На 18.12.2013 20:09, Tim Flink написа:
On a side note, it might be interesting to find out what percentage of
packages are running things in %check. I don't know what we would do
with that metric, but I think it would be interesting :)
Hi Tim,
I did a quick measurement and the number of packag
Well, I think travis can just be a supplemental part of %check, like
we can run it after package building, and paste its results as "for
reference only".
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
На 18.12.2013 20:09, Tim Flink написа:
On a side note, it might be interesting to find out what percentage of
packages are running things in %check. I don't know what we would do
with that metric, but I think it would be interesting :)
I have something in the works which can be modified to ext
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:52:59 +0200
Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
> this message sparked an interest:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/python-bugzilla/2013-December/000200.html
>
> In addition to that I've inspected around 30 packages which seem to
> be missing an upstream test s
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:52:59 +0200
Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
> this message sparked an interest:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/python-bugzilla/2013-December/000200.html
>
> In addition to that I've inspected around 30 packages which seem to
> be missing an upstream test s
On mið 18.des 2013 15:52, Alexander Todorov wrote:
* Are there any volunteers to join me in planning and coordinating
this project? We need to somehow prioritize which packages need
inspection and working on, count the available test cases, report bugs
if missing, produce patches, etc. It w
Hi folks,
this message sparked an interest:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/python-bugzilla/2013-December/000200.html
In addition to that I've inspected around 30 packages which seem to be missing
an upstream test suite (a few have one but it is not automatically executed in
%check sec
