Re: Proposed directions for proven testers

2010-06-23 Thread Kamil Paral
- "Aaron Faanes" wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester > > Pushed. :) > I just read it all and I like it very much. Easily readable and understandable. Good job. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Richard Hughes
On 22 June 2010 21:00, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > Richard answered this, but shouldn't gnome-icon-theme-symbolic have been > pulled in by whatever package that needs it? I suppose it should be in comps, or maybe as a require to something generic like gnome-desktop3. Richard. -- test mailing list t

Re: [Fedora QA] #76: Use two methods to specify install source

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#76: Use two methods to specify install source --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Kjartan Maraas
ti., 22.06.2010 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I updated from F13 to rawhide today and everything went smooth when I > > skipped packages with broken deps. Ended up with some 1500 packages > > being updated :-) > >

Re: Proposed directions for proven testers

2010-06-23 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 04:18 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > - "Aaron Faanes" wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester > > > > Pushed. :) > > > > I just read it all and I like it very much. Easily readable > and understandable. Good job. +1 very clear instructions! Thanks f

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 06/23/2010 11:15 AM, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > ti., 22.06.2010 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > >> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I updated from F13 to rawhide today and everything went smooth when I >>> skipped packages with broken d

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Kjartan Maraas
on., 23.06.2010 kl. 12.40 +, skrev "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > On 06/23/2010 11:15 AM, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > ti., 22.06.2010 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > > > >> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I updated from F13 to ra

Re: [Fedora QA] #76: Use two methods to specify install source

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#76: Use two methods to specify install source --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Fedora 11 updates-testing report

2010-06-23 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 11 updates-testing gcin-1.5.1-1.fc11 Details about builds: gcin-1.5.1-1.fc11 (FEDORA-2010-10303) Input method for Traditional Chinese --

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-06-23 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing avarice-2.10-3.fc12 bibletime-2.7-1.fc12 eclipse-cdt-6.0.2-1.fc12 gcin-1.5.1-1.fc12 gnome-applet-netspeed-0.16-1.fc12 josm-0-0.7.3329svn.fc12 josm-0-0.8.3329svn.fc12 perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.39-1.fc12

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-06-23 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing ReviewBoard-1.0.8-5.fc13 avarice-2.10-4.fc13 bibletime-2.7-1.fc13 blender-2.49b-9.fc13 cups-1.4.4-3.fc13 foomatic-4.0.4-12.fc13 gambas-1.0.19-13.fc13 gcin-1.5.1-1.fc13 gettext-0.18.1.1-1.1.fc13

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 13:15 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > ti., 22.06.2010 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > I updated from F13 to rawhide today and everything went smooth when I > > > skipped packages with br

[Fedora QA] #79: Add firstboot release criteria

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#79: Add firstboot release criteria ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #80: Add dual-boot release criteria

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#80: Add dual-boot release criteria ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Re: [Fedora QA] #80: Add dual-boot release criteria

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#80: Add dual-boot release criteria --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #81: Add i18n release criteria

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#81: Add i18n release criteria ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki |

[Fedora QA] #82: Update existing dual-boot tests and add to test plan

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#82: Update existing dual-boot tests and add to test plan ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Compo

[Fedora QA] #83: Clarify installer test coverage with i18n team

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#83: Clarify installer test coverage with i18n team ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

[Fedora QA] #84: Define install matrix baseline

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#84: Define install matrix baseline ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #85: Clarify wiki test priority

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#85: Clarify wiki test priority ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki |

[Fedora QA] #86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: adamwill Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

[Fedora QA] #88: Add test coverage for 'basic video driver install'

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#88: Add test coverage for 'basic video driver install' ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Compone

[Fedora QA] #89: Improve tracking blocker review status

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#89: Improve tracking blocker review status ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #90: Make blocker bug nag mails part of the SOP

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#90: Make blocker bug nag mails part of the SOP ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wik

Re: [Fedora QA] #81: Add i18n release criteria

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#81: Add i18n release criteria --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

[Fedora QA] #91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Tom Lane
If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing. regards, tom lane -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Fedora QA] #92: Define proventester process

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#92: Define proventester process ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki |

[Fedora QA] #93: Review options to reward key QA contributors

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#93: Review options to reward key QA contributors ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: jlaska Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: W

Re: [Fedora QA] #87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: adamwill Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 C

Re: [Fedora QA] #87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#87: Expand desktop release criteria and validation --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: adamwill Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 C

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing. Well, because this is the mailing list of the QA team, and we use the trac tickets to organize our work. It's not very hard to filter them out if you don't want them. -- Adam

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing. Thanks for your concerns and suggestions for improvement. :) The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending ticket notifications to this list since January. The volume is typic

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 13:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing. > > Well, because this is the mailing list of the QA team, and we use the > trac tickets to organize our work. >

Fedora 14 QA recommendations

2010-06-23 Thread James Laska
Greetings folks, Just a quick heads up ... as you probably noticed (if you haven't unsubscribed), I just filed a batch of tickets for tracking Fedora 14 QA recommendations [1]. There are a few additional items left to note, but I'm still figuring out whether to track those in other ticket queues.

Re: Rawhide - first experience

2010-06-23 Thread Kjartan Maraas
on., 23.06.2010 kl. 11.07 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 13:15 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > ti., 22.06.2010 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Adam Williamson: > > > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > I updated from F13 to rawhide to

[Fedora QA] #94: Add several release criteria based on feedback from desktop SIGs

2010-06-23 Thread Fedora QA
#94: Add several release criteria based on feedback from desktop SIGs -+-- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:51 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing. > > Thanks for your concerns and suggestions for improvement. :) > > The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending tic

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might > have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I > miss the announcement?) There wasn't a change, that's what we're explaining =) the

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 20:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might > > have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I > > miss the announc

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
See: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-January/087820.html kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Why are Fedora QA trac nagmails being sent to this list?

2010-06-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 22:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > See: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-January/087820.html Thanks, that's what I wanted to know. And of course having checked the link I do now remember seeing it at the time. poc -- test mailing list test@lists.fedo