On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 17:18 +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > > But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> > > especially on laptops, and
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> > especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary
> > complication. And do not like or n
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary
> complication. And do not like or need LVM.
Why do you care? (Not in a snarky way, but literally -- what is
rs are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary
> complication. And do not like or need LVM.
>
> I certainly don't and would like to see this option back
> for 'automatic partitioning' so that I don'
r need LVM.
I certainly don't and would like to see this option back
for 'automatic partitioning' so that I don't have to do
the unnecessary extra work involved with custom partitioning.
I have no need of special disk layouts so I mostly do
quick uncomplicated default installs
