Dear FC;
Thank you very much for taking the time to come to my rescue and defense!
Sometimes people can be very judgmental...
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
> P.S.: I think, this mail is off-topic for this list.
Thanks to
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> P.S.: I think, this mail is off-topic for this list.
Thanks to it I learned about man page placement and formats. I think it
could be considered on-topic as the OP was asking what manpage format is
currently the norm for Fedora in oth
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 17:52 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
> manual files in:
> 1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
> 2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
>
> Which format is also better *.gz or *.1 ???
If y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rob,
On 05/06/2012 07:52 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place
> project manual files in: 1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz,
> or 2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
>
> Which
On 05/06/2012 02:52 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Each man page should accompany the program it documents.
i.e. if a progr
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Which format is also better *.gz or *.1 ???
--
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
