On 10/13/2011 10:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>>>
Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> >
> > > Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> > > problem?
> >
> > Not sure ab
Please check logrotate - for me it doesn't work also.
Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
> > Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> > problem?
>
> Not sure about that one, haven't seen it on either of my systems. They
> both log
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> problem?
Not sure about that one, haven't seen it on either of my systems. They
both log me in successfully every time.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
On 10/12/2011 12:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Erinn Looney-Triggs gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
>> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
>> and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mea
Erinn Looney-Triggs gmail.com> writes:
> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
> and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mean three
> weeks ago). Now I can see in /etc/grub2.cf
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:52 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> One is a little silly, the other is a pain.
>
> The easy one:
>
> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
> and blah is a very
One is a little silly, the other is a pain.
The easy one:
Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mean three
weeks ago). Now I can see in /e
