On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Role installation
>
> For at least F22, do we need to have a criterion for installing
> new roles
> with rolekit? Or will "brought to a working configuration" cover
> this enough?
So looking at this as I add the server role requiremen
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 09:43 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good idea to me. Do we have a "phase out" SOP
> somewhere for criteria? I'm not finding it readily on the wiki if
> it's there.
We don't, but indeed it does sound like a good idea for things we're
just 'aging out'. T
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:38:55PM +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>Kickstart Delivery
> >>>
> >>> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
> >>>supported
> >>> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or d
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:21:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> > Greetings testers!
> >
> > While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> > some cleanup
> > opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd e
On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Kickstart Delivery
>
> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
>supported
> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or do we still
>actively test
> using a diskette for ks delivery?
Hum, not sure. I know I have
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Greetings testers!
>
> While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> some cleanup
> opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd email the
> list before
> making any changes.
>
> Beta
>
>
> Package s
Greetings testers!
While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed some cleanup
opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd email the list before
making any changes.
Beta
Package set selection
Should we update this to say "when using any network install imag