Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 14:40:55:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/07/2012 11:26 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11:
> >>
> >> On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2012 11:26 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11:
>>
>> On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
Thinking seli
Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11:
>
> On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >>
> >> Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?)
I
> >> rebooted with selinux=0 so that I coul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
>>
>> Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?) I
>> rebooted with selinux=0 so that I could reconfig /e
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500,
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?) I
rebooted with selinux=0 so that I could reconfig /etc/sysconfig/selinux
having SELINUX=permissive, touched /.autorelabel and rebooted again. This
time I
Bruno Wolff III wrote on 12/06/2012 23:48:07:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 15:39:55 -0500,
>john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >
> >Yeah, if I was actually worried about security in this case, that
would've
> >been my usual approach. I had it turned off to bring greater
visibility
> >to other erro
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 15:39:55 -0500,
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
Yeah, if I was actually worried about security in this case, that would've
been my usual approach. I had it turned off to bring greater visibility
to other errors long before F18 alpha and was waiting for this BZ to move
alo
Bruno Wolff III wrote on 12/06/2012 12:10:33:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:03:20 -0500,
>john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >
> >I wasn't expecting this behavior -- figured livecd-creator would be as
> >before or better. I guess for now I need to boot with selinux=0 unless
> >someone has any sug
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:03:20 -0500,
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
I wasn't expecting this behavior -- figured livecd-creator would be as
before or better. I guess for now I need to boot with selinux=0 unless
someone has any suggestions for this problem.
It's normally better to use permis
As one bitten by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858373 I was
hoping to set SELinux back to enforcing on my F18 test box in order to
provide feedback for
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-19802/livecd-tools-18.13-1.fc18
. I've had SEL disabled for quite awhile on th
10 matches
Mail list logo
