On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:24 PM stan via kernel
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 06:38:08 -0700
> stan via kernel wrote:
>
> > I have an install of rawhide. It is updated to latest packages in
> > rawhide. One of those packages is the new 5.14 kernel. It mostly
> > works, but I have seen three fr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210711.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 40
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.72 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:11:42 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> You might ask in #fedora-kernel but my two cents is I generally don't
> file bugs on rawhide kernels in the RHBZ. Instead I try to figure out
> what part of the kernels is blowing up, and use a current version of
> the MAINTAINERS file [1]
Hello!
Will attend today too and has started running Kernel 5.13 tests
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:56 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-07-12
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting o
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210711.0):
ID: 926000 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/926000
ID: 926016 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-i
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 65/138 (aarch64), 105/199 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not faile
://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0&groupid=1
(adamw, 15:17:22)
* Rawhide was working fine until the middle of last week, recent
composes have big problems, most images fail to boot and Cloud
images fa
