On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 10:01 -0600, Peter G. wrote:
> Michael Spahn wrote:
>
> > In my opionion it's still a bug, the should be a notice what "Apply" mean.
>
> I agree. I meant that I don't need any more hints or tips, because I have
> solved
> the problem and I now have ssh working. Clearly, as
Michael Spahn wrote:
> In my opionion it's still a bug, the should be a notice what "Apply" mean.
I agree. I meant that I don't need any more hints or tips, because I have
solved
the problem and I now have ssh working. Clearly, as I was trying to get this
solved, we stumbled across a bug in th
In my opionion it's still a bug, the should be a notice what "Apply" mean.
Am 27.08.2011 01:59, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> # ip(6)tables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
>> # ACCEPT
>> run "systemctl restart iptables.service" and
>> "systemctl rest
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # ip(6)tables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
> # ACCEPT
> run "systemctl restart iptables.service" and
> "systemctl restart ip6tables.service"
This works.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fe
Peter G. wrote:
> I guess thatÅ› because I restarted after I came back from the body shop.
Yes, your iptables/ip6tables settings get loaded by the
iptables/ip6tables service upon boot-up. You can get the same effect as
running "systemctl restart iptables.service" and "systemctl restart
ip6tables
Michael Spahn wrote:
> Bug is opened, feel free to add a comment.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733778
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
Thanks. I was going to do that after I get back from a jog :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fed
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Peter G. wrote:
>> iptables -L does now show an ssh entry. Does this also do ipv6 (or would
>> I ever need to deal with this in an ipv6 situation, down the road?)?
>
> No. You will want ip6tables for that.
Odd. I just checked /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables and there is thi
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> The apply button in system-config-firewall should apply the firewall
> settings. He shouldn't need to reboot or reload the iptables rules.
That's what I thought. That's why it says apply. Apply means to put into being,
now.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I assume you have rebooted after changing firewall rules
no. I didn't. Linux folklore states that rebooing is not necessary
> and/or issued:
>
> # systemctl restart iptables.service
I didn know I had to.
> If so, then I dunno
but I do... now.
--
test maili
Peter G. wrote:
> iptables -L does now show an ssh entry. Does this also do ipv6 (or would I
> ever
> need to deal with this in an ipv6 situation, down the road?)?
No. You will want ip6tables for that.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>I assume you have rebooted after changing firewall rules and/or issued:
>
> # systemctl restart iptables.service
>
> If so, then I dunno
The apply button in system-config-firewall should apply the firewall
settings. He shouldn't need to reboot or reload the iptable
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
> # ACCEPT
>
> As Michael said, system-config-firewall has a bug. You two should file a
> bug against it.
Thanks for all the help. I hope this will now work. I will try it in a couple
of
hours...
Bug is opened, feel free to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733778
Regards
Michael
Am 26.08.2011 21:04, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Spahn wrote:
>
>> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
>>
>> I actually don't know why but I always had to disab
On 08/26/2011 02:55 PM, Peter G. wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> # iptables -L | grep ssh
>> ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywherestate NEW
>> tcp dpt:ssh
>
> You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
> I see that ssh is nowhere
Does it put the correct rules in iptable.safe? Might be a systemd problem of
restarting with the new rules. Does it work after a reboot?
Jan
--
Jan H Wildeboer|
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23
Michael Spahn wrote:
> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
>
> I actually don't know why but I always had to disable the whole firewall.
I never had to disable the firewall in f13 or f14 or f15 for ssh (only for nfs,
which I no longer use, because of that and other reas
Peter G. wrote:
> You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
> I see that ssh is nowhere in the output, so how could grep ssh ever return
> anything?
My command was an example of when a firewall rule existed to allow ssh
through.
>
> But, when I examine /etc/s
Michael Spahn wrote:
> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
You should file a bug...
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # iptables -L | grep ssh
> ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywherestate NEW
> tcp dpt:ssh
You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
I see that ssh is nowhere in the output, so how could grep ssh ever return
Hello,
I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
I actually don't know why but I always had to disable the whole firewall.
Regards
Michael
Am 26.08.2011 20:40, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> netstat lists network port information. It does not know about
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> netstat lists network port information. It does not know about or list
> firewall configuration information.
>
> iptables is the command-line tool to view, add, delete, or change
> firewall rules.
>
> # iptables -L# lists default table rules
>
> # iptables -L |
Peter G. wrote:
> Doesn't that mean the firewall is open on port 22 (for both ipv4/6, even)?
netstat lists network port information. It does not know about or list
firewall configuration information.
iptables is the command-line tool to view, add, delete, or change
firewall rules.
# iptables -
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Is the firewall on both machines configure to allow port 22 through?
I think so. I unclicked and reclicked ssh in the firewall configuration, then
apply.
Then I restarted sshd.service on both computers and on both computers netstat
showed:
tcp0 0 0.0.
Peter G. wrote:
> What is happening? How can I get the computers to communicate?
Is the firewall on both machines configure to allow port 22 through?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
24 matches
Mail list logo