noying
> because it
> > interferes with yum. So I go to system-config-services to
> find out if
> > I can kill whatever it is that checks for updates and it
> just dies.
>
> Thanks for the report, it's probably filed alre
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 17:34 -0700, Joshua Andrews wrote:
> > Something is starting an update service which is annoying because it
> > interferes with yum. So I go to system-config-services to find out if
> > I can kil
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 17:34 -0700, Joshua Andrews wrote:
> Something is starting an update service which is annoying because it
> interferes with yum. So I go to system-config-services to find out if
> I can kill whatever it is that checks for updates and it just dies.
Thanks for the rep
Something is starting an update service which is annoying because it
interferes with yum. So I go to system-config-services to find out if I can
kill whatever it is that checks for updates and it just dies.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/sbin/system-config-services", l
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 08:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > And a later post affirms my exact concern (see further down this
> > thread).
> Don't confuse individual opinions with that of a organization.Red
> Hat has continued steadily increasing the amount of people working in
> Fedora QA and
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:10 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > "Typically Fedora isn't used a server"
> >
> > Really?
>
> Well, it's working pretty well for me on my NAS and
> dhcp/tftp/nameserver/general
> boxes at home.
>
> Ymmv but I've been using Fedora on servers since FC1 - I might chose a
On 07/22/2011 06:28 AM, agraham wrote:
Rahul, I did not accuse you of anything except your outstanding
contribution. I did say "I really get the feeling there is another agenda at
work here" and what I was hinting at, was that Redhat are setting the Fedora
agenda such that it NEVER becomes stabl
On 07/21/2011 10:58 AM, Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 11:26 AM, agraham wrote:
>
> Replying here only once, this is not content for test@ IMHO
>
>> I disagree with the propaganda pumped out by RH et al about Fedora being
>> a only test bed for RHEL.
>
> I don't know who is telling that, but
On 07/21/2011 12:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that
>> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years
>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :(
>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 16:10, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 10:26 AM, agraham wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
anything as far as I can tel
On 07/21/2011 10:26 AM, agraham wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>>> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
>>> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
>>> are greyed out.
>>>
>>> How i
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:43 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> It would be more accurate to say "The current Fedora releases are not
> typically used as servers." I expect many are like me and use an older
> Fedora release on servers: F9 in my case, because it does its job well
> and any limitations
On 07/20/2011 08:23 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
> are greyed out.
>
> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
> if services can not be enabled?
>
I know that Nils Ph
It would be more accurate to say "The current Fedora releases are not
typically used as servers." I expect many are like me and use an older
Fedora release on servers: F9 in my case, because it does its job well
and any limitations do not impair its function.
It seems perfectly reasonable to exp
On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>
>
> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that
> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :(
It should concern you very much that you are accusing
On 07/21/2011 11:26 AM, agraham wrote:
Replying here only once, this is not content for test@ IMHO
> I disagree with the propaganda pumped out by RH et al about Fedora being
> a only test bed for RHEL.
I don't know who is telling that, but people at Red Hat for sure do not.
We think of Fedora a
On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
>> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
>> are greyed out.
>>
>> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
>>
On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
> are greyed out.
>
> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
> if services can not be enabled?
Typically Fedora isn'
Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
are greyed out.
How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
if services can not be enabled?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZM
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:04 -0700, Kevin dePfyffer wrote:
> Enable and disable are greyed out. logged in as root or user, I don't
> recall if it was like that before todays update but figured I would
> throw it out there.
> Am I/did I miss something?
Only this bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.
Enable and disable are greyed out. logged in as root or user, I don't
recall if it was like that before todays update but figured I would
throw it out there.
Am I/did I miss something?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
21 matches
Mail list logo
