On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 09:02:17 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:57:01AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > libcap provides posix capabilities support - fair question would be
> >
> > how to get a list of applications which use libcap stuff it provides.
> >
> > rpm
On 09/06/2011 07:57 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> I suspect someone has or has written a tool to catalog these things -
>
> anyone?
# lsof | grep libcap.so
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:57:01AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> libcap provides posix capabilities support - fair question would be
> how to get a list of applications which use libcap stuff it provides.
>
> rpm -q -l libcap
>
> shows these are provided:
>
> /lib64/libcap.so.2
> /lib64/l
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> I need guidance. I've installed the F14 libcap from updates-testing.
>> I have no idea if it works or how to test it--it doesn't appear to
>> "break" anything as far as normal operation of my system. Is that
>> good enough to give
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I need guidance. I've installed the F14 libcap from updates-testing.
> I have no idea if it works or how to test it--it doesn't appear to
> "break" anything as far as normal operation of my system. Is that
> good enough to give +1 karma
Am 05.09.2011 05:14, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 09/05/2011 02:31 AM, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> >
> > I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package
> > gets stuck in
> > -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update,
> > where only o
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:48:07AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 08:44 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > So, I guess what I'm asking is, is it ok to give +1 to any/all
> > packages if they work at all/we don't notice any regressions, or do we
> > have to actually test what they are suppo
On 09/05/2011 08:44 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> So, I guess what I'm asking is, is it ok to give +1 to any/all
> packages if they work at all/we don't notice any regressions, or do we
> have to actually test what they are supposed to fix? Thanks.
It is ok to +1 if you don't notice any regressions
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:34:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> >
> > I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package
> > gets stuck in
> > -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 l
On 09/05/2011 02:31 AM, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets
> stuck in
> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where
> only one
> proventester cared to test the updated package and commen
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>>
>> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package
>> gets stuck in
>> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, wher
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets
> stuck in
> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where
> only one
> proventester cared to test the updated packa
12 matches
Mail list logo
