2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth
> Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> > ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
> > it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
>
> As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
>
> And did not affect Disabled.
> --
>
> ok, f1
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
> it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
And did not affect Disabled.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
2011/5/20 cornel panceac
>
>
> 2011/5/20 JB
>
>> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
>> time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>> >
>>
>> Well, I just looked out the window ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:47 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kevin DeKorte wrote:
>> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
>
> I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
> prohibiting ping -R e
2011/5/20 JB
> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
> time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >
>
> Well, I just looked out the window ...
>
> There are a couple of guys out there, w
cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>
Well, I just looked out the window ...
There are a couple of guys out there, with some funny head covers, smil
2011/5/20 Tom Horsley
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
> >
> > why not?
>
> Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
> app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
> prob
On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
cornel panceac wrote:
> > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
>
> why not?
Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
probably switch to the gentoo distro and se
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
prohibiting ping -R even when set to Permissive (not Disabled).
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486225
--
test
cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth mailto:m...@cchtml.com>>
>
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the
>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
>> selinux\* policy\*.
>> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
>> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> > and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't
cornel panceac wrote:
> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> selinux\* policy\*.
> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
Side note: This thread is a great c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:36 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
>> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
>> user with too many privs once wh
2011/5/20 Jon Ciesla
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > cornel panceac wrote:
> >
> >> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> >> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >>
> >
> > Define "remove".
> >
> > If you mean disable then Fedora
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
> user with too many privs once who removed python.
I cannot remember the exact case, but there was something with
networking (maybe pi
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>>
>
> Define "remove".
>
> If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
>
cornel panceac wrote:
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define "remove".
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If it doesn't then you should file a bug.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:14:13PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried,
> (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Just to ask the stupid question, are you aware that it can be turned off
at insta
cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in
mind? Why Disabled or Permissive insufficient?
-J
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
