On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> The adjusted criterion seems to affect only this test case:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_menus
>
> My current plan is to redo it somewhat. I want to:
>
> 1. Drop all instructions to run applications from Testcase_desktop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:04 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received
>> no further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
> further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 14:58 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
> > further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.ph
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Note: In point 2), we don't actually need 10 different test cases
> (templated or not). We might just create Testcase_desktop_app_single
> instead of those 10 and differentiate them on the matrix level the same way
> as we do with e.g. "Testcas
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:01 PM Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> There are some high-profile types of applications that I considered
>> including in the list above, but didn’t in the end:
>>
>> * word editor (e.g. libreoffice-writer)
>>
>> * sprea
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> There are some high-profile types of applications that I considered
> including in the list above, but didn’t in the end:
>
> * word editor (e.g. libreoffice-writer)
>
> * spreadsheet editor (e.g. libreoffice-calc)
>
> * video player (e.g
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
> further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&
It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&oldid=564126
I've done slight tweaks compared to the original
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:28 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:55 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > """
> > If there are multiple applications of the same type (e.g. several web
> browsers), the primary/default one must satisfy the requirements. If the
> primary/default application can'
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:55 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> """
> If there are multiple applications of the same type (e.g. several web
> browsers), the primary/default one must satisfy the requirements. If the
> primary/default application can't be determined, only one of said
> applications must sa
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:43 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I haven't received much feedback on this proposal. On test list and kde
> list, there was a short follow-up regarding the list of release-blocking
> applications. On kde list, Kevin disagreed because it lowers the guaranteed
> quality bar for KD
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:44 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> This proposal intends to reduce the scope of the “*Default application
>> functionality*” release criterion [0]:
>>
>> All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
>>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> This proposal intends to reduce the scope of the “*Default application
> functionality*” release criterion [0]:
>
> All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
>> mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default in
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 7:19 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> >
> > *= Proposal =*
> >
> > Change the criterion to something along these lines:
> >
> > All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
> >
> > As you can see, the original criterion was kept for Fedora’s flagship
> > des
> This proposal intends to reduce the scope of the “*Default application
> functionality*” release criterion [0]:
>
> All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
>
> *= Background =*
>
> The area which QA is responsible for has been growing and growing in recent
> years. W
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Change the criterion to something along these lines:
>
>> All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
>> mechanism after a default installation of Fedora Workstation on x86_64
>> architecture must start successfully and w
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:59 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> In the test list at:
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_Branched_20200212.n.1_Desktop
>
> There are 27 rows of things to test on between 1 and five platforms.
>
Hey Pat, why does this email have subject "prop
18 matches
Mail list logo
