Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> It's very unusual for issues with completely different generations of
> adapter to be the same, as so much of the code to support different
> adapters is...different. It's almost out of the realm of possibility
> that there's a bug that affects your adapte
On 06/03/13 02:53 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
On 06/03/13 01:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
(Current Rawhide kernels die as soon as modesetting kicks in, for me, on
a Geforce 9600 GT. I need to get around to triaging it.)
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> On 06/03/13 01:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >> (Current Rawhide kernels die as soon as modesetting kicks in, for me, on
> >> a Geforce 9600 GT. I need to get around to triaging it.)
> >
> > Is what you're talking
On 06/03/13 01:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
(Current Rawhide kernels die as soon as modesetting kicks in, for me, on
a Geforce 9600 GT. I need to get around to triaging it.)
Is what you're talking about anything like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> (Current Rawhide kernels die as soon as modesetting kicks in, for me, on
> a Geforce 9600 GT. I need to get around to triaging it.)
Is what you're talking about anything like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901816 ? I've been having that
problem
On 04/03/13 08:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
OK
I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
didn't have the expected results.
Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does it
change anything?
I did it
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:23:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
> Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
>
> > OK
> > I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
> > didn't have the expected results.
>
> Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
> OK
> I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
> didn't have the expected results.
Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does it
change anything?
> I did it correctly now and I have the rawhide r
OK
I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I didn't have
the expected results.
I did it correctly now and I have the rawhide repo , updated and all went
fine.
only now I can't boot,
Its a uefi installation, secore boot disabled.
I restarted after the yum --releasever=rawhide
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:55:23 +0200, shalom9...@gmail.com wrote:
> I did:
> # yum --releasever=rawhide install fedora-release-rawhide
> # yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
> I compared the yum.repos.d folder to the original before the update and
> nothing changed there, like my repos are still
Hello list
I'm new to fedora. and I usually like a rolling release.
So I just upgraded a fresh fedora 18 kde install to rawhide using the
instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
I did:
# yum --releasever=rawhide install fedora-release-rawhide
# yum --releasev
11 matches
Mail list logo