> > Fedora 18 Beta is not present, at least I don't see it. I
> > downloaded
> > the ISO image and booted inside VM (I wonder why it takes 15
> > seconds
> > to display the graphical menu with CPU running at 100%).
>
> It's in the 'prerelease' menu.
I might be blind, but it's not there. Only Alph
On 01/14/2013 04:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:39:31 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
Fedora 18 Beta is not present, at least I don't see it. I downloaded
the ISO image and booted inside VM (I wonder why it takes 15 seconds
to display the graphical menu with CPU running at 1
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I thought I would see if there's any interest in adding a critera /
> tests for boot.fedoraproject.org and adding it as a supported/tested
> install method for f19.
>
> I think it's pretty nifty and could be more used if we teste
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:39:31 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> Fedora 18 Beta is not present, at least I don't see it. I downloaded
> the ISO image and booted inside VM (I wonder why it takes 15 seconds
> to display the graphical menu with CPU running at 100%).
It's in the 'prerelease' menu.
>
> > I tried BFO a few times and I've found it heavily outdated every
> > time
> > (including today) so I wasn't particularly thrilled about it.
>
> Outdated in what sense? Not providing tc/rcs?
> The stable releases are there, the alpha/beta are there in a
> prerelease
> menu.
Fedora 18 Beta is n
Kamil,
On 2013-01-12 13:24, Philip Rhoades wrote:
Kamil,
On 2013-01-12 01:02, Kamil Paral wrote:
I would like a "BFO-Lite" install ie something small, light and
fast
to
install a minimal system with sshd (not even X or at least just
xdm+twm). I currently install (usually) from a Live CD/US
Kamil,
On 2013-01-12 01:02, Kamil Paral wrote:
I would like a "BFO-Lite" install ie something small, light and fast
to
install a minimal system with sshd (not even X or at least just
xdm+twm). I currently install (usually) from a Live CD/USB but it
would
be nice to have something that didn't n
Chris,
On 2013-01-12 05:25, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Philip Rhoades
wrote:
ie something small, light and fast to install a minimal system with
sshd (not even X or at least just xdm+twm). I currently install
(usually) from a Live CD/USB but it would be nice to have
Chris,
On 2013-01-12 05:20, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I tried BFO a few times and I've found it heavily outdated every
time (including today) so I wasn't particularly thrilled about it.
That's a problem.
Do you think this is something we should bl
On 01/11/2013 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:06:20 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
>We can create an optional test case for that.
>
>Do you think this is something we should block our release on (i.e.
>creating a release criteria for it)?
Nope, I don't think so off hand, I
On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> ie something small, light and fast to install a minimal system with sshd (not
> even X or at least just xdm+twm). I currently install (usually) from a Live
> CD/USB but it would be nice to have something that didn't need repeated
> downloa
On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I tried BFO a few times and I've found it heavily outdated every time
> (including today) so I wasn't particularly thrilled about it.
That's a problem.
> Do you think this is something we should block our release on (i.e. creating
> a release
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:40 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:06:20 -0500 (EST)
> Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > We can create an optional test case for that.
> >
> > Do you think this is something we should block our release on (i.e.
> > creating a release criteria for it)?
>
> Nope
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:06:20 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> We can create an optional test case for that.
>
> Do you think this is something we should block our release on (i.e.
> creating a release criteria for it)?
Nope, I don't think so off hand, I don't think it's critical or popular
enou
> I would like a "BFO-Lite" install ie something small, light and fast
> to
> install a minimal system with sshd (not even X or at least just
> xdm+twm). I currently install (usually) from a Live CD/USB but it
> would
> be nice to have something that didn't need repeated downloading.
What's wrong
On 01/10/2013 11:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I thought I would see if there's any interest in adding a critera /
tests for boot.fedoraproject.org and adding it as a supported/tested
install method for f19.
No
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
People,
On 2013-01-11 23:06, Kamil Paral wrote:
Greetings.
I thought I would see if there's any interest in adding a critera /
tests for boot.fedoraproject.org and adding it as a supported/tested
install method for f19.
I think it's pretty nifty and could be more used if we tested it to
make
> Greetings.
>
> I thought I would see if there's any interest in adding a critera /
> tests for boot.fedoraproject.org and adding it as a supported/tested
> install method for f19.
>
> I think it's pretty nifty and could be more used if we tested it to
> make sure it works and advertised it a bi
18 matches
Mail list logo
