Compose started at Sat Jan 22 08:15:21 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:03 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Should they be visible?
GNOME 3 will not start nautilus by default.
Sorry, I should have probably announced this change hitting rawhide.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
W dniu 19 stycznia 2011 18:44 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
>
> I doubt that this problem is related to kernel space issue. I'll try
> to track down it this week.
Something strange is happening here. I'm running yum upgrade, amarok,
firefox and after a while pulse audio goes mad.
iotop s
Hi,
I upgraded to latest and greatest rawhide and my gnome terminal shows
blank screen.
I guess it is not a new Gnome 3 feature :)
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
2011/1/22 Matthias Clasen
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:03 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Should they be visible?
>
> GNOME 3 will not start nautilus by default.
> Sorry, I should have probably announced this change hitting rawhide.
>
oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 16:40 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded to latest and greatest rawhide and my gnome terminal shows
> blank screen.
>
> I guess it is not a new Gnome 3 feature :)
Its a theme problem.
As a workaround, you can uncheck 'use theme colors' in the profile
pref
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
Yes, it starts gnome-shell, unless your system is not capable of running
it, in which case it starts gnome-panel+metacity.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
RWMJ> I thought that was all I had to do, but apparently there's
RWMJ> something else needed to drop it entirely.
Did you delete all of the files and add a dead.package file?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
- J<
--
On 01/22/2011 10:10 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:03 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> Should they be visible?
>
> GNOME 3 will not start nautilus by default.
> Sorry, I should have probably announced this change hitting rawhide.
>
The startup applications menu selection has
2011/1/22 Michał Piotrowski
> W dniu 19 stycznia 2011 18:44 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
> >
> > I doubt that this problem is related to kernel space issue. I'll try
> > to track down it this week.
>
> Something strange is happening here. I'm running yum upgrade, amarok,
> firefox and
W dniu 22 stycznia 2011 17:42 użytkownik cornel panceac
napisał:
>
>
> 2011/1/22 Michał Piotrowski
>>
>> W dniu 19 stycznia 2011 18:44 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>> >
>> > I doubt that this problem is related to kernel space issue. I'll try
>> > to track down it this week.
>>
>> So
2011/1/22 Matthias Clasen :
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 16:40 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I upgraded to latest and greatest rawhide and my gnome terminal shows
>> blank screen.
>>
>> I guess it is not a new Gnome 3 feature :)
>
> Its a theme problem.
> As a workaround, you can uncheck
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 09:58, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> The startup applications menu selection has gone away also...so how do
> we start nautilus when gnome is loaded? Used to be able to put a
> startup cmd in the startup apps dialogue.
>
http://specifications.freedesktop.org/autostart-spec/au
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:10:32 -0500,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:03 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Should they be visible?
>
> GNOME 3 will not start nautilus by default.
> Sorry, I should have probably announced this change hitting rawhide.
What about people who w
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> >
> > oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
>
> Yes, it starts gnome-shell, unless your system is not capable of running
> it, in which case it s
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> >
> > oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
>
> Yes, it starts gnome-shell, unless your system is not capable of running
> it, in which case it s
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
> >
> > Yes, it starts gnome-sh
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
>> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > oh, but should it start panel
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 19:16:59 +,
Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Please don't. There's a lot of devices that can't run gnome-shell but
> can run the gnome 2 configuration perfectly. With dependencies like
> that on devices with small amounts of space you end up with a lot of
> extra stuff you
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
>>> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>> > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel p
I am not sure when this started, but I noticed that plugging and unplugging
USB devices no longer seems to be triggering actions. Stuff that was plugged
in at boot is detected, but lsusb still lists devices after they have been
unplugged and new devices don't get created when I plug a new device in
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 13:40:11 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am not sure when this started, but I noticed that plugging and unplugging
> USB devices no longer seems to be triggering actions. Stuff that was plugged
> in at boot is detected, but lsusb still lists devices after they have been
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 19:16:59 +,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Please don't. There's a lot of devices that can't run gnome-shell but
>> can run the gnome 2 configuration perfectly. With dependencies like
>> that on devices with sma
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:45 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
Matthias Clasen w
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/socat-1.7.1.3-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0-12.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_a
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 14:32, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Well you'd want to be able to exclude it as well and adding it as an
> artificial dep to something like gnome-session won't allow it to be
> removed.
>
GNOME Shell is the shell of GNOME 3 and thus depending on the GNOME Shell
from the gnome-
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:37:17 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I see.
>
> Is this not FAS problem as in the required page should pop up to the
> applicant for reading before he can proceed to apply or the group
> admin aint doing his due diligence and regularly check the account
> for new
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 14:32, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Well you'd want to be able to exclude it as well and adding it as an
>> artificial dep to something like gnome-session won't allow it to be
>> removed.
>
> GNOME Shell is the shel
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 14:32, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> Well you'd want to be able to exclude it as well and adding it as an
>>> artificial dep to something like gnome-se
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?
You have the freedom to modify the packages to remove any dependencies
you want to. You don't have the freedom to insist that packagers support
that use case.
--
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?
>
> You have the freedom to modify the packages to remove any dependencies
> you want to. You don't have
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?
>>
>> You have the freedom to modify the pa
On 1/22/2011 6:05 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?
>>
>> You have the freedom to modify the packages to rem
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 23:05 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?
> >
> > You have the freedom to modify t
>
> > So what are all the people that don't have video cards suppose to do
> > that don't support 3D. Use KDE? I thought gnome was continuing to
> > support that use case?
>
> Yes, thats the much-talked about fallback. Supporting that does not mean
> that we have to support only installing the half
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:35 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:36 +-0100, Jan Vongrej wrote:
> +AD4 Hi,
> +AD4
> +AD4 I would like to patricipate and as i looked currently the best way to
> do is to try to join Bug Zappers Team.
> +AD4 I have experience like system administrator,
37 matches
Mail list logo
