Both sides of this conversation feel very passionately obviously. And there
is nothing wrong with that at all its just dissapointing to me to see it
become a personal attack instead of a healthy debate on why or why not
certain pieces should be included. I agree having numerous DEs available is
nic
Adam,
All of these look good to me
On Aug 28, 2012 3:52 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On 2012-08-21 18:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed
>> the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare
>> metal booting o
It makes a lot of sense and I think this is a need delinataion
On Aug 28, 2012 5:34 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> I like it, makes sense. +1.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
--
test maili
I think if its laid out in a logical format like name, version, stage it
would be fine
On Aug 29, 2012 9:00 AM, "Kamil Paral" wrote:
> > and add a new Alpha criterion:
> >
> > * Any component which prominently identifies a Fedora release version
> > number or phase (Alpha, Beta, Final) must do so
