On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:27:31 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> Speaking entirely personally, I'm firmly in the 'ditch the stupid
> release names, they serve no purpose' camp.
Oh so true. ;) I favour the more liberal approach. If there are people
(read: resources) who handle the entire release name proces
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:24 PM, george2 wrote:
> There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name.
> Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of contributors,
> should this group pause to reflect if the release name is appropriate for
> world wide releas
On 09/04/12 17:01, Andre Robatino wrote:
People seem comfortable referring to "Windows 7". If it has a code name, I don't
know it. Maybe it's just relative to other linux distros such as Ubuntu.
If it was "Fedora 18.4", a name would be handy.
But, personally a name should be kept internal
to
On 04/09/2012 10:23 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> Well, Toshio raised an important point in the above-referenced thread
> on advisory-board - just a version number makes Fedora feel cold and
> distant to any new user or the press or anything like that. The
> release name is also used by the design team
On 04/09/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
Well, Toshio raised an important point in the above-referenced thread
on advisory-board - just a version number makes Fedora feel cold and
distant to any new user or the press or anything like that. The
release name is also used by the design team in com
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Larry Brower wrote:
> As am I :)
>
> I don't see why just having a version number isn't enough.
Well, Toshio raised an important point in the above-referenced thread
on advisory-board - just a version number makes Fedora feel cold and
distant to any new user or the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/09/2012 01:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Speaking entirely personally, I'm firmly in the 'ditch the stupid
> release names, they serve no purpose' camp.
As am I :)
I don't see why just having a version number isn't enough.
- --
Larry
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:37 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:24 PM, george2 wrote:
> > There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name.
> > Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of contributors,
> > should this group pause to refl
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 13:24 -0400, george2 wrote:
> There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release
> name.
> Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of
> contributors, should this group pause to reflect if the release name
> is appropriate for world wide re
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:24 PM, george2 wrote:
> There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name.
> Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of contributors,
> should this group pause to reflect if the release name is appropriate for
> world wide releas
On 04/06/2012 12:02 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Frank Murphy gmail.com> writes:
The only way to do that is not to have a name.
I'd favor this. Almost no one uses the name, and when they do it only causes
confusion when people have to look it up. Maybe each version could have an
official artwor
On 06/04/12 20:18, Scott Doty wrote:
George, just be happy they didn't go with the first choice: "Vivid
animated penis."
Happy Good Friday. :)
Whats good about it?
The pubs are closed. ;)
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On 04/06/2012 11:27 AM, John Dulaney wrote:
This has nothing to do with QA.
Seconded.
George, just be happy they didn't go with the first choice: "Vivid
animated penis."
Happy Good Friday. :)
-Scott
p.s. extra points if you recognize the Usenet reference...
--
test mailing list
test@li
On 06/04/12 19:56, Rick Stevens wrote:
Putting in my two cents (pence, 5% of a euro, whatever),
2% of a euro, sorry! Bad day on the keyboard. :-p
Don't make much difference,
5% is now 2%, due to national debt crisis.
Unless it's a personable tax, then the reverse applies.
--
Regards,
Frank
On 04/06/2012 11:54 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/06/2012 11:36 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 06/04/12 18:24, george2 wrote:
of the release name will not offend women, parents,
and many who are spiritual or profess a religion?
No mater how liberal a guy I might be, this expresses a concern for ho
On 04/06/2012 11:36 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 06/04/12 18:24, george2 wrote:
of the release name will not offend women, parents,
and many who are spiritual or profess a religion?
No mater how liberal a guy I might be, this expresses a concern for how
open source might be perceived by the gener
On 06/04/12 18:24, george2 wrote:
of the release name will not offend women, parents,
and many who are spiritual or profess a religion?
No mater how liberal a guy I might be, this expresses a concern for how
open source might be perceived by the general public.
Even if these pictures and words
This has nothing to do with QA.
John.
From: geor...@spanmail.net
To: fedora-test-l...@redhat.com
Subject: is the name ok
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:24:24 -0400
There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name.
Before millions see the latest great work from a multi
18 matches
Mail list logo
