Re: broken less

2010-12-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:17:00 +, Adam wrote: > > I thought we had it so things could only be obsoleted, not deleted. ;( > > also agreed, this should go to fesco, I think. The update is still being offered here, btw, http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/pkgkit-screenshot-201012241255UTC.png lin

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 11:08 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:01:39 +0100 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Well, then the update submitter has deleted the old ticket, which IMO > > is a MUST NOT. Several times before I've seen users referring to > > updates they installed and whic

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:01:39 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > Well, then the update submitter has deleted the old ticket, which IMO > is a MUST NOT. Several times before I've seen users referring to > updates they installed and which were still being offered by > Yum/PackageKit at that time, but n

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
> > >> > > > >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it? > > > >> > > > > > > > > but is it broken LESS or broken MORE? > > > > > > For me completely :) > > > > It's known. S

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Adam Williamson
- anyone else see it? > > >> > > > > > > but is it broken LESS or broken MORE? > > > > For me completely :) > > It's known. See its ticket in the Fedora Updates system "bodhi". I only see a -8 build there, with positive karma. I do s

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:10:33 +0100, Michał wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it? > >> > > > > but is it broken LESS or broke

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/12/23 seth vidal : > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it? >> > > but is it broken LESS or broken MORE? For me completely :) > > Zing! > > so

Re: broken less

2010-12-23 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it? > but is it broken LESS or broken MORE? Zing! sorry, couldn't resist. -sv -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

broken less

2010-12-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it? -- Best regards, Michal Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test