Sender: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On-Behalf-Of: awill...@redhat.com
Subject: Review and notification of blocker bugs
Message-Id: <1311889932.1955.67.camel@adam>
Recipient: np...@trinity.edu.test-google-a.com, Forwarded: neal.p...@trinity.edu
--- Begin Message ---
I'm currentl
Sender: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On-Behalf-Of: tfl...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Review and notification of blocker bugs
Message-Id: <20110728162037.07421...@seasicklaptop.tirfa.net>
Recipient: np...@trinity.edu.test-google-a.com, Forwarded: neal.p...@trinity.edu
--- Begin Message
Sender: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On-Behalf-Of: awill...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Review and notification of blocker bugs
Message-Id: <1311893274.1955.84.camel@adam>
Recipient: np...@trinity.edu.test-google-a.com, Forwarded: neal.p...@trinity.edu
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2011
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 08:29 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > 3. If 'no' to question 2, do people think we need to do some sort of
> > review and notification outside of the blocker meetings and updating the
> > bugs themselves? If so, what?
>
> Daily/frequent review of the bugs outside the meeting i
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 14:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm currently surveying the QA release calendar:
>
> http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html
>
> to check we have SOPs for all tasks on it. As part of that, a couple of
> tasks have emerged that we don't r
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:20 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > 3. If 'no' to question 2, do people think we need to do some sort of
> > review and notification outside of the blocker meetings and updating
> > the bugs themselves? If so, what?
>
> I think that there could be some value in going over the
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:52:12 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> "Daily Review & Notification of Open Alpha|Beta|Final Blocker Bugs"
> is a trickier customer. As scheduled, it seems to suggest that for
> Alpha, Beta and Final, we should be 'reviewing and notifying' open
> blockers for an arbitrary-s
I'm currently surveying the QA release calendar:
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html
to check we have SOPs for all tasks on it. As part of that, a couple of
tasks have emerged that we don't really _do_.
"NVR Update Check testing" was requested a long time ago
