On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:51:22PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > procps has a buggy check, I'll send a patch upstream. It's nothing to
> > worry about.
>
> Appears to be cargo-culted into libgtop as well.
>
le sigh. :(
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 19:15 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Non-standard uts for running kernel:
> > release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608
> >
> > Could anyone explain this, and if it is important to worry
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Non-standard uts for running kernel:
> release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608
>
> Could anyone explain this, and if it is important to worry about?
>
procps has a buggy check, I'll send a patch upstream.
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 5:30:30 PM, Rob Healy wrote:
>As much as I am anxious to play around with it, I received this
>on my terminal window when I first opened it
>Non-standard uts for running kernel:
>release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608
>Could anyone ex
Great Afternoon to All of You:
Today, I upgraded my system to the current fc16/ rawhide packages! I was
anxiously skeptical to try the new kernel-3.0-0.rc3.git0-3.fc16.x86_64
kernel because I had no love from the 2.6.39 and kernel-3.0-0 series so far
up to today!
I upgraded to this new kernel, a
