> This is on Fedora 21.
>
> The gist is that /var gets mounted later than the check for
> /var/.updated used to trigger offline updates. Therefore if you have a
> separate /var volume, rather than a directory, you're not getting
> updates, and this is a silent fail.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
> > Questions:
> > a.) Is the silent fail for offline updates itself a bug or need to be
> > a feature request?
>
> I think the user should be informed about the results of an update, both
> successful and unsuccessful. (For successful updates I do see a notification
> on the next boot.)
>
> If y
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:09:27 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Another day, another rev of rawhide that won't come up in X.
>
> I am amazed how much Linux administration now depends on X.
>
I think I recall that gnome-session was the problem. Downgrading same
should help.
--
test mailing
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 03:01 -0500, Lili Nie wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> I'm intending to modify some test cases in the Fedora test wiki
> pages,as shown in the following:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Partitioning_No_Swap
> How to test
> Boot the installer using any ava
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 04:12 +0300, Natan Mai wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Then, this e-mail describes my self-introduction in this list. My
> name's Natan J. Mai and I am from Chapecó, Brazil. I am 20 years
> old and study Computer Science in a Federal University here.
>
> I use Linux since two years o
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > Questions:
>> > a.) Is the silent fail for offline updates itself a bug or need to be
>> > a feature request?
>>
>> I think the user should be informed about the results of an update, both
>> successful and unsuccessful. (For successful upda
On 01/14/2015 08:29 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:09:27 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Another day, another rev of rawhide that won't come up in X.
I am amazed how much Linux administration now depends on X.
I think I recall that gnome-session was the problem. Downg
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:06 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 08:29 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:09:27 -0800
> > Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> >
> > > Another day, another rev of rawhide that won't come up in X.
> > >
> > > I am amazed how much Linux a
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15342/rubygem-actionpack-4.1.5-2.fc21
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15413/rubygem-sprockets-2.12.1-3.fc21
33
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
103
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
On 01/14/2015 03:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:06 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 01/14/2015 08:29 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:09:27 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Another day, another rev of rawhide that won't come up in X.
I am am
F22 boot.iso dd'd to USB stick, after boot the internal mSATA drive is
not visible (no lsblk, blkid, parted, not in dmesg either).
F21 installed to that mSATA drive, with the identical 3.19 kernel
version as is on that rawhide boot.iso, boots fine and of course it
sees the mSATA drive or boot woul
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
When I grab this boot.iso and boot it, the mouse/trackpad doesn't
work. There is an arrow but it doesn't move. And the touch screen
doesn't work either. With live media, it does work. So I'm not sure
what's going o
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
>
> When I grab this boot.iso
Liar! I use this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20150110_Installation
Chris Murphy
--
test
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
>
>
> When I grab this boot.iso and boot it, the mouse/trackpad doesn't
> work. There is an arrow but it doesn't move. And the touch screen
> doesn't work
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:48:28 AM
> Subject: Re: update some test cases
>
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 03:01 -0500, Lili Nie wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> > I'm inte
http://haldorsson.com/ivzidiu/epwlmsqhrqsnh.vodrppcmifauwxybaoragwwpyustadpltwfr
redwolfe
1/15/2015 6:22:12 AM--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
>>
>>
>> When I grab this boot.iso and boot it, the mouse/trackpad doesn't
>> work. There is an ar
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This works, trackpad is fine:
> Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-rawhide-20150110.iso
In case a KDE reader is reading this, there are many UI anomalies with
anaconda on KDE. Blocky text, lengthy delays with UI responsiveness
when clicking, some erra
19 matches
Mail list logo
