> On 02/08/2012 06:43 PM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
>
> >
> > We are currently obtaining the administrator rights for the Trac
> > (so we can
> > update the home page) as well as downstream Fedora access. Of
> > course, we'd like
> > to put 0.8.0 into Fedora repos by the time it's released (hopefull
#279: Proventester Mentor Request
--+-
Reporter: bitznbitez | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mento
#279: Proventester Mentor Request
--+--
Reporter: bitznbitez | Owner: mcloaked
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Pro
Part of the F17 repo is present now, but it looks like it is using the older
all in one format rather than a directory for each leading character in
file names. Is that the way it's supposed to be?
I want to make a local mirror, but I want to make sure what the directory
format is going to be firs
> > Kamil Paral redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > > Several tests in the install test matrix require the above
> > > > option,
> > > > but when
> > > > anaconda attempts to start after downloading the file, I get
> > > > the
> > > > text-based
> > > > traceback (not the expected GUI error) at
> > > >
# F17 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2012-02-10
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The third F17 alpha blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at
17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be running through the final
blocker
#264: Request for F17 Power Management test day
---+---
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:|
> "BW" == Bruno Wolff writes:
BW> Part of the F17 repo is present now, but it looks like it is using
BW> the older all in one format rather than a directory for each leading
BW> character in file names. Is that the way it's supposed to be?
Confirmed on #fedora-admin that this was a mistake a
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:59:55 -0500,
Josh Boyer wrote:
> I fixed that yesterday.
>
> I don't think the convertfs script really needs to deal with that, but if
> Harald wants to do that then go for it.
Now that I understand why the problem occured, I agree the conversion
script doesn't need
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:44:48 -0600,
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BW" == Bruno Wolff writes:
>
> BW> Part of the F17 repo is present now, but it looks like it is using
> BW> the older all in one format rather than a directory for each leading
> BW> character in file names. Is that t
>
> From: Andre Robatino
>To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:40 PM
>Subject: f 17 netinst.iso in virtualbox 4.1.8
>
>Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Should be fixed by:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildi
**IMPORTANT**: There were different versions of the TC2 install and live
images which were overwritten prior to this announcement. I also briefly
posted delta ISOs for some of these old images. Please make sure that
the images you are using correspond to the currently posted checksum files.
As per
12 matches
Mail list logo
