#482: Fedora 24 Qt-Gtk Integration Test Day
---+---
Reporter: jgrulich | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 24
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution: fixed
#482: Fedora 24 Qt-Gtk Integration Test Day
---+---
Reporter: jgrulich | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 24
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution
#482: Fedora 24 Qt-Gtk Integration Test Day
--+
Reporter: jgrulich | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 24
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 08:21 -0600, Stefan Nuxoll wrote:
> A commit to GTK+3 back in March changed the way that GTK determines
> the WmClass, preferring the GApplication ID if it is set when running
> on Wayland [0]. This behavior causes gnome-shell to not match the
> applica
A commit to GTK+3 back in March changed the way that GTK determines the
WmClass, preferring the GApplication ID if it is set when running on Wayland
[0]. This behavior causes gnome-shell to not match the applications to the
relevant .desktop files, resulting in the GApplication ID being
Hey, folks, just wanted to give a summary of the various issues I've
found that are affecting openQA testing of Rawhide at the moment. There
are two apparent rendering issues in GTK+:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752247
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752200
#7522
download size: 15 M
Installed size: 56 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
firewalld-0.3.14
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/firewalld-devel/2015-June/000175.html
firewall-applet:
- new version using Qt4 fixing several issues with the Gtk version
What were the actual issues with the GTK
://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/firewalld-devel/2015-June/000175.html
firewall-applet:
- new version using Qt4 fixing several issues with the Gtk version
What were the actual issues with the GTK+ version?
There have been several issues with the gtk applet:
1) The gtk statusicon widget is
Qt4 firewall-applet is brokne at certain degree within Xfce's Notification Area.
Reverting to GTK+ firewall-applet.
For more informative applet, "Applet icon blinks" and
"Show applet also if firewalld is not running" are enabled per default.
Reloaded GTK+ firewall-apple
> wrote:
> > > > On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be
> > > > > removed soon.
> > > >
> > > > Why do you need a status icon at a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 15:19 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Richard Hughes
>> wrote:
>> > On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner
>> > wrote:
>> > > 1) The gtk sta
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 15:19 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Richard Hughes
> wrote:
> > On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner
> > wrote:
> > > 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be
> > > removed soon.
>
Transaction Summary
>>>> ========
>>>> Install 1 Package (+11 Dependent packages)
>>>>
>>>> Total download size: 15 M
>>>> Installed size: 56 M
version using Qt4 fixing several issues with the Gtk version
What were the actual issues with the GTK+ version?
There have been several issues with the gtk applet:
1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be removed
soon. Going back to gtk2 is not a solution.
Xfce CORE is
=
>> Install 1 Package (+11 Dependent packages)
>>
>> Total download size: 15 M
>> Installed size: 56 M
>> Is this ok [y/d/N]:
>>
>>
>> firewalld-0.3.14
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/firewalld-devel
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner wrote:
>> 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be removed soon.
>
> Why do you need a status icon at all? I can't imagine why I'd want my
> fire
On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be removed soon.
Why do you need a status icon at all? I can't imagine why I'd want my
firewall sending messages to the desktop.
> I plan to port firewall-config also over
packages)
Total download size: 15 M
Installed size: 56 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
firewalld-0.3.14
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/firewalld-devel/2015-June/000175.html
firewall-applet:
- new version using Qt4 fixing several issues with the Gtk version
What were the actual issues with
: 56 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
firewalld-0.3.14
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/firewalld-devel/2015-June/000175.html
firewall-applet:
- new version using Qt4 fixing several issues with the Gtk version
What were the actual issues with the GTK+ version?
--
test mailing list
test
On 27/02/15 09:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
[...]
TC5/TC6 because of the product.img bug. I love whack-a-mole :P
[...]
On the part of moles everywhere, who must remain anonymous for security
reasons, I must protest your cavalier disregard for their well being by
your encouragement to people to
r - how did you get the 32-bit TC5 boot.iso to boot at all?
>
> Yeah disregard, it wasn't TC5. The problem was Chrome redirecting to
> an old page and I got the boot.iso there but didn't notice it.
OK. So the GTK+ bug probably ought to be fixed, but we can't tell in
TC5/TC
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 19:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen -
>> i686 boot.iso
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585
>>
>> I still run into this with TC5 boot.
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 19:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen -
> i686 boot.iso
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585
>
> I still run into this with TC5 boot.iso even though the bug is
> updated saying that Package gtk3-
anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen - i686 boot.iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585
I still run into this with TC5 boot.iso even though the bug is updated
saying that Package gtk3-3.15.9-1.fc22 should fix it.
I can't tell if that version is actuall
On 01/26/2015 12:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I figure a lot of people are going to run into this shortly, so if
> you're running Rawhide and you see lots of white text on Firefox UI
> elements - tab bar titles, buttons, menus - after updating to GTK+
> 3.15.4, I&#x
I figure a lot of people are going to run into this shortly, so if
you're running Rawhide and you see lots of white text on Firefox UI
elements - tab bar titles, buttons, menus - after updating to GTK+
3.15.4, I've filed it already:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11859
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:50 -0400, Rob Healey wrote:
> Dear erald Henriksen:
>
> >I can see from the download.gnome.org site, that they have gtk
> +-3.5.4, and
> >the Fedora koji repository only has gtk+-1.2.10-72 ...
>
> Fedora has packages for gtk+ 1, 2 and 3.
>
Dear erald Henriksen:
>I can see from the download.gnome.org site, that they have gtk+-3.5.4, and
>the Fedora koji repository only has gtk+-1.2.10-72 ...
Fedora has packages for gtk+ 1, 2 and 3.
Search koji for gtk3 (the rpm name for the gtk+-3* versions).
I did not know or understan
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:59:57 -0400, you wrote:
>Greetings:
>
>I can see from the download.gnome.org site, that they have gtk+-3.5.4, and
>the Fedora koji repository only has gtk+-1.2.10-72 ...
Fedora has packages for gtk+ 1, 2 and 3.
Search koji for gtk3 (the rpm name for the gtk+
Greetings:
I can see from the download.gnome.org site, that they have gtk+-3.5.4, and
the Fedora koji repository only has gtk+-1.2.10-72 ...
May I ask why such a huge version difference??? I have always known Fedora
to be on the top of software versions, but certainly not here on this
one
Anyone else has a new [Aurora] GTK theme changed which has more screen space?
I do like it but according to yum.log *no* GTK/theme/whatever was
installed today...
And I'm curious, just in case the changes are undone, to know exactly
what was done, because I'd want them back :)
On 11/10/2011 02:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In that case I wouldn't bother. It's been around a long time anyway, I
> think.
As I added in the bug, it occurred way back when GTK2 was the only
player in town. It was fixed then. Now we have GTK3 and another Requires
needs to be added to gnome-
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 12:32 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to
> > fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it.
>
> It is not going to cause applications to fail, but it will cause l
On 11/10/2011 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to
> fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it.
It is not going to cause applications to fail, but it will cause lots of
people to file bugs.
I've updated the bug and closed a bunch of
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 08:01 -0500, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> This is bug 747449, presumably just a case of a missing dependency. I
> bumped into it when I invoked system-config-users. Because multiple
> applications fail, and therefore can inflict pain on many users, does it
> make sense to add so
This is bug 747449, presumably just a case of a missing dependency. I
bumped into it when I invoked system-config-users. Because multiple
applications fail, and therefore can inflict pain on many users, does it
make sense to add something to "Common Bugs"?
The work-around (install PackageKit-gt
Just a heads up since I came across this while debugging that the --sync
command line option has been deprecated [1] so to provide meaningful
backtrace to maintainers in atleast F15 and onwards you will need to
set "GDK_SYNCHRONIZE" environmental to "1" which will make GDK make all
X requests
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:38 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Good morning:
>
> Ever since yesterday's update for rawhide, it messed up something in gtk...
>
> I was hoping that today's updates(9/30/2010) would fix the problem, but it
> still persists...
>
> It is b
Good morning:
Ever since yesterday's update for rawhide, it messed up something in gtk...
I was hoping that today's updates(9/30/2010) would fix the problem, but it
still persists...
It is blocking/ STOPPING me from using my genealogy software! Is there
someone that can help me
On 09/21/2010 05:04 PM, Tom London wrote:
>
>>
>
> Believe the updated gtk[23] requires a rebuild of gnome-session.
>
> Installing one from
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=196237 made it
> work for me.
>
> tom
>
> [Appears that gtk
rror: /usr/bin/gnome-session:
> undefined symbol: gdk_display
>
> Would this be a result of one of the following updates since no errors
> in the Xorg log?
>
> Sep 21 10:54:24 Updated: gtk2-2.21.8-1.fc15.x86_64
> Sep 21 10:54:28 Updated: gtk3-2.90.7-1.fc15.x86_64
> Sep 21 10:54:30
f one of the following updates since no errors
in the Xorg log?
Sep 21 10:54:24 Updated: gtk2-2.21.8-1.fc15.x86_64
Sep 21 10:54:28 Updated: gtk3-2.90.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Sep 21 10:54:30 Updated: transmission-gtk-2.04-2.fc15.x86_64
Sep 21 10:54:31 Updated: gtk3-immodule-xim-2.90.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Sep 21
On 08/31/2010 01:39 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having problems with some apps in F14 after having updated this morning:
> some apps (vlc, alacarte,...) die with
>
> /usr/bin/python2.7: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:26:24AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >
> > /usr/bin/python2.7: symbol lookup error:
> > /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so: undefined symbol:
> > g_module_make_resident
> >
>
On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having problems with some apps in F14 after having updated this morning:
> some apps (vlc, alacarte,...) die with
>
> /usr/bin/python2.7: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge
Hi,
having problems with some apps in F14 after having updated this morning:
some apps (vlc, alacarte,...) die with
/usr/bin/python2.7: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so: undefined symbol:
g_module_make_resident
or similar.
Anybody sees this too?
--
Joachim
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:18 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > These will get sorted out soon. With the alpha freeze, it has been
> > difficult to get the necessary rebuilds done.
> >
> Having half of the desktop apps not start *at all* otherwise could
> perhaps warrant an exception? Or you could
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:32 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > gedit and rhythmbox crash on my F-14 x86_64 system:
> >
> > $ gedit
> >
> > Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+
On 08/10/10 15:38, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:32 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> gedit and rhythmbox crash on my F-14 x86_64 system:
>>
>> $ gedit
>>
>> Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using G
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:32 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> gedit and rhythmbox crash on my F-14 x86_64 system:
>
> $ gedit
>
> Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in
> the
> same process is not supported
> aborting
Hello,
gedit and rhythmbox crash on my F-14 x86_64 system:
$ gedit
Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the
same process is not supported
aborting...
Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
$ rhythmbox
Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 3 symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK
51 matches
Mail list logo
