Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 11/04/2012 04:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 03:29 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 03:29 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > > >> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install > >> F18 will it detect that the

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:03, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Bad news: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759303 > > Jesse, any chance you're going to change your mind here? :) Not for F18. - jlk -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedorapr

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > >> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install >> F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and >> overwrite only the binary

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install > F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and > overwrite only the binary bits and only add the new install to the grub menu?

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 11/04/2012 01:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 20:30 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote: > >we should make this possible via a command line parameter rather than a UI > >option; it's an 'advanced' option that's only of use to multiboot > >pokemoners (you know...gotta catch 'em all) and is a 'dangerous' option > >for anyone who d

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Richard Ryniker
>we should make this possible via a command line parameter rather than a UI >option; it's an 'advanced' option that's only of use to multiboot >pokemoners (you know...gotta catch 'em all) and is a 'dangerous' option >for anyone who doesn't understand it - if you pick it when you don't know >what yo

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:10 +0100, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's > > still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log > > for it, but I may have missed it

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Nov 4, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > What I would like to see is proper support for UEFI multiboot. Right now > installing a new Fedora next to the live one is difficult since it doesn't > support creating individual UEFI boot entried for each installation but > only a gl

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's > >> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's >> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log >> for it, but I may have missed it. I've adde

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's > still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log > for it, but I may have missed it. I've added bcl and dlehman to the bug > and asked them to comm

Re: TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 19:42 +, Ron Yorston wrote: > I tried to install using the F18 Beta TC7 Live CD, but couldn't find > any way to specify that the bootloader should go onto the root > partition rather than the MBR. Is this possible? It used to be. > > I see someone has already raised a b

TC7 bootloader installation

2012-11-03 Thread Ron Yorston
I tried to install using the F18 Beta TC7 Live CD, but couldn't find any way to specify that the bootloader should go onto the root partition rather than the MBR. Is this possible? It used to be. I see someone has already raised a bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=87282