No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
Hi,
Thanks for starting the discussion, Ankur! I was just about to send a
request for testing to the test list.
I just pushed gnome-software 3.28.0 to F27 updates-testing that
implements Fedora Workstation Third Party Repositories as approved in
https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/121
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 207283 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/207283
ID: 207312 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
U
On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 12:32 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 12:09 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Back after a period away.
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 09:39 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > […]
> > >
> > > This still leaves a question how you are going to mo
OLD: Fedora-28-20180318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hola!
Monday 2018-03-26 will be Fedora 28 Gnome 3.28 Test Day!
As part of this planned Change for Fedora 28[0], So this is an important Test
Day!
As we approach the Beta, we try to make sure that all the gnome features
are performing as they should.
We need to ensure it's working well enough a
Greetings!
There has been a lively debate about the usefulness of Bodhi's batching feature
on a FESCo ticket[0].
There have been some suggestions that it might be useful or interesting to QA
to test the set of batched updates as a set, but we thought it would be good to
formally ask QA to comm
Hi,
I've been running into a problem when I want to test an update. This
happens to quite often. Today I happened to try the new Firefox update.
The ways I've tried installing updates for testing are as follows:
dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing install (package name)
dnf --enablerepo=
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 14:44 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running into a problem when I want to test an update. This
> happens to quite often. Today I happened to try the new Firefox update.
>
> The ways I've tried installing updates for testing are as follows:
>
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 207446 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/207446
ID: 207482 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fed
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 10:47:37 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
>
> Thanks for starting the discussion, Ankur! I was just about to send a
> request for testing to the test list.
Ah - sorry. I was slightly overzealous here XD
>
> More replies in-line down below:
>
> On 03/18/2018 01:28
Hey folks! Just a note that there are some more F28 Beta blocker-fixing
updates that could use some testing and feedback:
1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2c066076a2
This is an anaconda update that fixes a bug in recent versions: if you
did a live install and both created a
13 matches
Mail list logo
