On 3/27/21 2:42 PM, David wrote:
My wi-fi speed jumped up to 21 Mbps. Is that good enough to do updates
in Fedora Rawhide ?
I don't understand why you keep asking this same question. Speed is
irrelevant and signal quality is irrelevant to the capability to do
updates. It will only effe
It looks like my install of Rawhide WS is up-to-date and working
nominally.
Chromium still crashes. But Gnome Web seemed to work fine.
This was a quickie-look at several applications only, playing one game of
FreeCell with Aisleriot, surfing the web, watching YouTube, etc. Updated
GIMP in G
The link below is a screenshot showing the readout from the command "inxi
-F."
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ywi787vkk5h6wya/Rawhide_Workstation.png
I have to open two terminals to see the full readout, but would normally
just scroll down to see the bottom missing
part.
I think a B550 motherb
On 11/13/20 10:00 AM, David wrote:
I have been getting this message for about two or three weeks, but have
just ignored it.
Is there anything I can do on my end to fix it ?
There's nothing you can do. Continue ignoring it.
Problem: package corectrl-1.1.1-2.fc34.x86_64 requires
libbotan-2.
I have been getting this message for about two or three weeks, but have
just ignored it.
Is there anything I can do on my end to fix it ?
Problem: package corectrl-1.1.1-2.fc34.x86_64 requires
libbotan-2.so.16()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both botan2-2.
On 11/10/20 11:39 PM, David wrote:
My reboot seemed to work fine. What test should I run to see if it is
not behaving
nominally ?
Nothing. If it booted the new kernel version then everything's fine.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproje
I guess kernel regression testing for a start should do.
On Wed, 11 Nov, 2020, 1:09 PM David, wrote:
> My reboot seemed to work fine.What test should I run to see if it is
> not behaving
> nominally ?
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedorap
My reboot seemed to work fine.What test should I run to see if it is
not behaving
nominally ?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://doc
On 11/10/20 4:38 PM, David wrote:
Rawhide updated on my install today, below is something that looks
like an error message:
Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.10.0-0.rc3.68.fc34.x86_64
78/78
sort: fflush failed: 'standard output': Broken pipe
sort: write error
Looks like somethin
Rawhide updated on my install today, below is something that looks
like an error message:
Cleanup : glibc-all-langpacks-2.32.9000-14.fc34.x86_64
75/78
Cleanup : glibc-common-2.32.9000-14.fc34.x86_64
76/78
Cleanup : glibc-langpack-en-2.32.9000-14.fc34.x86_64
77/78
Clean
Today's update went smoothly for me.
gdm updated, but the boot-up process still goes straight from boot-up to
gnome
having only to authenticate, to begin work.
D.L.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to te
After the update today, I no longer have to do the "enforcing=0"
maneuver. However, I now no longer
get the login-screen, and instead go straight to gnome with a dialogue to
authenticate.
I have Rawhide on the motherboard's primary NVMe and Fedora 33 Beta on the
secondary NVMe.
Both updated
Today's update went nice on my install
$ sudo dnf list installed kernel
[sudo] password:
Installed Packages
kernel.x86_645.8.0-0.rc4.1.fc33
@rawhide
kernel.x86_645.8.0-0.rc4.20200708gitdcde237b9b0e.1.fc33
@rawhide
kernel.x86_645.8.0-0.rc4.20200709git0b
On 7/3/20 8:47 AM, David wrote:
I have begun accumulating parts for a new computer. I only need a
new cpu to
have a functional new machine. But I won't have the money for the
cpu for a while,
due to unemployment. Probably getting a Ryzen 7, but I could wait
and save
up for the Ryze
My last update, on my install, seems to work nominally.
$ sudo dnf list installed kernel
[sudo] password:
Installed Packages
kernel.x86_645.8.0-0.rc3.1.fc33
@rawhide
kernel.x86_645.8.0-0.rc3.20200630git7c30b859a947.1.fc33
@rawhide
kernel.x86_645.8.0-
On my install, today's update went nominally.
My system seems to run fine on the rc3 version of 5.8.0.
There is a new version of GnuCash. I need to learn how to
use that program.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have been running "sudo dnf update" at least once per day for the past
two weeks, and only had one
update of any significance a few days ago.
Yesterday, June 22, when I ran "sudo dnf update," the readout was "nothing
to do."
But when I powered off, it self-updated a whole bunch of stuff, and
re
On Fri, 2020-05-01 at 10:22 -0500, David wrote:
> On my install, the updates today appeared to go well.
>
> htop looks good
>
> I see some firmware options in gnome that I have not noticed before,
> however, I did not see anyway to update the firmware from the gui.
Firmware updates from the GUI
On my install, the updates today appeared to go well.
htop looks good
I see some firmware options in gnome that I have not noticed before,
however, I did not see anyway to update the firmware from the gui.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@l
Today's install and rc3 kernel look good.htop memory usage
seems to be high.
The list below is just to show a partial status of my install:
It is just a list of some gnome packages, ( I simplified the list by
removing the suffix, "x86_64" ).
*$ sudo dnf list installed gnome**
*Installed P
On 4/17/20 9:26 PM, David wrote:
What goes on in dnf during a "transaction check?" I would recommend
that dnf word some things or items better, or at least provide an easy
resource
somewhere to explain things like "scriptlet."
If you're doing something like running dnf from the command l
Correction
htop is idling really low. 0.1 % on all four cores ( fluctuates
between 0.0 and 2.0, with a spike of 3.2
sometimes)
with memory at 847 MB ( Gnome )
The numbers obviously go up when Firefox is running, but YouTube really
sent the numbers
higher than what I think I normally see.
This is just about my install and today's update.
htop seems a little higher than usual.
Goodbye to the crusty old 5.7.0-rc0 kernel. Shouldn't
we all toast with our favorite beverage, when the no-longer-needed kernels
are erased? Mine is cold ginger beer and my favorite brand
is Fentim
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 21:30:41 -0500,
David wrote:
Today's update seemed to go smoothly. I think I would call this a
typical
minor update that happens about twice a week, or maybe three times per week
?
Normally there is a new compose daily. You can look at the recent ones
at: https:/
Today's update seemed to go smoothly. I think I would call this a
typical
minor update that happens about twice a week, or maybe three times per week
?
As opposed to the larger weekly or bi-weekly update that has mesa, systemd,
glibc, gcc, etc.
The big news from my novice perspective, is no
25 matches
Mail list logo
