On 09/16/2010 02:38 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> nss-tools package does not provide any of those; just a bunch of
> utilities.
>
Mea culpa - I had simply done a yum list installed | egrep nss to see
what was installed and added the i686 versions ...
I erased nss-tools.i686 and for good
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 01:16:42PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> I have sometimes to run 32 bit apps as there is as yet no 64 bit version.
>
> So, for me, all I need is the right suite of 32 bit runtime libs to be
> available.
It is not very likely that you need nss-tools.i686 for such
p
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:16:42 -0400, Genes wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 12:57 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> I have sometimes to run 32 bit apps as there is as yet no 64 bit version.
That doesn't answer what you need nss-tools.i686 for. It contains only
executables, no libraries. Use nss-tools.x86_
On 09/16/2010 12:57 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
I have sometimes to run 32 bit apps as there is as yet no 64 bit version.
So, for me, all I need is the right suite of 32 bit runtime libs to be
available.
What I have been doing so far is ldd'ing the apps and figuring out
what needs to be
On 09/16/2010 12:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> multilib_policy=all
>
> in yum.conf [main]
>
> it's in the man page.
>
> -sv
>
>
To be clear - lets say I do a clean 64 bit install. Then I edit the
yum.conf - add the above as you suggest.
yum update does not install any 32 bit libs (or apps
On 09/16/2010 12:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>> What do you recommend I do now to clean up - Heres what I have
>> installed (those whose names start with nss):
>
> multilib_policy=all
>
> in yum.conf [main]
>
> it's in the man page.
>
> -sv
>
>
Great thanks - I had man yum (instead of yum.c
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
>
> Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
> I added the i686 libs - I did not do it ri
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:24 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
>
> Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
> I added the i686 libs - I did not do it right ...
On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
I added the i686 libs - I did not do it right ...
I could find no clean way to make the box multiarch aside from ad
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:09:35 -0400, Genes wrote:
> I dont see a nss-tools.i686 for version
> 3.12.7-2 perhaps that is a problem ?
There is no nss-tools.i686 in any of the x86_64 repos.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-6.fc13,ns
On 09/16/2010 09:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 08:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>>
>> Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64.
>
>Thats where I started last week .. and this was an attempt to see if
> I could get further.
>
> . what is broken
On 09/16/2010 08:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64.
Thats where I started last week .. and this was an attempt to see if
I could get further.
. what is broken here ? rpm, yum or the
>> packages ?
>
> What's strange her
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:40:20 -0400, Genes wrote:
>
> I have both 64 and 32 bit libs installed.
Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64.
>
>
>
> Error: Package: nss-tools-3.12.6-12.fc13.i686
> (@/nss-tools-3
13 matches
Mail list logo
