Re: Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

2025-04-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:58 PM James Szinger wrote: > > > I'd like to nominate Bug 2360491 - Postfix missing alternative > > /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/sendmail.postfix > > > > as a

Re: Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

2025-04-29 Thread Kamil Paral
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:58 PM James Szinger wrote: > I'd like to nominate Bug 2360491 - Postfix missing alternative > /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/sendmail.postfix > > as a common bug for Fedora 42 and a blocker for Fedora 43. > You can

Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

2025-04-28 Thread James Szinger
endmail is not maintained during the /usr/sbin merge leaving many programs unable to send mail after the upgrade. Thanks, Jim -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Log your reports for F42 Upgrade Test Days

2025-04-01 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, This is a gentle reminder that we are hosting Upgrade Test Week[0] starting today and going through the whole week. Please record your upgrade experiences in [1] This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) and then resolve them (if they end up blocking). [0

Re: F41 => F42 upgrade report

2025-03-16 Thread old sixpack13
forgot to mention: it's an Intel box if I got it right: compiler fix seems on the way: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: F41 => F42 upgrade report

2025-03-15 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 08:32:13PM +, old sixpack13 wrote: > upgrade went smooth > Thanks I've been playing with F42. One nice thing, that will probably only affect a few people. For awhile, FreeBSD's bhyve virtualization was having issues on AMD machines with RH based systems

F41 => F42 upgrade report

2025-03-15 Thread old sixpack13
upgrade went smooth Thanks a few minor things so far: - selinux error gnome shell - homebrewed kernel 6.13.7 does not compile, but 6.14.0-rc6 does compile lot of [-Wunterminated-string-initialization]- errors tried gcc-15.0.1-0.10 too -- ___ test

41 to 42 upgrade notes VM & Native

2025-02-11 Thread Ian Laurie via test
Upgraded a VirtualBox guest from 41 to 42 (with RPMFusion multimedia installed) without incident. I have to boot an older 41 kernel because of BZ2339180 otherwise I have an unusable screen size, no copy/paste with host, and no shared folders. Hopefully the BZ gets fixed soon. Upgraded an Intran

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-20 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:56 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > But we *don't* only care about that. We *do* want to make sure that > upgrade doesn't suddenly turn your KDE install into Workstation, for > instance. > OK. What if we made it more explicit, since this is clearly one

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-16 Thread Adam Williamson
which relied on a footnote to > > the Beta upgrade criterion which was added way back when we first set > > up the Editions: > > > > "The upgraded system must include all packages that would be present on > > the system after a default installation from install

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-16 Thread Kamil Paral
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > the Beta upgrade criterion which was added way back wh

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
What about packages that used to be dependencies but are no longer so? The "unused dependencies" packages. (Sorry if this email is misformated, I am not subscribed to this list, so I use the web interface.) -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedor

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-06 Thread pmkellly
Looks good to me. Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 2:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to &

Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

2025-01-06 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my todo list... Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to the Beta upgrade criterion which was added way back when we first set up the Editions: "The upgraded system must include all pac

Re: Fedora 41 Beta iio-sensor-proxy stopped working after dnf upgrade

2024-11-06 Thread Patrick Lang via test
ccurred. The beta > install works correctly until the dnf upgrade. > > I am new to this and not sure how to work out what part of the dnf update > caused this or whether/how this should be reported as a bug. > > Any help would be appreciated. > -- >

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-23 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/23/24 11:54, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 03:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch was not removed (had a duplicate of 41) by the upgrade. This caused dnf to think I was still on 39 and why all the 39 packages remained Duplicate

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 03:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: > > fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch was not removed (had a > duplicate of 41) by the upgrade. This caused dnf to > think I was still on 39 and why all the 39 packages > remained Duplicate packages (other than a h

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-22 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/22/24 7:48 AM, Scott Dowdle via test wrote: On Monday, October 21st, 2024 at 5:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-22 Thread Scott Dowdle via test
On Monday, October 21st, 2024 at 5:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: > Hi All, > > I do not know if this is the correct place for > this, but ... > > Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! > > Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. > &

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-22 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/21/24 16:00, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird.  Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wants to download 3000+ FC39 rpm&#x

Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wants to download 3000+ FC39 rpm's. And "rpm -qa" shows 39 on every

Re: Log your reports for F41 Upgrade Test Days

2024-10-14 Thread Luna Jernberg
>> A gentle reminder, today will be the last day to record your upgrade >> experiences in [0] >> This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) >> and then resolve >> them (if they end up blocking). >> >> [0] http://fedoraproject.

Re: Log your reports for F41 Upgrade Test Days

2024-10-14 Thread Luna Jernberg
Decided to jump in and test today Den mån 14 okt. 2024 kl 04:30 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > Hey All, > > A gentle reminder, today will be the last day to record your upgrade > experiences in [0] > This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) and > t

Log your reports for F41 Upgrade Test Days

2024-10-13 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, A gentle reminder, today will be the last day to record your upgrade experiences in [0] This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) and then resolve them (if they end up blocking). [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-10-11_F41_Upgrade_Test_Day

Fedora 41 Beta iio-sensor-proxy stopped working after dnf upgrade

2024-10-13 Thread manthony . nw
, iio-sensor-proxy no longer updates. I tried loading the original kernel from the beta install, but it still does not work. I installed the beta to another tablet and the same thing occurred. The beta install works correctly until the dnf upgrade. I am new to this and not sure how to work out

Fedora 41 Beta iio-sensor-proxy stopped working after dnf upgrade

2024-10-13 Thread manthony . nw
, iio-sensor-proxy no longer updates. I tried loading the original kernel from the beta install, but it still does not work. I installed the beta to another tablet and the same thing occurred. The beta install works correctly until the dnf upgrade. I am new to this and not sure how to work out

[Test Days] Fedora Virt and Upgrade happening NOW!

2024-10-10 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey Folks, As the GA date comes closer; we are trying to test the last few bits in Fedora. Fedora takes pride in smooth upgrades and to ensure this we host Upgrade Test Day[0]. This time we are hosting it from 2024-10-11 through 2024-10-15. This installment of test day is, however, a bit special

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 07:46:12 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It is necessary, or otherwise rpm doesn't know that an upgrade > requires the old package to be uninstalled first. It will do it out of > order and fail like the original poster stated. Originally, it would be avoided

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:39 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > > Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: > > > ... >

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Joachim Backes
On 06.10.24 13:39, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: ... sudo dnf upgrade Breaks with: transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed.   - file /usr/lib64/libtesseract.so.5.4.1 from install of

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 7:39 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: > > ... > > sudo dnf upgrade > > > > Breaks with: > > > > transaction

Re: Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:55:08 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: > ... > sudo dnf upgrade > > Breaks with: > > transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. >   - file /usr/lib64/libtesseract.so.5.4.1 from install of >

Upgrade error problem in F41

2024-10-06 Thread Joachim Backes
Having a problem when upgrading an installed F41: ... sudo dnf upgrade Breaks with: transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed.   - file /usr/lib64/libtesseract.so.5.4.1 from install of tesseract-libs-5.4.1-4.fc41.x86_64 conflicts with file from package tesseract-5.4.1-2.fc41.x86_64 Anybody

Re: upgrade report F40 => F41

2024-09-18 Thread old sixpack13
I filled a gnome bugreport: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3581 -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproj

upgrade report F40 => F41

2024-09-17 Thread old sixpack13
upgrade went smooth. Thanks ! But I got some trouble: opening nautilus or gnome-system-setting (more ?, but not all apps !) only open with a delay. independend if running Xorg or wayland it also happens with an, under F41, new created user ! where the delay only occurs once (short tested with

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-27 Thread Ian Laurie
On 3/28/24 2:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: It's not generally necessary, but if we wanted to get this fix into F40 Final and it did not land before Final freeze on Tuesday, it would need an FE bug. Despite 6 other bugs being classified as a duplicate of this one, the bug has not received a lot

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 15:32 +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > On 3/27/24 3:11 PM, Ian Laurie wrote: > > Upstream bug: > > > > https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/1348 > > Given that there is an upstream bug, and my toolbox test day results > link to it, do you still want me to file a RHBZ as we

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-26 Thread Ian Laurie
On 3/27/24 3:11 PM, Ian Laurie wrote: Upstream bug: https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/1348 Given that there is an upstream bug, and my toolbox test day results link to it, do you still want me to file a RHBZ as well? -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney --

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-26 Thread Ian Laurie
On 3/27/24 2:15 PM, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: Hey Ian, I have upgraded from F39 to F40 and followed the steps you did, I can't replicate this error. Here's my log https://paste.centos.org/view/61931a20 I have found the underlying problem. "If a user is

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-26 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey Ian, I have upgraded from F39 to F40 and followed the steps you did, I can't replicate this error. Here's my log https://paste.centos.org/view/61931a20 On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 8:36 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Can you please report this for the test day here > https://testdays.fedoraproje

Re: toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-26 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Can you please report this for the test day here https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/181 and also file an issue at RHBZ under toolbox On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 8:25 AM Ian Laurie wrote: > I can create containers in toolbox but cannot enter them anymore. > > I issued a "podman system reset",

toolbox not working after upgrade to 40

2024-03-26 Thread Ian Laurie
I can create containers in toolbox but cannot enter them anymore. I issued a "podman system reset", followed by "toolbox create" and "toolbox enter" but I still get "Error: failed to start container fedora-toolbox-40". This is the first time trying to enter a container since upgrading from 39 to

Re: 39 to 40 upgrade report

2024-03-17 Thread old sixpack13
as of today both bugs seems to be fixed. the last one with glib2-2.80.0-1.fc40.x86_64 -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorap

Re: 39 to 40 upgrade report

2024-03-11 Thread old sixpack13
in case someone want to move to F40 too 2 Bugs: thunderbird on gnome Xorg https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3329 gnome-extensions-app: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268929 -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.

39 to 40 upgrade report

2024-03-10 Thread old sixpack13
all smooth (here) Thanks !!! -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines

Re: Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 11:29 +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > On 2/16/24 4:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Before removing it, it would be useful if you could try and figure out > > what pulled it in. Does anything suggests: or recommends: it, or does > > it enhances: or supplements: anything else? > >

Re: Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-15 Thread Ian Laurie
On 2/16/24 4:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Before removing it, it would be useful if you could try and figure out what pulled it in. Does anything suggests: or recommends: it, or does it enhances: or supplements: anything else? I'm going to need help wielding that sort of command line magic. M

Re: Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-15 Thread Marc Dionne
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:03 PM Felix Miata wrote: > > Ian Laurie composed on 2024-02-15 18:05 (UTC+1100): > > > (2) Password needed to be updated as per what happened with Rawhide a > > few weeks ago ~ login warning about my password expiring (it was set to > > never expire). I'm guessing a file

Re: Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-15 Thread Felix Miata
Ian Laurie composed on 2024-02-15 18:05 (UTC+1100): > (2) Password needed to be updated as per what happened with Rawhide a > few weeks ago ~ login warning about my password expiring (it was set to > never expire). I'm guessing a file format changed somewhere? I've done at least 3 upgrades where

Re: Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 18:05 +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > Yes I know we're just a day from the branch... but I upgraded an Xfce > workstation/Intranet server today to see how things would go. A few > observations: > > (1) The upgrade required the --allowerasing option which

Fedora 39 to 40 upgrade experience

2024-02-14 Thread Ian Laurie
Yes I know we're just a day from the branch... but I upgraded an Xfce workstation/Intranet server today to see how things would go. A few observations: (1) The upgrade required the --allowerasing option which uninstalled intel-media-driver from RPM Fusion due to a conflict with a related F

Re: [Fedora Rawhide][x86 MacBook] Can’t boot after dnf system-upgrade 39 to Rawhide

2023-10-20 Thread Osama Albahrani via test
> Can you display the GRUB menu (listing all the installed kernels), when you > repeatedly press F8 after starting the laptop? I tried, and as far as I could tell repeatedly pressing F8 did not display the GRUB menu. I started pressing as soon as I selected the partition. > (A question is whethe

Re: [Fedora Rawhide][x86 MacBook] Can’t boot after dnf system-upgrade 39 to Rawhide

2023-10-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:37 PM Osama Albahrani via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I wanted to test Fedora Rawhide so I ran `dnf system-upgrade download > --releasever rawhide --exclude=sdubby` (as per > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22

[Fedora Rawhide][x86 MacBook] Can’t boot after dnf system-upgrade 39 to Rawhide

2023-10-18 Thread Osama Albahrani via test
Hi! I wanted to test Fedora Rawhide so I ran `dnf system-upgrade download --releasever rawhide --exclude=sdubby` (as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243872#c12) to upgrade from Fedora 39 and it finished successfully. However after I ran `dnf system-upgrade reboot` and got a black

Fedora 39 Upgrade Test Day is underway!

2023-10-05 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, As we come closer to Fedora 39 release dates, it's time to test upgrades. Fedora 39 has a lot of changesets and it becomes essential that we test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line. As a part of this test day[0], we will test upgrading from a full updated, F3

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-10-03 Thread old sixpack13
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2023 17:03:12 - ... > > Given your data, I don't think either of these is your issue. I'm out > of ideas. anyway, thanks for support ! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le..

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-10-03 Thread stan via test
On Mon, 02 Oct 2023 17:03:12 - "old sixpack13" wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:50:31 - > > "old sixpack13" > > > > > This is just a wild guess, but the tzdata package was recently > > dropped as required by some packages. Is it possible some fallout > > from this is the source of yo

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-10-02 Thread old sixpack13
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:50:31 - > "old sixpack13" > > This is just a wild guess, but the tzdata package was recently dropped > as required by some packages. Is it possible some fallout from this is > the source of your problem? Do you have the tzdata package(s) > installed? > rpm -qa|gre

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-10-01 Thread stan via test
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:50:31 - "old sixpack13" wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 09:28 +0200, František Šumšal wrote: > > > > It looks like they are in 254.5, which is on its way to > > updates-testing for F39 now: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3355cdb0a8 > > unfo

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-30 Thread old sixpack13
> On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 09:28 +0200, František Šumšal wrote: > > It looks like they are in 254.5, which is on its way to updates-testing > for F39 now: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3355cdb0a8 unfortunately, nit fixed with 254.5-2.fc39 still seeing: - journal: Realtime cl

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-28 Thread old sixpack13
> > It looks like they are in 254.5, which is on its way to updates-testing > for F39 now: Thanks ! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 09:28 +0200, František Šumšal wrote: > On 9/28/23 01:11, old sixpack13 wrote: > > > On 9/27/23 17:44, old sixpack13 wrote: > > > > > > I don't know what is the exact journal message you're seeing, but [0] > > > (and [1]) > > > might be related. > > > > > > [0] https://githu

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-28 Thread old sixpack13
> On 9/28/23 01:11, old sixpack13 wrote: > > As far as I know yes, the potential fixes from [1] are not in any released or > stable > systemd version. Okay, thanks for input/Clarification ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-28 Thread František Šumšal
On 9/28/23 01:11, old sixpack13 wrote: On 9/27/23 17:44, old sixpack13 wrote: I don't know what is the exact journal message you're seeing, but [0] (and [1]) might be related. [0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/28250 [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29017 Exact ! remain

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-27 Thread old sixpack13
> On 9/27/23 17:44, old sixpack13 wrote: > > I don't know what is the exact journal message you're seeing, but [0] (and > [1]) > might be related. > > [0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/28250 > [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29017 Exact ! remaining question: is it in ne

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-27 Thread František Šumšal
On 9/27/23 17:44, old sixpack13 wrote: since F38 it happens to me that the dir for the journals is filled up with a lot of small journals (~5 MB) and something regarding time I don't know what is the exact journal message you're seeing, but [0] (and [1]) might be related. [0] https://github.

Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-27 Thread old sixpack13
well, grandpa sixpack s/Question to F39/Question to F39 users/ ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/

Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

2023-09-27 Thread old sixpack13
since F38 it happens to me that the dir for the journals is filled up with a lot of small journals (~5 MB) and something regarding time Is this still the case with F39 *new* installs (explicit *NOT* upgrades, e.g. F38 => F39) ___ test mailing list -- t

Re: system-upgrade on RPi fails

2023-08-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:06 PM Alessio wrote: > > Hello. > I don't remember if it has always been this way. > I was trying to upgrade from Fedora 38 to 39 on a Raspberry. > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=39 > > The point is that on the subsequent bo

system-upgrade on RPi fails

2023-08-21 Thread Alessio
Hello. I don't remember if it has always been this way. I was trying to upgrade from Fedora 38 to 39 on a Raspberry. sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=39 The point is that on the subsequent boot, following  dnf system-upgrade reboot the operation fails because the sign

Re: Post 38 to 39 upgrade cannot launch QEMU/KVM VMs via virt-manager

2023-08-18 Thread Ian Laurie
On 8/19/23 00:49, Adam Williamson wrote: Can you file a bug against libvirt on this, with details of how you upgraded? Can you also check the DNF logs and see if there's any relevant-looking output during the upgrade indicating that maybe a scriptlet went wrong? OK done:

Re: Post 38 to 39 upgrade cannot launch QEMU/KVM VMs via virt-manager

2023-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
d to do this: > > sudo systemctl enable virtqemud > sudo systemctl start virtqemud > > I think this needs to be looked into. Before the upgrade stuff was > working fine. Can you file a bug against libvirt on this, with details of how you upgraded? Can you also check th

Re: Post 38 to 39 upgrade cannot launch QEMU/KVM VMs via virt-manager

2023-08-18 Thread Ian Laurie
t as far as the reported problem I also had to do this: sudo systemctl enable virtqemud sudo systemctl start virtqemud I think this needs to be looked into. Before the upgrade stuff was working fine. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: A

Re: Post 38 to 39 upgrade cannot launch QEMU/KVM VMs via virt-manager

2023-08-17 Thread Ian Laurie
On 8/18/23 11:40, Ian Laurie wrote: I upgraded a 38 workstation/server from 38 to 39.  The only casualty so far seems to be that virt-manager can no longer launch VMs. Trying to do so results in this: Error starting domain: Failed to connect socket t

Post 38 to 39 upgrade cannot launch QEMU/KVM VMs via virt-manager

2023-08-17 Thread Ian Laurie
= Can anyone offer some insight before I create a BZ for this? I suspect it is an upgrade issue maybe? Thanks, Ian -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedo

Fedora 38 Upgrade Test Day 2023-03-28

2023-03-28 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, As we come closer to Fedora 38 release dates, it's time to test upgrades. Fedora 38 has a lot of changesets and it becomes essential that we test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line. As a part of this test day[0], we will test upgrading from a full updated, F3

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-15 Thread Scott Beamer
rawhide. I'm gonna let it go for now.  None of this is on a production machine, anyway. I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
g to rawhide. > > > I'm gonna let it go for now.  None of this is on a production machine, > > > anyway. > > I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all > > over, I > > tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal w

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-13 Thread Scott Beamer
did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf. Yeah, sounds like we&#x

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-13 Thread Felix Miata
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800): > I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the > repos are still pointing to rawhide. > I'm gonna let it go for now.  None of this is on a production machine, > anyway. I just did a system-upgrad

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-12 Thread Scott Beamer
On 2/12/23 4:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800): Felix Miata wrote: Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800): My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched. My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-12 Thread Felix Miata
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800): > Felix Miata wrote: >> Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800): >>> My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched. >> My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right awa

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-12 Thread Scott Beamer
On 2/12/2023 10:24 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800): My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched. My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed

Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-12 Thread Felix Miata
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800): > My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched. My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade --releasever=38 --s

How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?

2023-02-12 Thread Scott Beamer
Greetings. My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched. I know I've been successful in the past with these types of upgrades, but I don't recall how I did it, and Googling hasn't given me the answer. TIA Scott _

Re: What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

2023-01-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 02:40 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to > leave the system in an unknown state. > > How does one recover from this situation? > checkdupes: package-cleanup --dupes packa

Re: What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

2023-01-29 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023, George R Goffe via test wrote: Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to leave the system in an unknown state. How does one recover from this situation? I believe the standard advice is to make a backup and reinstall. Making a backup likely

Re: What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

2023-01-29 Thread stan via test
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:40:58 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to > leave the system in an unknown state. > > How does one recover from this situation? I assume you are on rawhide, since you are asking on t

What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

2023-01-28 Thread George R Goffe via test
Hi, Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to leave the system in an unknown state. How does one recover from this situation? Best regards, George... ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

First glance issues after upgrade (Nautilus & display properties)

2022-09-23 Thread A fox
After upgrading from Fedora 36 testing to Fedora 37 testing the following first glance issues appeared: Display: The desktop wallpaper was lost; monitor refresh rate had to be readjusted. Nautilus (43.0-1.fc37): Column settings were lost; there seems to be a scrolling issue; the star column can´

Re: Upgrade blocker /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver

2022-09-23 Thread A fox
That was the problem. I enabled the testing repo and the upgrade process finished successfully. Thank you ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Upgrade blocker /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver

2022-09-23 Thread Kamil Paral
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:12 PM RS wrote: > When trying to upgrade to Fedora 37 Beta with the system-upgrade Plugin > like so: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37 > > I get the following error: > > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/bin/WebK

Re: Upgrade blocker /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver

2022-09-23 Thread A fox
I tried the suggested additional arguments but it didn´t change the output. Maybe it is helpful to add that the testing machine uses the updates-testing repository like so: dnf update --enablerepo=updates-testing ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fed

Re: Upgrade blocker /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver

2022-09-23 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
Hello, have you fully updated your system before trying to perform the upgrade? The recommended workflow is: 1. dnf update --refresh 2. dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37 You might want to use the following arguments with the second command that will remove conflicting packages

Upgrade blocker /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver

2022-09-23 Thread RS
When trying to upgrade to Fedora 37 Beta with the system-upgrade Plugin like so: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37 I get the following error: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file

Re: Upgrade upgrade-testing Of kf5-akonadi-mime Fails

2022-05-21 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Saturday, May 21, 2022 2:34:53 AM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2022-05-20 15:23, Garry T. Williams wrote: > > Anyone know what I managed to mess up here? > > > > Update using updates-testing gives this error: > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > >file /usr/share/config.kcfg/specialmailc

Re: Upgrade upgrade-testing Of kf5-akonadi-mime Fails

2022-05-21 Thread stan via test
On Fri, 20 May 2022 23:34:53 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2022-05-20 15:23, Garry T. Williams wrote: > > Anyone know what I managed to mess up here? > > > > Update using updates-testing gives this error: > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > >file /usr/share/config.kcfg/specialmailcolle

Re: Upgrade upgrade-testing Of kf5-akonadi-mime Fails

2022-05-20 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2022-05-20 15:23, Garry T. Williams wrote: Anyone know what I managed to mess up here? Update using updates-testing gives this error: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/config.kcfg/specialmailcollections.kcfg from install of kf5-akonadi-mime-22.04.1-1.fc36.x86_64 conflicts wi

Upgrade upgrade-testing Of kf5-akonadi-mime Fails

2022-05-20 Thread Garry T. Williams
Anyone know what I managed to mess up here? Update using updates-testing gives this error: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/config.kcfg/specialmailcollections.kcfg from install of kf5-akonadi-mime-22.04.1-1.fc36.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kdepimlibs-4.14.10-39.fc36.

Re: dnf system-upgrade conflict

2022-03-04 Thread Alessio
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 07:14 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It is planned to fix it: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2765 Oh. Great. Thank you. A. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedora

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >