I noticed that all rawhide kernels are built with debugging mode and may produce
issues (slow-down or freeze) .
Only rc releases seems to be nodebug.
I'm using kernel 5.13 fc35 release , downloaded in koji repo ,and waiting for
5.14 rc1 for update, probably in kernel-nodebug repo.
Hoping to h
On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:28:48 -
"edmond pilon" wrote:
> I noticed that all rawhide kernels are built with debugging mode and
> may produce issues (slow-down or freeze) .
> Only rc releases seems to be nodebug.
Thanks for your help. It would make sense. There is a greater chance
of race con
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210710.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210711.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 106
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 125.14 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 05:45:54 -
"edmond pilon" wrote:
> Rawhide kernels are generaly built in debugging mode, so you m
> See : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelDebugStrategy
>
> I'm using rawhide too but with kernel nodebug mode
> See
> :https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kerne
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210710.0):
ID: 925134 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925134
ID: 925144 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210710.0):
ID: 925166 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925166
ID: 925182 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-i
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 66/138 (aarch64), 107/199 (x86_64)
New failures (sa
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 19:24 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 06:38:08 -0700
> stan via kernel wrote:
>
> > I have an install of rawhide. It is updated to latest packages in
> > rawhide. One of those packages is the new 5.14 kernel. It mostly
> > works, but I have seen three fre
On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 06:22:51 -0700
stan via test wrote:
> I normally run custom compiled rawhide kernels tuned to my hardware.
> In those I turn debugging off. I haven't been able to build one for
> 5.14 yet because of a problem in the build process. I will try again
> with the 20210709 kernel
I am running rawhide. When I do a dnf update, it goes at normal speed,
but the verify step takes a long time. I had an update of 789 MB, and
it took ~ 30 minutes to verify. A 123 MB kernel install took between
10 and 15 minutes to verify. During these verify proceedings, dnf is
writing constant
10 matches
Mail list logo
