On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:24:51 -0600, OP wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> >>> don't get into raw
On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
>>> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
>>
>> This has probably be
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
>
> This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n
On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n-1)
builds automatically into rawhide? Might provide so
On 04/15/2011 05:41 PM, Andre Robatino wrote
> Seems like it's pointless to have No Frozen Rawhide when it's usually behind
> Branched anyway. Is AutoQA expected to eventually prevent builds happening
> later on Rawhide? Or is it impractical to be that strict? (I seem to remember
> someone saying s
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Why are many rawhide packages lagging so far behind F15 lately? For example,
> in
> rawhide, many gnome packages including gnome-panel are still at 2.91. Does it
> have anything to do with the trouble generating deltas (
> https://fedoraho
