Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:36:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > There are settings for rotating / pruning the logs > in /etc/systemd/journald.conf , but they don't seem to work terribly > well when you have huge single files. A manual discard command might be > nice, but what I was thinking of R

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 16:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:43:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend > > pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those > > SELinux messages - if you

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:43:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend > pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those > SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you > can safely just

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Frank McCormick
On 06/15/2013 03:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:40 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: Update wants to replace rsyslog on my system- I have downgraded rsyslog to handle the "spamming log problem". [root@franksfedora19 frank]# yum update Loaded plugins: langpack

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:40 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > Update wants to replace rsyslog on my system- I have downgraded > rsyslog to > handle the "spamming log problem". > > > [root@franksfedora19 frank]# yum update > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-pack

Re: rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-14 Thread Adam Williamson
ated to this > version? > > > > > > I had a 60GB /var/log/messages folder.. > > > > Yes; it's really a systemd bug, but downgrading rsyslog will stop > the > > most egregious symptom. I think 7.4.0 went to Rawhide earlier than > F19

Re: rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update, > many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it > spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time. > You might not notice im

Re: rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 16:06 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version? > > I had a 60GB /var/log/messages folder.. Yes; it's really a systemd bug, but downgrading rsyslog will stop the most egregio

Re: rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-14 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi, I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version? I had a 60GB /var/log/messages folder.. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update, > many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it > spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time. > You might not notice im

rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is bad

2013-06-13 Thread Adam Williamson
Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update, many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time. You might not notice immediately if you're not running something that spins its fans up. I reco