On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:35:39 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 16:29:19 -0500,
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Bruno Wolff III on 09/28/2011 04:20 PM wrote:
> > >Not really. There are messages that limit the updates to those that
> > >still need testing and are grouped by
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, 9:23:52 PM, Tim wrote:
> I think that there are things planned for bodhi, but for now I'm
> generating a list of critpath packages in updates-testing sorted by
> time spent in testing.
> http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/testing_stats/
> Once beta is released, I'm p
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:20:12 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 15:11:10 -0500,
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > Would an automatically generated web page make more sense? I
> > > don't think the old data has much value, so I would expect that
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 16:29:19 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III on 09/28/2011 04:20 PM wrote:
> >Not really. There are messages that limit the updates to those that
> >still need testing and are grouped by crit path and security as well.
> >
> >While you could start with the
Bruno Wolff III on 09/28/2011 04:20 PM wrote:
> Not really. There are messages that limit the updates to those that
> still need testing and are grouped by crit path and security as well.
>
> While you could start with the general updates page it's useful to have
> something help prioritize targets
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 15:11:10 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > Would an automatically generated web page make more sense? I don't think
> > the old data has much value, so I would expect that going to a web page
> > to get the latest info when you want it makes m
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Would an automatically generated web page make more sense? I don't think
> the old data has much value, so I would expect that going to a web page
> to get the latest info when you want it makes more sense then getting
> email messages continuously.
You mean like this?
--
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:13:03 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
> 'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
> updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched discussion.
>
> I suppose we could als
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
> 'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
> updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched discussion.
>
> I suppose we could also expand it to have all testing/qa related no
On 09/28/2011 03:48 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:13 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
>> 'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
>> updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branche
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:13 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
> 'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
> updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched discussion.
>
> I suppose we could also expand
11 matches
Mail list logo
