Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Adam Pribyl wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> Adam Pribyl wrote:
>>>
Does anybody know what is a replacement for
gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
should work under gnome shell?
>
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Adam Pribyl wrote:
>>
>>> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
>>> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
>>> should work under gnome shell?
>>>
>>> For me
>>> $ xdg-open Picture
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adam Pribyl wrote:
>
>> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
>> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
>> should work under gnome shell?
>>
>> For me
>> $ xdg-open Pictures/
>> which: no gnome-default-applications-properti
Adam Pribyl wrote:
> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
> should work under gnome shell?
>
> For me
> $ xdg-open Pictures/
> which: no gnome-default-applications-properties in ..
>
> xdg is looking for gnome-default-a
Mathieu Bouffard wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 02:25 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
>> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
>> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
>> should work under gnome shell?
>>
>> For me
>> $ xdg-open Pictures/
>> which: no gnome-default-applications-p
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Mathieu Bouffard wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 02:25 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
>> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
>> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
>> should work under gnome shell?
>>
>> For me
>> $ xdg-open Pictures/
>> which: no gnome-d
On 06/02/2011 02:25 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> Does anybody know what is a replacement for
> gnome-default-applications-properties, or how the setup of xdg-open
> should work under gnome shell?
>
> For me
> $ xdg-open Pictures/
> which: no gnome-default-applications-properties in ..
>
> xdg is lookin