Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:10 AM Luna Jernberg wrote:
>
> Tested successfully today
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:04 PM Luna Jernberg wrote:
>>
>> Jumped in and helping testing on two older laptops :)
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:30 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
Tested successfully today
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:04 PM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Jumped in and helping testing on two older laptops :)
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:30 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Grub and Shim Test Day starts today
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:20
Jumped in and helping testing on two older laptops :)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:30 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Grub and Shim Test Day starts today
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-04-12_Grub_and_Shim_Test_Day
>
> Special call out: No installation required! If you have (U
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 01:15 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> to this problem in Grub: "when I select Win 8.1, I can wait forever" 2
> screenshots,
> current Grub code to start Win8.1 and current Grub code to start F23.
> Kind regards
You already got a reply, from Richard Ryniker, and it was c
When you change from the GRUB default boot item, the timer stops and no
default boot occurs. You must use a key to tell GRUB to boot the current
selection.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 24.04.2015 18:57, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> On 24.04.2015 13:02, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>> On 24/04/2015 11.13 +0200, poma wrote:
>>> On 24.04.2015 07:50, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
> On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giuli
On 24.04.2015 13:02, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> On 24/04/2015 11.13 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 24.04.2015 07:50, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>>> Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>> On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob
On 24.04.2015 13:02, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> On 24/04/2015 11.13 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 24.04.2015 07:50, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>>> Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>> On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob
On 24/04/2015 11.13 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 24.04.2015 07:50, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> > Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
> > > On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> > > > > On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> > > > > >
On 24.04.2015 07:50, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
>> On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> Can I simply delete "rhgb quiet" in order to s
Il giorno gio, 23/04/2015 alle 22.58 +0200, poma ha scritto:
> On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
> > > On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can I simply delete "rhgb quiet" in order to show what's
> > > > happening
> > >
> > > O
On 23.04.2015 21:20, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
>> On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can I simply delete "rhgb quiet" in order to show what's happening
>>
>> Of course, this is my default everywhere.
>>
>>> during the boot process, GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= ?
> On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> >
> >
> > Can I simply delete "rhgb quiet" in order to show what's happening
>
> Of course, this is my default everywhere.
>
> > during the boot process, GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= ? I hesitate to make
> > a
> > change and find that
On 23.04.2015 20:23, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> Can I simply delete "rhgb quiet" in order to show what's happening
Of course, this is my default everywhere.
> during the boot process, GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= ? I hesitate to make a
> change and find that I can't boot the compu
-
Von: Chris Murphy
An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Verschickt: Do, 18 Dez 2014 5:29 am
Betreff: Re: Grub, which Kernel to boot
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 14:01 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 14:01 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson <
>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > answer to ques
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 14:01 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
> > > I Downloaded and ins
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
>> I Downloaded and installed immediately after the announcement of F21
>> Final release.
>
>
>
> Hm. There was a known bu
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
> I Downloaded and installed immediately after the announcement of F21
> Final release.
Hm. There was a known bug along these lines around Alpha, but it was
expected to be fixed
, 17 Dez 2014 5:59 am
Betreff: Re: Grub, which Kernel to boot
On 12/17/14 12:34, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi
> when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the top position
> Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is
> Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64
5:59 am
Betreff: Re: Grub, which Kernel to boot
On 12/17/14 12:34, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi
> when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the top position
> Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is
> Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64
> Is this ok
On 17/12/14 17:01, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 23:34 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi
when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the
top position
Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is
Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64
Is this ok? Should it not
On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 23:34 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi
> when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the
> top position
> Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is
> Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64
> Is this ok? Should it not be vice versa?
>
Did you origi
On 12/17/14 12:34, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi
> when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the top position
> Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is
> Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64
> Is this ok? Should it not be vice versa?
> Kind Regards
> Joerg
>
>
Well, on
On 10/23/2014 04:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
The post is telling you how to move the bits manually. It's mostly
relevant to admins migrating from the pre-2008 version of the software
doing the writing, to the version that knows better. Since you said
that GRUB is trashed after every Windows boot,
On Oct 23, 2014 4:50 PM, "Ankur Sinha" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 06:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Google ZISD. Look at screen. See "GRUB and ZISD - Cool Solutions |
> > Novell" as second entry.
> >
> > Click on link.
> >
> > https://www.novell.com/communities/coolsolutions/grub-and-zis
On 10/23/2014 03:50 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I actually tried that - it didn't seem to work. Instead of one sector
with ZISD, now I have 2.
The post is from 2008 and is probably referring to legacy GRUB.
From the error I had posted earlier, I think GRUB2 leaves the sector
occupied by ZISD be.
I
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 06:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Google ZISD. Look at screen. See "GRUB and ZISD - Cool Solutions |
> Novell" as second entry.
>
> Click on link.
>
> https://www.novell.com/communities/coolsolutions/grub-and-zisd/
I actually tried that - it didn't seem to work. Instead o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/14 06:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Google ZISD.
or Google "zisd grub" for a better list of reading material.
- --
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlRJgIoACg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/14 01:47, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently gotten a new workstation at university. It came with
> Windows 7 and of course, I added Fedora 21 to the mix. However, each
> time I log into Windows and reboot, it seems to get stuck in
Haha. Dumb autocorrect. POSTING!=PAYING. If only that worked...
(Top post because mobile email.)
On Oct 23, 2014 4:13 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I suggest searching or paying on grub-help@ and maybe their devel list what
> ZISD is. Funny though GRUB suggests others not use what GRUB usurps.
> -
I suggest searching or paying on grub-help@ and maybe their devel list what
ZISD is. Funny though GRUB suggests others not use what GRUB usurps.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/23/2014 11:47 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently gotten a new workstation at university. It came with
> Windows 7 and of course, I added Fedora 21 to the mix. However, each
> time I log into Windows and reboot, it seems to get stuck in a kind of
> boot loop at BIOS - probably c
On 10.10.2014 11:42, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The official fix likely won't fix already-installed systems, only future
> installs.
>
ain't a problem we can't fix, coz we can do it in da mix
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On 10/10/2014 04:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob
>> Goodwin wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way
>>> to make it
>>> > boot from the newest? I change
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 04:55 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin
> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make
> >> > it
> >> > boot from t
On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make it
> boot from the newest? I changed GRUB_DEFAULT=saved to GRUB_DEFAULT=0. That
> moved it from the oldest to the second,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make it
> boot from the newest? I changed GRUB_DEFAULT=saved to GRUB_DEFAULT=0. That
> moved it from the oldest to the second, not the latest as I expected. I did
> run grub2
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:31 AM, miguel wrote:
> I have a small problem. When you boot the pc, which selects the kernel
> is not the last, that is, the newest, but selects a lower each time you
> install a kernel update.
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#Default_boot_menu_.28grub.
On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 16:44:29 David wrote:
>
> Thank you. That is where I had expected it to go.
Hi David, quick update...
I don't know if you've noticed but with that vga=0x305 on that linux line, I
get a message at boot time telling me that its depreciated and to use 'set
gfxpayload=1024x76
On 10/17/2011 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:21 +0100, Martin Airs wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
>>>
>>> To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
>>>
>>> - --
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> I don't actually know the correct/official way to do this, but here's
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:21 +0100, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
> >
> > To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
> >
> > - --
> >
> > David
>
> I don't actually know the correct/official way to do this, but here's the
> first menu entry in my grub.cfg
>
> me
On 10/16/2011 4:21 PM, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
>>
>> To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
>>
>> - --
>>
>> David
>
> I don't actually know the correct/official way to do this, but
> here's the first menu entry in my grub.cfg
>
> menuentry 'Linux, with Linux
On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 08:06:32 David wrote:
>
> To what line did you add 'vga=0x305'?
>
> - --
>
> David
I don't actually know the correct/official way to do this, but here's the first
menu entry in my grub.cfg
menuentry 'Linux, with Linux 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc16.x86_64' --class gnu-linux
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:06:32AM -0400, David wrote:
> On 10/15/2011 6:55 PM, Martin Airs wrote:
> > I'v just copied over some of the old kernel
> > parameters like vga=0x305 and nouveau.modeset=0 and
> > rdblacklist=nouveau. your's might not have them don't know, but it
> > boots ok
>
> To wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2011 6:55 PM, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 13:25:53 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> So today yum wants to put grub2 onto my rawhide system, nudging
>> grub out of the way in the process. This makes me nervous. Last
>> time I read a
On Saturday 15 Oct 2011 13:25:53 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So today yum wants to put grub2 onto my rawhide system, nudging grub out
> of the way in the process. This makes me nervous. Last time I read
> about this, it wasn't a straightforward update from one to the other. If
> that has changed, c
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 13:25:53 -0600,
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So today yum wants to put grub2 onto my rawhide system, nudging grub out
> of the way in the process. This makes me nervous. Last time I read
> about this, it wasn't a straightforward update from one to the other. If
> that has
Hi,
2011/10/15 Jonathan Corbet :
> So today yum wants to put grub2 onto my rawhide system,
I've got the same problem here on F16 - grub2 from updates-testing
wants to replace grub.
Why now? Why not while F15->F16 update?
> nudging grub out
> of the way in the process. This makes me nervous. L
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 23:54 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
> > Well, the latest update wants to replace grub with grub2 and update
> > grub-efi.
> >
> >
> > I hesitate to execute the update, will EFI systems still boot?
>
> Yes, it shou
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 23:54 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
> Well, the latest update wants to replace grub with grub2 and update
> grub-efi.
>
>
> I hesitate to execute the update, will EFI systems still boot?
Yes, it should. grub-efi does not require grub; all the EFI bits are in
grub-efi. J
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Christian Menzel <
christian.men...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>>
>> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
>> >
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
> > grub and
> > you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the
> >
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
> What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
> grub and
> you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the
> rush and do
> it now - install grub2, remove grub (you can u
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:29 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 01:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace grub and
> > you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the rush and do
> > it now - install grub2, remov
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 13:14 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 10/10/2011 12:59 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> >
> > > If we're really talking EFI here it should really be grub2-efi-mkconfi
> > > -o /boot/grub2-efi/grub.cfg and grub2-
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 13:14 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 10/10/2011 12:59 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> >
> > > If we're really talking EFI here it should really be grub2-efi-mkconfi
> > > -o /boot/grub2-efi/grub.cfg and grub2-efi-insta
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 13:14 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 12:59 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
>
> > If we're really talking EFI here it should really be grub2-efi-mkconfi
> > -o /boot/grub2-efi/grub.cfg and grub2-efi-install (without arguments).
> >
> > But grub2-efi is not installed b
On 10/10/2011 12:59 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> If we're really talking EFI here it should really be grub2-efi-mkconfi
> -o /boot/grub2-efi/grub.cfg and grub2-efi-install (without arguments).
>
> But grub2-efi is not installed by default.
>
> Jurgen
>
>
>
Hmmm .. is it still buggy? If not i
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:29 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 01:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace grub and
> > you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the rush and do
> > it now - install grub2, remov
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 12:43 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I have F16 running on a ThinkPad X220 and therefore a EFI setup with
> > both grub and grub2 installed.
> >
> >
> > Today yum wants to update (among
On 10/10/2011 01:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace grub and
> you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the rush and do
> it now - install grub2, remove grub (you can use yum shell mode to do
> this without any complaints
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 12:43 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have F16 running on a ThinkPad X220 and therefore a EFI setup with
> both grub and grub2 installed.
>
>
> Today yum wants to update (among others) the kernel and grub as well
> as grub2.
> But a conflict is repor
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, David Lehman wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:50 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> I have Branched boxes with have stayed as Branched since F14 with grub
>>
>> Now I try install grub2 - conflict.
>> How do I install without losing the 8 kernel entries in grub\menu.lst
>>
>> Wor
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:50 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> I have Branched boxes with have stayed as Branched since F14 with grub
>
> Now I try install grub2 - conflict.
> How do I install without losing the 8 kernel entries in grub\menu.lst
>
> Worried that "yum uninstall grub" will remove the e
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 19:22 -0400, Marty Felkler wrote:
> I could not isntall GRUB to the boot partition on my second drive
> /dev/sdb2. The only way was to install to MBR on /dev/sda. This was
This will no longer be an issue as of the first beta test compose. To
get grub2 installed on sdb2 yo
Marty Felkler wrote:
> you can use the command
> "grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg" to create grub.cfg
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> you have to hand edit to grub.cfg to make the other entries.
create other entries in /boot/grub2/custom.cfg
don't hand edit grub.cfg at all
--
te
I could not isntall GRUB to the boot partition on my second drive
/dev/sdb2. The only way was to install to MBR on /dev/sda. This was
kinda a bummer since it wiped out my TereabyteUnilimted Boot Manager
making Windows, openSUSE and Ubuntu unbootable. Will try to either
install GRUB on /dev/
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 21:29 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> If I see a grub.conf file on my EFI partition under /EFI/redhat/, does
> it mean anaconda installed grub instead of grub2?
> (the other files there are device.map and grub.efi, the syntax of
> grub.conf looks like normal grub 1 syntax inste
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:34 PM, James Laska wrote:
> This might require some experimentation, but if you used the Fedora 15
> installer, you won't have grub2 installed to the MBR, but grub.
Silly me, now that I read it it's pretty obvious it would have failed...
> Do you
> recall what bootloade
On 08/10/2011 11:25 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, James Laska wrote:
>> The best
>> option at this time might be to install Fedora 15, while adding the
>> Fedora 16 branched repos during install.
>
> I've just done this and finished the installation on a system with
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:25 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > The best
> > option at this time might be to install Fedora 15, while adding the
> > Fedora 16 branched repos during install.
>
> I've just done this and finished the installation on
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, James Laska wrote:
> The best
> option at this time might be to install Fedora 15, while adding the
> Fedora 16 branched repos during install.
I've just done this and finished the installation on a system with a
Fedora 13 installed.
I choose to keep /home and form
On 08/09/2011 10:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>
> if its failing please file a bug. we cant fix the issue if we do not know
> about
> it.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
bz 729457 filed.
723047 filed previously.
There are a lot of other anaconda issues (bzs filed) and when I finally
got an install done,
On 08/09/2011 11:46 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Keywords: pattern after, might.
Can fit these words into pretty much anything really.
>
> I suspect the actual *buntu problem may be in parted, not debian-installer.
Ubiquity is the default Ubuntu installer, Not d-i
> Does Anaconda not used pa
On 2011/08/09 23:36 (GMT+0530) Rahul Sundaram composed:
> Felix Miata wrote
>> The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2
>> installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM
>> information situated in the sector preceding
> Don't assume that. T
On 08/09/2011 11:26 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2
> installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM
> information situated in the sector preceding
Don't assume that. The implementation of the installer is e
On 2011/08/09 13:34 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
>> for making anything so poorly documented the default anything, much less an
>> only anything.
> https
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/08/09 10:01 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
>
> > I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> > installations, only grub2 will be used.
>
> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 09:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do package
> > I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> > installations, only grub2 will be used.
>
> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
> for making anything so poorly documented the default anything, much less an
> only anything.
I
On 2011/08/09 10:01 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
> I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> installations, only grub2 will be used.
Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
for making anything so poorly documented the default
On 08/09/2011 10:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 08:08:33 AM Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 08:08:33 AM Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do pa
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 09:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do package
On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
>> bootloader?
>
> no. but you could do package customization, de-select grub2, and select
> grub. (haven't tested thi
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> bootloader?
no. but you could do package customization, de-select grub2, and select
grub. (haven't tested this, but it sounds like it might work!)
--
Adam Williams
I made a typo:
On 08/09/10 10:35, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 3 SATA disks on my box with 3 installed systems:
>
> /dev/sda with windows7 on /dev/sda1, /dev/sdb for data and /dev/sdc for
> 2 Fedora systems: /dev/sdb5 with F13 and /dev/sdb7 with a fresh
/dev/sdb5 should be /dev/sdc5 a
88 matches
Mail list logo
