Re: Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2016-12-22 Thread Kanika Murarka
Hi, Sorry, It took a bit longer time. The demo repository has been setted up here[1]. The repo includes following:- 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone. 2. There are 5 levels of priority: 1. Blocker 2. Critical 3. Major 4. Minor 5. Trivial 3. The keywords, component and type are

Re: Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2016-12-11 Thread Kanika Murarka
Hi Adam, +1 for that, it will give us more confidence to go ahead with pagure :). I will look into the available tools and start with it asap. Regards Kanika (a2batic) On 7 December 2016 at 02:35, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:13 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > > Sumantro

Re: Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2016-12-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:13 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA > tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for > guiding . > Following are the points:- > 1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient. > 2. Wiki

Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2016-09-25 Thread Kanika Murarka
Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for guiding . Following are the points:- 1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient. 2. Wiki -> overview 2. In the Pagure repo, priorities can be set for tic