Adam Williamson wrote:
> So I wouldn't assume that any of the discussion is at
> all relevant until you've at least established that someone
made a
> conscious decision to make some part of KDE not respect
those files any
> more. It's just as likely, or more likely, to be a
straightforward
> mi
I just discovered something odd that explains why umask isn't
getting set for the user (me).
Traditionally (I researched countless sites about the proper
place for things and, as I said, it has always worked in the
past, right up until F26), umask is supposed to be in
bash_profile.
However, I
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 70/116 (x86_64), 21/23 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170425.n.0):
ID: 90134 Test: x86
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 24/116 (x86_64), 12/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 90236 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedorap
Hi once again!
Out of my last trials with fc27 (after many desperate days of no-go
today having been successful on getting a working system installed by
stepping from Workstation-Live over live installation to setting up xfce
afterwords) I think there's still a long list of things to do. So fo
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
133 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
126 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
89 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
