On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:54 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> I use VirtualBox since years, and there has been no reason for me to
> switch to another virtualization method (I think, others think so too).
> But if there is a tutorial for the usage of Virtual Machine Manager and
> if it's possible to
On 09/22/2010 11:33 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim michelsylvain.info> writes:
>
>> I tend to run both VBox and KVM, depending on what the situation
>> requires. KVM tends to be much better at running BSD guests, for
>> instance. I've never really used VBox-OSE though -- the
Michel Alexandre Salim michelsylvain.info> writes:
> I tend to run both VBox and KVM, depending on what the situation
> requires. KVM tends to be much better at running BSD guests, for
> instance. I've never really used VBox-OSE though -- the VBox build from
> upstream, which has the proprieta
Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes:
> Hi Andre,
>
> if you mean: VirtualBox-OSE, ok. But, *as workaround*, I was successful
> in downloading the Fedora 13 version of VirtualBox rpm from
> virtualbox.org and installing this rpm (using --nodeps because of some
> dependency problems). It runs,
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:31:43 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> I'm a bit curios on why so many of you choose to use VirtualBox instead
> of the Virtual Machine Manager.
>
> Do you think that Virtual Machine Manager is to hard and to complicated
> to use?
>
> Are there any specific features
On 09/22/2010 10:53 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/22/2010 08:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>>
It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ
>>> Right. This isn't a Fedora pa
On 09/22/2010 10:31 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 08:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>> It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ
>> Right. This isn't a Fedora package.
>>
>> (The problem is that it hasn't
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes:
> On 09/22/2010 08:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >
> >> It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ
> > Right. This isn't a Fedora package.
> >
> > (The problem is that it hasn't been
On 09/22/2010 08:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>> It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ
> Right. This isn't a Fedora package.
>
> (The problem is that it hasn't been rebuilt against Python 2.7, BTW. I
> imagine there's some
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ
Right. This isn't a Fedora package.
(The problem is that it hasn't been rebuilt against Python 2.7, BTW. I
imagine there's some kind of problem with this, or it would probably
have happe
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:21:34 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
[snip]
> Error: Package: VirtualBox-OSE-3.2.6-2.fc14.i686
> (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libpython2.6.so.1.0
> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> --
On 09/22/2010 07:05 AM, Jose Medrano wrote:
> If you are not using a kernel PAE you can try with akmod... akmod
> recompiles the module every time a new kernel its installed
> Saludos
> Atte.
> Jose A. Medrano
Jose,
1. Installing akmod-VirtualBox-OSE done; but then trying installation
of Virtu
12 matches
Mail list logo
