On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Why do you want to reinstall fftw, when you don't need it? ;)
I'm not sure...I guess because it was there before?
> You could try to reinstall fftw-libs, as that was always there, the
> -quad, -double, -single packages are all new
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Jayson Rowe wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to reply - it's been a busy, busy day.
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:57:15PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
>> fftw changed the package structure completely and is now currently
>> being pushed to stable:
>> https://admin.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:42:08PM -0400, Jayson Rowe wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to reply - it's been a busy, busy day.
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:57:15PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > fftw changed the package structure completely and is now currently
> > being pushed to stable:
> > ht
Sorry for taking so long to reply - it's been a busy, busy day.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:57:15PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> fftw changed the package structure completely and is now currently
> being pushed to stable:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6879/python-anfft-0.1-4
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jayson Rowe wrote:
> I saw a blog post this morning from Kevin Fenzi
> (http://scrye.com/wordpress-mu/nirik/2012/05/09/fedora-17-prerelease-and-updates-testing/)
> about how the updates-testing repo is now disabled, and I should do a
> 'yum distro-sync' to ensure n
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jayson Rowe wrote:
> I saw a blog post this morning from Kevin Fenzi
> (http://scrye.com/wordpress-mu/nirik/2012/05/09/fedora-17-prerelease-and-updates-testing/)
> about how the updates-testing repo is now disabled, and I should do a
> 'yum distro-sync' to ensure
