On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:41 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>
> This is completely irrelevant. If you want to find out whats going on
> install debug info packages for gnome-shell, mutter, clutter, cogl,
> mesa and X.
> Install sysprof and run sysprof to see where the cpu time is spent.
OK.
https://dl.dr
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 19:41 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Chris Murphy
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >
>> >> F19:
>> >> direct rendering: Yes
>> >> OpenGL renderer str
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 19:41 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> F19:
> >> direct rendering: Yes
> >> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on NV84
> >>GL_MESA_texture_signed_rgba, GL_NV_co
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> F19:
>> direct rendering: Yes
>> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on NV84
>>GL_MESA_texture_signed_rgba, GL_NV_conditional_render, GL_NV_depth_clamp,
>>GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> F19:
> direct rendering: Yes
> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on NV84
>GL_MESA_texture_signed_rgba, GL_NV_conditional_render, GL_NV_depth_clamp,
>GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_conditional_render,
I'm unsure what it
On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> It's not a general issue, I don't think. Confirming John's report, on my
> desktop (9600 GT), CPU usage of Shell when I'm not touching the keyboard
> is 0.7%, and it never goes above 3% in light desktop use.
On the newer laptop it's 1-7% w
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:47 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:44 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
> > On 06/19/2013 06:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, neither the Fedora 18 or 19 Xorg.0.logs contain 'software renderer'
> >> or 'llvmpipe'.
> >>
> >> https://dl.dropboxuserconte
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 18:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:17 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:53 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> >>
> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is o
On 06/19/2013 07:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:44 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
>> On 06/19/2013 06:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, neither the Fedora 18 or 19 Xorg.0.logs contain 'software renderer' or
>>> 'llvmpipe'.
>>>
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801
On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:44 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 06:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> Hmm, neither the Fedora 18 or 19 Xorg.0.logs contain 'software renderer' or
>> 'llvmpipe'.
>>
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/F18_Xorg.0.log
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u
On 06/19/2013 06:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hmm, neither the Fedora 18 or 19 Xorg.0.logs contain 'software renderer' or
> 'llvmpipe'.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/F18_Xorg.0.log
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/F19_Xorg.0.log
>
> For 'glxinfo' on both F18 and 1
On Jun 19, 2013, at 4:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>>> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't
>>> offloading onto the GPU?
>
> During installation, look in /tmp/X.log for which modules get loaded.
> Here is what I see during install for [R200] [RV280] (PCI 1002:5960) Ra
On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:17 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:53 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>>
Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't
offloading onto the GPU?
>>>
>>> $ glxinfo | grep rende
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:53 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
>>> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't
>>> offloading onto the GPU?
>>
>> $ glxinfo | grep renderer
>> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLV
On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:53 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't offloading
>> onto the GPU?
>
> $ glxinfo | grep renderer
> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.3, 128 bits)
>"llvmpipe" is the software CPU (SSE2) re
>> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't offloading
>> onto the GPU?
During installation, look in /tmp/X.log for which modules get loaded.
Here is what I see during install for [R200] [RV280] (PCI 1002:5960) Radeon
9250 (9200 PRO)
where the installed Gnome3 system wil
> Is there a more definitive way to tell if gnome-shell is or isn't offloading
> onto the GPU?
$ glxinfo | grep renderer
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.3, 128 bits)
"llvmpipe" is the software CPU (SSE2) renderer
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD REDWOOD
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> On 06/18/2013 01:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> With the system installed, dragging e.g. a Firefox window, around the
>>> screen approximates the same behavior. gnome-shell is pegged. This doesn't
>>> seem right.
>>
>> The system
On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 01:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> With the system installed, dragging e.g. a Firefox window, around the screen
>> approximates the same behavior. gnome-shell is pegged. This doesn't seem
>> right.
>
> The system I am typin
On 06/18/2013 01:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> With the system installed, dragging e.g. a Firefox window, around the screen
> approximates the same behavior. gnome-shell is pegged. This doesn't seem
> right.
The system I am typing from has the NVIDIA binary driver and experiences
the same "pegged
On Jun 18, 2013, at 12:22 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> If I try to do this in KVM (2x CPU), I see gnome-shell taking 5%, X not even
>> displayed in top, and all CPU power going to rsync (2x 10%) and loop3 (80%).
>
> Please tell us how much virtual RAM was allocated to the KVM instance.
> loop3 at
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a
>> whole core on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is
>> this expected? This is on baremetal, with a
> I did a pxeboot install of today's rsync using the anaconda from TC5.
> I ran top(1) during the install and did not notice any unusual CPU
> utilization.
> This is on a 32 GB 3770K.
Which video graphics card, and which driver?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
> If I try to do this in KVM (2x CPU), I see gnome-shell taking 5%, X not even
> displayed in top, and all CPU power going to rsync (2x 10%) and loop3 (80%).
Please tell us how much virtual RAM was allocated to the KVM instance.
loop3 at 80% CPU for long periods is page thrashing: re-decompressin
On 06/18/2013 06:25 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a
whole core on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is
this expected? This is on baremetal, with a nouveau support
> While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a whole
> core on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is this
> expected? This is on baremetal, with a nouveau supported GPU: NVIDIA
> Corporation G84M [GeForce 8600M GT] [10de:0407]. I wouldn't expect
> gnome-shel
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a
> whole core on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is
> this expected? This is on baremetal, with a nouveau supported GPU:
> NVIDIA Corporation G84M [GeForc
While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a whole core
on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is this expected? This
is on baremetal, with a nouveau supported GPU: NVIDIA Corporation G84M [GeForce
8600M GT] [10de:0407]. I wouldn't expect gnome-shell to ne
28 matches
Mail list logo
