> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> without SELinux"
>
> from final criteria [1]. If someone wants to switch the selinux off it
> can be easily done from the installed system. Some objections??
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 12:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> > > without SELinux"
> > >
> > > There is no test c
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 08:04 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 09:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> >>> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> >>> without
On 01/31/2012 09:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
"The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux"
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux opti
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> > without SELinux"
> >
> > There is no test case for this now.
> >
> > I have one note on this. There is used nos
> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> without SELinux"
>
> There is no test case for this now.
>
> I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work
> now. I filled bug [2] there is another opti
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:36 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
>
> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> without SELinux"
>
> There is no test case for this
I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
"The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux"
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work
no
ffect Disabled.
> --
>
> ok, f15 boots faster without selinux\* and policy\*
there were no deps to remove. this is great! thank you all very much. once
again fedora proves it's class.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
> it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
And did not affect Disabled.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
2011/5/20 cornel panceac
>
>
> 2011/5/20 JB
>
>> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
>> time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:47 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kevin DeKorte wrote:
>> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
>
> I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
> prohibiting ping -R e
2011/5/20 JB
> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
> time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >
>
> Well, I just looked out the window
cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>
Well, I just looked out the window ...
There are a couple of guys out there, with some
2011/5/20 Tom Horsley
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
> >
> > why not?
>
> Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
> app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
> prob
On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
cornel panceac wrote:
> > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
>
> why not?
Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
probably switch to the gentoo distro and se
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
prohibiting ping -R even when set to Permissive (not Disabled).
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486225
--
test
cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth mailto:m...@cchtml.com>>
>
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the
>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
>> selinux\* policy\*.
>> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
>> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> > and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't
cornel panceac wrote:
> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> selinux\* policy\*.
> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
Side note: This thread is a great c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:36 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
>> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
>> user with too many privs once wh
2011/5/20 Jon Ciesla
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > cornel panceac wrote:
> >
> >> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> >> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >>
> >
> &g
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
> user with too many privs once who removed python.
I cannot remember the exact case, but there was something with
networking (maybe pi
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>>
>
> Define "remove".
>
> If you mean
cornel panceac wrote:
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define "remove".
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If it doesn't
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:14:13PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried,
> (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Just to ask the stupid question, are you aware that it can
cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in
mind? Why Disabled
hello,
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
29 matches
Mail list logo
