 4/6/2013 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2013 04:23 PM, David wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2013 4:35 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
oup names' are on the CD's and the
DVD's, installed by default, but the packages are not on the disk(s).
When you try to install "Cinnamon Desktop" do you have an Internet
connection with the proper repos configured?
I use Xfce and that is the way it works for me.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 4/6/2013 5:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/13 23:48, David wrote:
>> On 4/6/2013 11:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 04/06/13 22:47, David wrote:
>>>> yum groupinstall "Cinnamon Desktop" use "" non ``
>>> FYI, either way works fine
On 4/6/2013 8:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/07/13 02:54, David wrote:
>> On 4/6/2013 2:45 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>
>>> What's the difference from the shell's aspect?
>>
>>
>> I have no idea. Unl
On 4/6/2013 8:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/07/13 02:54, David wrote:
>> On 4/6/2013 2:45 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>
>>> What's the difference from the shell's aspect?
>>
>>
>> I have no idea. Unl
On 4/7/2013 12:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/07/13 10:38, David wrote:
>> Don't ya' love Linux and the 'works for me' stage? :-)
>>
>> Before I made the comment to Joachim I tried this again. The single
>> quotes, What has failed for me in the
t;
>>
>> Additionally:
>>
>> sudo yum group install "Cinnamon Desktop"
>> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
>> Warning: environment Cinnamon Desktop does not exist.
>> No packages in any requested group available to install or update
&g
On 4/9/2013 10:39 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:18:30AM -0400, David wrote:
>> I read this as sudo yum group install "Cinnamon Desktop"
>>
>> should besudo yum groupinstall "Cinnamon Desktop"
>>
>> since the
?
>
I see it here in both the 1386 as well as the x86_64 repos. Maybe your
mirro is out of date or incomplete?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 4/10/2013 10:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/11/13 10:48, David wrote:
>> On 4/10/2013 9:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Trying to do an install of KDE after installing GNOME with the DVD. It
>>> can't complete since ebook-tools-libs seems to be missing from
On 4/26/2013 5:07 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I finally got Fedora into a 800 MHz 1.5 GB Pentium III using
> 721M Apr 24 14:20 Fedora-Live-XFCE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso.
Why?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
releases of
software. The Xorg that is in Rawhide often fails with Vitrualbox for
that reason. The Xorg in Fedora 14 (to be) might also fit that category.
This is an experence 'guess' on my part based only on past experience
with Virtualbox and Fedora development software.
. Its too bad. Older
> versions
> of Fedora run fine under these old VMs.
>
> I guess I'll just have to wait and test F14 under physical hardware...
> and then hope KDE4.5 is good enough (compared to MY needs inKDE 3.5)
> to make the switch.
Virtualbox has never supported alpha or beta software. Xorg and kernels
in Fedora, and other, development packages sometimes do not 'work'.
F-14, and Rawhide, have an unsupported version of Xorg.
BTW VMware usually has similar situations.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
miss something? Would anyone know why Firefox is so far out of date?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 8/31/2010 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 21:03 +0200, martin tack wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2010/8/31 David
>> The current Firefox 4.0 is beta 4 with beta 5 scheduled for
>> release
>> (Tentative) Sept
about it.
>
> Are people other than me encountering a lot of issues with F14? Feel
> free to ignore this question if the list has already gone through this
> in my absence. ;-)
Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again
and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these
problems will be all be worked out by others that actually do the
testing and everything will be to your liking.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote:
>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again
>> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these
>> problems will be all be worked out by ot
On 9/12/2010 12:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 23:27:41 -0400,
> David wrote:
>>
>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again
>> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these
>> problem
On 9/12/2010 12:34 AM, Phil Savoie wrote:
> On 12/09/10 12:09 AM, David wrote:
>> On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>>> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote:
>>>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again
>>>> and th
On 9/12/2010 12:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 00:46:49 -0400,
> David wrote:
>>
>> His comment about the number of my bug reports only indicates that I
>> have few problems and most of them are common and reported by others
>> before
ent.
I can't say for qemu-kvm or vmware-player but the reason that Virtualbox
does not 'like' Fedora 14, or Rawhide, is the version of Xorg they use.
Virtualbox does not, never has, supported non-release (official)
versions of software.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
s before the Canada Day July 1 weekend, a
> day or so after I mentioned it. I am currently up in the kernel
> running before the Fedora 19 updates-testing report of 2 July 2013;
> 18:45 PDT. PDT is probably UTC -7:00
>
Fedora 19, the gold, was released July 2.
--
David
--
not so necessary for those of us who are familiar with
> Linux, especially if we boot into the text environment. I'm just
> thinking of other users that we may attract from other OSes.
>
> my 2 cents.
>
> Richard
>
Funny. Others have been bit*hing about the list fo
completed, but now I see yum search apparently has no
> option to learn the available searched package version(s), which makes
> the search pointless. :-(
does yum check-updategive you the information you are seeking?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
In Rawhide with Xfce as the desktop the icons in the greater have been
missing, for me, for several weeks. Would anyone happen to know what
package provides them?
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 8/18/2013 6:39 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> David wrote:
>
>> In Rawhide with Xfce as the desktop the icons in the greater have been
>> missing, for me, for several weeks. Would anyone happen to know what
>> package provides them?
>
> I've heard grumblings about
On 8/18/2013 9:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> David wrote:
>>
>>> In Rawhide with Xfce as the desktop the icons in the greater have been
>>> missing, for me, for several weeks. Would anyone happen to know what
>>> package provides
On 8/18/2013 9:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> David wrote:
>>
>>> In Rawhide with Xfce as the desktop the icons in the greater have been
>>> missing, for me, for several weeks. Would anyone happen to know what
>>> package provides
valid procedure?"
Hmm..
Sounds like a eclectic procedure and situation to me.
--
David
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
>> On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
>>> These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
>>>
On 9/25/2013 9:33 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote:
>> On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
>>>> On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>>>> Several of my machi
keep this install going on the f33 path.Right ?
Chears.
David Locklear
Arcola, Texas USA
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
happens every version, on Day#1. Meaning, I
think that on Day # 1 of the switch to F33, that less packages should be
installed - maybe just the kernel. Or at least include notes as to what a
user updating to F33 should do.
David Locklear
Rawhide novice
Arcola, Texas USA
Sometime in the past two weeks, the Rawhide updates apparently removed all
fc31 packages.
Does that sound right ? Or was it just my imagination ?
David Locklear
Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.1
Arcola, Texas USA
[ Intel i5-3470 desktop, with Rawhide Xfce as my only operating system on
an SSD
watching YouTuve videos while looking for ways to learn
new things.
I can should have a better computer by June, and hopefully one with a
graphics card. I have never used a graphics card.
I hope to never own another motherboard with Broadcom wi-fi.
David Locklear
__
nstall now has about seventy fc33 packages. And lots of
the
anaconda packages seemed to clear out.
Everything installed !!
I am too scared to reboot.But probably will anyways.
I am curious now whether my system will say I am on Fedora 33, if
it reboots successfully ??
David Lockl
I have not rebooted yet, but if I type "inxi -F" it displays I am in Fedora
33.
I lost third-party repository along the way.
Rebooting now.
>
> David Locklear
> Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.2
> Arcola, Texas USA
>
___
I am in Fedora 33 on hardware as my only operating system !!
It is butter-smooth and fast and everything works.
This is so thrilling.
David Locklear
Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.3
Arcola, Texas USA
___
test mailing list -- test
Rawhide on hardware with more stability than other DEs.
That all being said, I hope to stay on Fedora 33 Xfce for at least a few
weeks, as my only operating system.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
rvice ( AT&T ),
so my efforts to update things and tinker with my computer, are often
extremely frustrating.
David Locklear
Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.4
Arcola, Texas, USA
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
s not show you
in the menu what version it is, nor a description of the software.For
example, the pdf viewer ( which I think I installed via flatpak ?? )
I would post more, but I really do not know much, and my d***n internet
keeps crashing.
David Locklear
Arcola,
know the pros and cons of
dropping it. I think I would like to "someday" be in a
desktop-environment free of X11, ( if that is ever feasible ), but since
Xfce will not be using wayland anytime soon, I will likely try Plasma, next.
David Locklear
__
Rawhide users in the world are there ?
I would
be surprised if the number was over 100, and I doubt most of those use it
as there
only operating system.
Cheers,
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
I am just curious,
what wi-fi specs / gadgets work best in Fedora 32 or 33?
I have crappy Broadcom on the motherboard,
but I have a USB dongle by ( TP-Link N300, I think )
Both are automatically recognized, but neither connect.
David Locklear
ng my computer.My modem now works.
Is that
just a coincidence ?Or is there a ghost just messing with me ? Or
does AT&T in
Houston, Texas area really suck as bad as I think it does.
David Locklear
P.S. On a sad note, my estranged-wife threw a psychotic fit today,
because she
switch or a lever ? Does he or she have a golden key ? Is there a
separate
repo for Fedora 32 and Fedora 33 ?Please try to explain in simple
manner.
Thank you all.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
I can only guess that I have about 30 man-hours of usage since my Rawhide
install
became "fc33."I have no idea how to properly word that statement.
Better to say,
"since Rawhide branched off Fedora 32."Right ?
David Locklear
___
, yet have zero computer interest.
Eventually, she will catch
on that her iPad is just a giant smartphone.
My point is, that I would have rather purchased a tablet with Fedora
Workstation on it.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedor
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo