On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:44 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I propose we move the existing Data Corruption criterion from Final to
> Beta. The criterion sounds like this:
> "All known bugs that can cause corruption of user data must be fixed or
> documented at Common F34 bugs."
>
> https://fedoraproject.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 3:47 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Yes, that sounds right. We can for example decide that it's sufficient to
> have it documented for Beta, but it needs to be fixed for Final.
>
I like this scenario (at least for some set of data corruption bugs.
Each bug is special and unique,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:58 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:44 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > The reason for this proposal is this bugzilla [1] and this blocker
> ticket [2] where we discussed whether we should ship an older Firefox on
> F33 Beta media, which was known to complete
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:44 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> The reason for this proposal is this bugzilla [1] and this blocker ticket [2]
> where we discussed whether we should ship an older Firefox on F33 Beta media,
> which was known to completely wipe the whole user profile on upgraded
> systems. W
I propose we move the existing Data Corruption criterion from Final to
Beta. The criterion sounds like this:
"All known bugs that can cause corruption of user data must be fixed or
documented at Common F34 bugs."
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
(see f
